Skip to main content
Log in

Maturation and senescence of an insect chemosensory response

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electroantennogram responses of male and femalePseudaletia unipuncta to the two major components of the presumed pheromone associated with the male anterior abdominal scent brushes vary with age. There is a postemergence period of maturation of responsiveness, followed by senescence. The age of maximum responsiveness differs according to the sex and to the compound tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, P.J., Seabrook, W.D., andPaim, U. 1974. Isolation of a sex pheromone receptor in the male eastern spruce budwormChoristoneura fumiferana (Clem.).J. Camp. Physiol. 91:79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, M. 1971. Intrinsic limitations in the use of electroantennograms to bioassay male pheromones in Lepidoptera.Nature 233:57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckh, J. 1969. Electrical activity in olfactory receptor cells, pp. 34–51,in Carl Pfaffmann (ed.). Olfaction and Taste, Vol. III. Rockefeller University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckh, J.,Kaissling, K.-E., andSchneider, D. Insect olfactory receptors. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 30:263–280.

  • Dickens, J.C., andPayne, T.L. 1977. Bark beetle olfaction: Pheromone receptor system inDendroctonus frontalis.J. Insect Physiol. 23:481–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, G.G. 1971. Electroantennogram responses to the scent brush secretions of several male moths.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64:1428–1431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, G.G., Brady, U.E., andBrand, J.M. 1972. Male armyworm scent brush secretion: Identification and electroantennogram study of major components.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65:1224–1227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaissling, K.-E. 1969. Kinetics of olfactory receptor potentials, pp. 52–70,in Carl Pfaffmann (ed.). Olfaction and Taste, Vol. III. Rockefeller University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaissling, K.-E. 1971. Insect olfaction, pp. 351–531,in L.M. Beidler (ed.). Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasang, G., andKaissling, K.-E. 1971. Specificity of primary and secondary olfactory processes in theBombyx antenna, pp. 200–206in D. Schneider (ed.). International Symposium on Olfaction and Taste, Vol. IV. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, T.L., Shorey, H.H., andGaston, L.K. 1970. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths: Factors influencing antennal responsiveness in males ofTrichoplusia ni.J. Insect Physiol. 16:1043–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs, W.L. 1977. The scope and limitations of the electroantennogram technique in identifying pheromone components, pp. 147–168, in N.R. McFarlane (ed.). Crop Protection Agents. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs, W.L., andComeau, A. 1971a. Sex pheromone perception: Synergists and attractants for the redbanded leafroller attractant.J. Insect Physiol. 17:435–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs, W.L., andComeau, A. 1971b. Sex pheromone perception: Electroantennogram responses of the redbanded leaf roller moth.J. Insect Physiol. 17:1969–1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, E.S., Sanes, J.R., andHildebrand, J.G. 1976. Ontogeny of electroantennogram responses in the mothManduca sexta.J. Insect Physiol. 22:955–960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, H.H., andGaston, L.K. 1964. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. III. Inhibition of male responses to the sex pheromone inTrichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 57:775–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, H.H., andHale, R.L. 1965. Mass rearing of larvae of nine noctuid species on a simple artificial medium.J. Econ. Entomol. 58:522–524.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by NSF grant BNS76-10268 and grants from the Killam Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seabrook, W.D., Hirai, K., Shorey, H.H. et al. Maturation and senescence of an insect chemosensory response. J Chem Ecol 5, 587–594 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987843

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987843

Key words

Navigation