Abstract
Diminutive plants of the duckweed family have been difficult to study systematically because of reduction and character state losses that have accompanied their adaptation to aquatic habitats. Phylogenetic analysis of flavonoid and anatomical-morphological data indicate that evolution in the family has proceeded in a linear manner from complex ancestors to reduced species of subfam.Wolffioideae. The high probability of convergence for character reduction and loss, however, renders this conclusion tentative. Cladograms from combined data require only a slight increase in length to resolve all four genera as monophyletic. These studies indicate the need for more suitable data to evaluate hypotheses of duckweed relationships.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alston, R. E., 1966: Chemotaxonomy or biochemical systematics? — InSwain, T., (Ed.): Comparative phytochemistry, pp. 33–56. — New York: Academic Press.
Arber, A., 1920: Water plants: a study of aquatic angiosperms. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cavalier-Smith, T., (Ed.) 1985: The evolution of genome size. — New York: Wiley.
Clark, H. L., Thieret, J. W., 1968: The duckweeds of Minnesota. — Michigan Bot.7: 67–76.
Cook, C. D. K., 1990: Aquatic plant book. — The Hague, The Netherlands: SPB Academic Publishing.
Croizat, L., 1971: Gigantomachie botanique: la ‘Theorie du Durian’ contre la ‘Theorie de la Lentille d'Eau.’ — Adansonia11: 47–76.
Dahlgren, R. M. T., Clifford, H. T., Yeo, P. F., 1985: The families of monocotyledons: structure, evolution, and taxonomy. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Daubs, E. H., 1965: A monograph ofLemnaceae. — Illinois Biol. Monogr.34. — Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Dollo, L., 1912: Les Céphalopodes adaptés à la vie nectique secondaire et à la vie benthique tertiaire. — Zool. Jahrb.1 15. Supp.: 105–140.
Engler, A., 1877: Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die morphologischen Verhältnisse derAraceae. — Nova Acta Caes. Leop.-Carol. German. Nat. Cur.39: 135–224.
Godfrey, R. K., Wooten, J. W., 1979: Aquatic and wetland plants of southeastern United States. Monocotyledons. — Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Hartog, C. den, 1975: Thoughts about the taxonomical relationships within theLemnaceae. — Aquatic Bot.1: 407–416.
Hegelmaier, F., 1868: Die Lemnaceen. Eine monographische Untersuchung. — Leipzig: Engelmann.
Hoffman, J. F., 1840: Beiträge zur näheren Kenntnis vonLemna arrhiza nebst einigen Bemerkungen überL. polyrrhiza, L. gibba, L. minor undL. trisulca. — Arch. Naturgesch.6: 138–163.
Horen, F. van, 1869: Observations sur la physiologie des Lemnacées. — Bull. Soc. Bot. Belge8: 15–88.
Landolt, E., 1980a: Key to the determination of taxa within the family ofLemnaceae. — Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH, Stiftung Rübel, Zürich70: 13–21.
—, 1980b: Description of six new species ofLemnaceae. — Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH, Stiftung Rübel, Zürich70: 22–29.
—, 1986: The family ofLemnaceae—a monographic study. — Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH, Stiftung Rübel, Zürich71: 1–563.
—, 1994: Taxonomy and ecology of the sectionWolffia of the genusWolffia (Lemnaceae). — Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH, Stiftung Rübel, Zürich60: 137–151.
Lawalree, A., 1945: La position systematique desLemnaceae et leur classification. — Bull. Soc. Bot. Belge77: 27–38.
Les, D. H., Sheridan, D. J., 1990: Biochemical heterophylly and flavonoid evolution in North AmericanPotamogeton (Potamogetonaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.77: 453–465.
—, 1993: Phylogenetic studies in the monocot subclassAlismatidae: evidence for a reappraisal of the aquatic orderNajadales. — Molec. Phylogenet. Evol.2: 304–314.
McClure, J. W., 1964: Taxonomic significance of the flavonoid chemistry and the morphology of theLemnaceae in axenic culture. — Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
—, 1964: Patterns of selected chemical components ofSpirodela polyrhiza formed under various conditions of axenic culture. — Nature (London)201: 311–313.
—, —, 1966: A chemotaxonomic study ofLemnaceae. — Amer. J. Bot.53: 849–860.
Reznik, H., Menschick, R., 1969: Flavonoide in Sommergliedern und Winterknospen vonSpirodela polyrhiza (L.)Schleid. — Z. Pflanzenphysiol.61: 348–349.
Sargent, J. A., Wangermann, E., 1959: The effect of some growth regulators on the vascular system ofLemna minor. — New Phytol.58: 345–363.
Sculthorpe, C. D., 1967: The biology of aquatic vascular plants. — London: Arnold.
Swofford, D. L., 1993: PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1. — Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey.
Turner, B. L., 1967: Plant chemosystematics and phylogeny. — J. Pure Appl. Chem.14: 189–213.
Urbanska-Worytkiewicz, K., 1980: Cytological variation within the family ofLemnaceae. — Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH, Stiftung Rübel, Zürich70: 30–101.
Veen, J., 1975: Preliminary studies of the flavonoid pattern ofLemna gibba L. andLemna minor L. — Aquatic Bot.1: 417–421.
Voss, E. G., 1972: Michigan flora. PartI: Gymnosperms and monocots. — Bloomfield Hills, Michigan: Cranbrook Institute of Science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Les, D.H., Landolt, E. & Crawford, D.J. Systematics of theLemnaceae (duckweeds): Inferences from micromolecular and morphological data. Pl Syst Evol 204, 161–177 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989203
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989203