Skip to main content
Log in

Incidental learning as a function of anticipated task difficulty

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to demonstrate the effects of motivational arousal, due to anticipated task difficulty, on retention of familiar and unfamiliar incidental materials. Brehm, Wright, Solomon, Silka, and Greenberg (1983) have provided evidence that motivational arousal in immediate anticipation of a task is a nonmonotonic function of task difficulty, with difficult tasks producing a relatively higher level of motivational arousal than easy or impossible tasks. It was predicted that increased motivational arousal would facilitate retention of incidentally presented familiar materials (presumably more easily retained) and interfere with retention of incidentally presented unfamiliar materials (presumably less easily retained). In Study 1, subjects anticipating either an easy or a difficult task were exposed to familiar and unfamiliar first names. The predicted interaction between task difficulty and familiarity on recall of the first names was reliably supported. In Study 2, an impossible task condition was added. The results indicated that an effective impossible condition had not been created. In a third study designed as a procedural modification of Study 2, the predicted nonmonotonic interaction was found. Theoretical implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, J. W., & Feather, N. T. (1966).A theory of achievement motivation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W., Wright, R. A., Solomon, S., Silka, L., & Greenberg, J. (1983). Perceived difficulty, energization, and the magnitude of goal valence.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19 21–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H. (1977). Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model.Motivation and Emotion, 1 283–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. L. (1943).Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukla, A. (1972). Foundations of an attributional theory of performance.Psychological Review, 79 454–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukla, A. (1974). Performance as a function of resultant achievement motivation (perceived ability) and perceived difficulty.Journal of Research in Personality, 7 374–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latta, R. M. (1976). Differential tests of two cognitive theories of performance: Weiner versus Kukla.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallak, M. S. (1970). Effects of expected shock and relevant or irrelevant dissonance on incidental retention.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14 271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallak, M. S., Brock, T. C., & Kiesler, C. A. (1967). Dissonance arousal and task performance in an incidental verbal learning paradigm.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Spence, K. W. (1966). The motivational components of manifest anxiety: Drive and drive stimulation. In C. D. Spielberger, (Ed.),Anxiety and behavior. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, K. W. (1956).Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Goodstein, C. D., & Dahlstrom, W. G. (1958). Complex incidental learning as a function of anxiety and task difficulty.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bergen, A. (1968).Task interruption. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. A. (1982). Perceived motivational arousal as a mediator of the magnitude of goal valence.Motivation and Emotion, 6 161–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. A. (1984). Motivation, anxiety and the difficulty of avoidant control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 1376–1381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relationship of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation.Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18 459–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeigarnik, B. (1927). Das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen.Psychologische Forschung, 9 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

These experiments were ably conducted by Ralph Young, whose help is gratefuly acknowledged. We would like to express our gratitude to Jack Brehm for invaluable suggestions concerning this research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, T., Fultz, J. & Biner, P.M. Incidental learning as a function of anticipated task difficulty. Motiv Emot 9, 71–85 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991551

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991551

Keywords

Navigation