Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Faculty research productivity 1972–1988: Development and application of constant units of measure

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The economic concept ofreal orconstant units of measure is utilized to assess the rate of inflation/deflation of opportunity for publication between 1972 and 1988 for the disciplines of biology, psychology, and English. Data for the study came from (1)Ulrich's International Periodicals Directory; (2)Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature; (3)American Universities and Colleges; (4) 570 journal issues across the three disciplines; and (5) national surveys of faculty conducted in 1972, 1980, and 1988. Based on changes over time in the amount of space in which faculty can publish their research and the number of individuals competing for that space, indexes are developed that convert 1988 publication counts into 1972 equivalents. Results indicate inflation rates of 103, 85, and -45 percent for biology, psychology, and English, respectively, between 1972 and 1988. Due to these rates, faculty had to produce 14.65, 5.05, and 1.18 articles, respectively, in the two years prior to 1988 to have been as productive inreal articles as they were in the two years prior to 1972.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayer, Alan E. (1973). Reaching faculty in academe: 1972–73.Research Reports 8(2). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, Richard J., Blackburn, Robert T., and Bieber, Jeffery P. (1990). Research note: Some corrections and suggestions for working with the national faculty survey databases.Research in Higher Education 31(6): 587–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, Robert T., and Lawrence, Janet H. (1989).Faculty at Work: Final Report of the National Survey. Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Post-secondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, R. R. (Various years).Ulrich's International Periodicals Directory. New York: R. R. Bowker.

  • Breneman, David W. (1970).An Economic Theory of Ph.D. Production: The Case at Berkeley. Paper P-8. Berkeley: University of California, Office of the Vice-President for Planning and Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1987, July 8). Carnegie Foundation's classification of more than 3300 institutions of higher education.Chronicle of Higher Education, 22–26, 28–30.

  • Cole, Stephen, Simon, Gary, and Cole, Jonathon R. (1988). Do journal rejection rates index consensus?American Sociological Review 53(1): 152–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Gruyter, Walter (Various years).American Universities and Colleges. New York: de Gruyter, Inc. (in collaboration with the American Council on Education).

  • Diamond, A. M., Jr. (1985). The money value of citations to single-authored and multiple-authored articles.Scientometrics 8(5–6): 315–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, Eugene (1980). Bradford's law and related statistical patterns.Current Contents 19: 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh, Daniel S., Johnson, George E., and Weisbrod, Burton A. (1982). Scholarship, citations, and salaries: Economic rewards in economics.Southern Economic Journal 36(2): 472–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargens, Lowell L. (1988a). Scholarly consensus and journal rejection rates.American Sociological Review 53(1): 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargens, Lowell L. (1988b). Further evidence on field differences in consensus from the NSF peer review studies.American Sociological Review 53(1): 157–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Research Institute (n.d.). Technical report to 1980 national survey (exact title unknown). Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles.

  • McGuire, Joseph W., Richman, Marie L., Daly, Robert F., and Jorjani, Soheila (1988). The efficient production of “reputation” by prestige universities in the United States.Journal of Higher Education 59(4): 365–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modern Humanities Research Association (Various years).Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature. London: Modern Humanities Research Association.

  • Tuckman, H. (1976).Publication, Teaching, and the Academic Reward Structure. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, J. M. (1980). The proliferation of scientific literature: A natural process.Science 208(4442): 369–371.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Educational Policy Studies and Evaluation, 145 C Taylor Education Building, University of Kentucky, 40506-0001, Lexington, KY

    Jeffery P. Bieber

Authors
  1. Jeffery P. Bieber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert T. Blackburn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bieber, J.P., Blackburn, R.T. Faculty research productivity 1972–1988: Development and application of constant units of measure. Res High Educ 34, 551–567 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991919

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991919

Keywords

Search

Navigation