Skip to main content
Log in

Bark-beetle pheromones

Enhancement ofDendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) aggregation pheromone by yeast metabolites in laboratory bioassays

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The two major yeasts isolated from the southern pine beetle,Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman, areHansenula holstii Wickerham andPichia pinus (Hoist) Phaff; a third yeast,P. bovis van Uden et do Carmo-Sousa, has been isolated far less frequently. The main volatile metabolites produced by these yeasts are isoamyl alcohol, isoamyl acetate, 2-phenylethanol, and 2-phenylethyl acetate.We have found that certain of these compounds, particularly the esters, can greatly, enhance the attractiveness of a mixture of frontalin:trans-verbenol: turpentine (1:1:12), at certain limiting concentrations, to walking beetles in a laboratory bioassay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R.F. 1948. Host selection by the pine engraver.J. Econ. Entomol. 41:596–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barras, S.J., andPerry, T. 1972. Fungal symbionts in the prothoracic mycangium ofDendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera:Scolytidae).Z. Angew. Entomol. 71:95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, J.M., Bracke, J.W., Markovetz, A.J., Wood, D.L., andBrowne, L.E. 1975. Production of verbenol pheromone by a bacterium isolated from bark beetles.Nature 254:136–137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, J.M., Bracke, J.W., Britton, L.N., Markovetz, A.J., andBarras, S.J. 1976. Bark beetle pheromones: Production of verbenone by a mycangial fungus ofDendroctonus frontalis.J. Chem. Ecol. 2:195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade, S.C., Hrutfiord, B.F., andGara, R.I. 1970. Identification of a primary attractant forGnathotrichus sulcatus isolated from western hemlock logs.J. Econ. Entomol. 63: 1014–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, M., andFoster, J.W. 1958. Experiments with some microorganisms which utilize ethane and hydrogen.J. Bacteriol. 75:592–603.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francke-Grosmann, H. 1963. Some new aspects in forest entomology.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 8:415–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouger, R.J. 1972. Interrelationships ofIps avulsus (Eichh.) and associated fungi.Diss. Abstr. 32:6453-B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, K., 1967. Fungal-insect mutualism in trees and timber.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 12: 105–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, K. 1968. Anaerobic induction of primary chemical attractancy for ambrosia beetles.Can. J. Zool. 46:905–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst, E.C. 1936.Zygosaccharomyces pini, a new species of yeast associated with bark beetles in pines.J. Agric. Res. 53:513–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodder, J. 1970. The Yeasts. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeck, H.A. 1970. Ethanol as the primary attractant for the ambrosia beetle,Trypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera:Scolytidae).Can. Entomol. 102:985–995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeck, H.A. 1971. Field tests of ethanol as a scolytid attractant. Bimonthly Research Notes, Dept. of Fisheries & Forestry, Canada. 27:11–12.

  • Payne, T.L., Hart, E.R., Edson, L.J., McCarty, F.A., Billings, P.M., andCoster, J.E. 1976. Olfactometer for assay of behavioral chemicals for the southern pine beetle,Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera:Scolytidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 2:411–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Person, H.L. 1931. Theory in explanation of the selection of certain trees by the western pine beetle.J. For. 29:696–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, J.A.A., Pitman, G.B., andVité, J.P. 1976. 2-Phenylethanol isolated from bark beetles.Naturwissenschaften 63:198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shifrine, M., andPhaff, H.J. 1956. The association of yeasts with certain bark beetles.Mycologia 48:41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suomalainen, H. 1969. Trends in physiology and biochemistry of yeasts.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Vol. 35,Supplement: Yeast Symposium 1969, pp. 83–111.

  • Vité, J.P. andGara, R.I. 1962. Volatile attractants from ponderosa pine attacked by bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 21:251–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vité, J.P., Gara, R.I., andKliefoth, R.A. 1963. Collection and bioassay of a volatile fraction attractive toIps confusus (LeC.) (Coleoptera:Scolytidae).Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 22:39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, H.S. 1971. Association ofDendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) with blue stain fungi and yeasts during brood development in lodgepole pine.Can. Entomol. 103:1495–1503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D.L. 1972. The selection and colonization of ponderosa pine by bark beetles, pp. 101–117,in H.F. van Emden (ed.). Insect/Plant Relationships. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D.L., andVité, J.P. 1961. Studies on the host selection behavior ofIps confusus (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attackingPinus ponderosa.Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 21:79–95.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by cooperative agreement No. 19-205 with the USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, Pineville, Louisianna 71360, the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Project MS 1525, and the USDA-sponsored program entitled ‘The Expanded Southern Pine Beetle Research and Applications Program’ through CSRS grant 516-15-70. The findings, opinions, and recommendations reported herein are those of the authors, and not necessarily those of the USDA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brand, J.M., Schultz, J., Barras, S.J. et al. Bark-beetle pheromones. J Chem Ecol 3, 657–666 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988065

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988065

Key words

Navigation