Skip to main content
Log in

Diterpenes, taxonomic markers?

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The chemosystematic potential of the 15 more common diterpene types in vascular plants was evaluated. Oxidation levels and skeletal specializations indicate diterpene biosynthesis to involve contrasting modes in pteridophytes and angiosperms on one hand, and in gymnosperms on the other. In angiosperm lineages diterpene diversification accompanies trends towards increase of herbaceousness and depletion of polyphenols, i.e., towards evolutionary advance. Nevertheless, even closely related families may display disjunctions of diterpene type and substitution. Thus the taxonomic value of this metabolic class remains confined to single (advanced) families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borin, M. R. de M. B., Gottlieb, O. R., 1993: Steroids, taxonomic markers? — Pl. Syst. Evol.184: 41–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, K., 1987: Tribal interrelationships of theAsteraceae. — Cladistics3: 210–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J. D., Hill, R. A., 1991: Dictionary of terpenoids,2. — London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1988: The evolution and classification of flowering plants. — New York: The New York Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dev, S., 1985: CRC Handbook of terpenoids: Diterpenes,I. — Florida: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershenzon, J., Mabry, T. J., 1983: Secondary metabolites and the higher classification of angiosperms. — Nordic J. Bot.3: 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, O. R., 1982: Micromolecular evolution, systematics and ecology. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1989: The role of oxygen in phytochemical evolution towards diversity. — Phytochemistry28: 2545–2558.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1990: Phytochemicals: Differentiation and function. — Phytochemistry29: 1715–1724.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1990: A chemosystematic overview of pteridophytes and gymnosperms. — InKubitzki, K., (Ed.): The families and genera of vascular plants,I. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1993: The role of ellagitannins in the evolution of dicotyledons. — Taxon42: 539–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harborne, J. B., Turner, B. L., 1984: Plant chemosystematics. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaman, F., Bohlman, F., Zdero, C., Mabry, T. J., 1990: Diterpenes of flowering plants.Compositae (Asteraceae). — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A., Sokal, R. R., 1973: Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification. — San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G. L., 1994: Synopsis of the genera and suprageneric taxa ofEuphorbiaceae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.81: 33–144.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Part 36 in the series “Plant chemosystematics and phylogeny”. For Part 35 seeBorin & Gottlieb (1993). Based in part on the doctoral thesis presented byM. R. Figueiredo to Universidade de São Paulo in 1992.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Figueiredo, M.R., Kaplan, M.A.C. & Gottlieb, O.R. Diterpenes, taxonomic markers?. Pl Syst Evol 195, 149–158 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989291

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989291

Key words

Navigation