Skip to main content
Log in

Sex pheromones and reproductive isolation in four european small ermine moths

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reproductive isolation among four sympatric small ermine moths (Yponomeuta) is analyzed in terms of niches in the sexual communication channel. Potential pheromone components were identified from pheromone gland secretions ofY. evonymellus,Y. cagnagellus,Y. padelius, andY. vigintipunctatus by gas chromatography with flame ionization and electroantennographic detection and tested for behavioral activity in the field. The species were found to share (Z)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (Z11-14: OAc) in combination with varying proportions of theE isomer as primary sex pheromone components.Y. cagnagellus differs from the rest of the species by having only a small amount (1.5%) ofE isomer relative toZ isomer in its pheromone. The closely relatedY. padelius has a three-component pheromone including large amounts (ca. 400%) of (Z)-11-hexadecenyl acetate (Z11–16:OAc) in addition toZ11–14: OAc (100%) andE11–14: OAc (34%).Z11–16: OAc appears to reduce trap catches ofY. evonymellus andY. vigintipunctatus when added to the pheromone. Although these species are the two most distantly related European small ermine moths, they seem to share the same sex pheromone, i.e.,Z11–14∶OAc (+20%E) and (Z)-11-tetradecenol. Our interpretation is that this might have been the sex pheromone of the ancestor of today'sYponomeuta species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arn, H., Städler, E., andRauscher, S. 1975. The electroantennographic detector—a selective and sensitive tool in the gas Chromatographic analysis of insect pheromones.Z. Naturforsch. 30C:722–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjostad, L.B., andRoelofs, W.L. 1983. Sex pheromone biosynthesis inTrichoplusia ni: Key steps involve delta-11 desaturation and chain-shortening.Science 220:1387–1389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, L.I., andMcDonough, L.M. 1979. Insect sex pheromones: Evaporation rates from natural rubber septa.J. Chem. Ecol. 5:825–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, L.I., andMcDonough, L.M. 1981. Insect sex pheromones: Evaporation rates of alcohols and acetates from natural rubber septa.J. Chem. Ecol. 7:627–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrits-Heybroek, E.M., Herrebout, W.M., Ulenberg, S.A., andWiebes, J.T. 1978. Host plant preference of five species of small ermine moths.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24:360–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, M.D., andKarandinos, M.G. 1979. Resource partitioning of the sex communication channel in clearwing moths (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) of Wisconsin.Ecol. Monogr. 49:403–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrikse, A. 1979. Activity patterns and sex pheromone specificity as isolating mechanisms in eight species ofYponomeuta.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 25:172–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrikse, A., Herrebout, W.M., andPersoons, C.J. 1982. Sex pheromones, attractants and inhibitors in small ermine moths: A comparison of bioassays.Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent. 47:493–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrebout, W.M., andvan de Water, T.P.M. 1982. The effect of the hostplant on pheromone communication in a small ermine moth,Yponomeuta cagnagellus (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae).Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent. 47:503–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrebout, W.M., andvan de Water, T.P.M. 1983. Trapping success in relation to height of the traps in small ermine moths (Yponomeuta) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae).Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent. 48:173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrebout, W.M., Kuyten, P.J., andWiebes, J.T. 1976. Small ermine moths and their host relationships.Symp. Biol. Hung. 16:91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heusinger, G. 1982. Ökologie der GespinstmotteYponomeuta padellus L. in Heckensysteme. Tagungsbericht Symposium Hecken und Flurgehölze, Bayreuth, May 17–19, 1982.

  • Löfstedt, C., van der Fers, J.N.C., LÖfqvist, J., Lanne, B.S., Appelgren, M., BergstrÖm, G., andThelin, B. 1982. Sex pheromone components of the turnip mothAgrotis segetum: Chemical identification electrophysiological evaluation and behavioral activity.J. Chem. Ecol. 8:1305–1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markides, K., Blomberg, L., Buijten, J., andWännman, T. 1983. Cyanosilicones as stationary phases in gas chromatography II.J. Chromatogr. 267:29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menken, S.B.J. 1982. Biochemical genetics and systematics of small ermine moths.Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutions-forsch. 20:131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs, W.L., andBrown, R.L. 1982. Pheromones and evolutionary relationships of Tortricidae.Annu. Rev. Syst. 13:395–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Pers, J.N.C. 1982. Comparison of single cell responses of antennal sensilla trichodea to sex attractants in nine European small ermine moths. (Ypomeuta spp.)Entomol. Exp. Appl. 31:255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebes, J.T. 1976. The speciation process in the small ermine moths.Neth. J. Zool. 26:440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand, H. 1962. Die deutschen Arten der GattungYponomeuta Latr.Ber. 9 Wandervers. Dtsch. Entomol., Tagungsber. 45:101–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildbolz, T., andRiggenbach, W. 1965. Beobachtungen und Versuche über Unterschiede zwischen der Apfelgespinstmotte und der Zwetschengespinstmotte.Schweiz. Z. Obst-Weinbau 101:105–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

1 Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae Latr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Löfstedt, C., van der Pers, J.N.C. Sex pheromones and reproductive isolation in four european small ermine moths. J Chem Ecol 11, 649–666 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988574

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988574

Key words

Navigation