Abstract
The research paradigm that Ickes and his colleagues (Ickes, Robertson, Tooke, & Teng, 1986; Ickes & Tooke, 1988) have developed for the study of naturalistic social cognition was used to explore the phenomenon ofintersubjectivity as it naturally occurs in the initial, unstructured interactions of same-sex (male-male and female-female) dyads. The results of two studies revealed evidence of greater similarity (i.e., convergence) in the thought-feeling content of the male dyad members than in that of the female dyad members on measures pertaining to the quality of their reported feelings. These findings were consistent with the assumption that, due to a normatively narrower range of affective involvement in the male-male dyads, the male dyad members were more likely than the female dyad members to monitor closely the emotional tone of their interaction. In direct support of this assumption, there was significantly less nonverbal involvement (i.e., gesturing, smiling, gazing, mutual gaze) in the male-male dyads in both studies, along with corresponding differences in the variability of these behaviors. In addition, the results of both studies revealed serendipitous evidence of greater similarity in the thought-feeling content of the female, than of the male, dyad members on measures pertaining to the degree of metaperspective taking and to thoughts and feelings about other people. The discussion emphasized the need for theorists and researchers in cognitive social psychology to address those genuinelysocial-cognitive (i.e., intersubjective) phenomena that have traditionally been ignored.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelson, R.P. (1976). Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. In J.S. Carroll & J.W. Payne (Eds.),Cognition and social behavior. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Abelson, R.P. (1981). The psychological status of the script concept.American Psychologist, 36 715–729.
Altman, I., & Taylor, D.H. (1973).Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Antill, J.K. (1983). Sex role complementarity versus similarity in married couples.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 145–155.
Asch, S.E. (1952).Social Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Bem, S.L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45 196–205.
Brock, T.C. (1967). Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3 269–309.
Cacioppo, J.T., & Petty, R.E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. In T. Merluzzi, C. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.),Cognitive Assessment (pp. 309–342). New York: Guilford.
Cronbach, L.J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on understanding of others and assuming “similarity.”Psychological Bulletin, 52 177–193.
Fincham, F., & O'Leary, K.D. (1983). Causal inferences for spouse behavior in maritally distressed and nondistressed couples.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1 42–57.
Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (1984).Social Cognition. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Goffman, E. (1969).Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gottman, J.M. (1979).Marital Interaction: Experimental Investigations. New York: Academic Press.
Greenwald, A.G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In A.G. Greenwald, T.C. Brock, & T.M. Ostrom (Eds.),Psychological Foundations of Attitudes (pp. 147–170). New York: Academic Press.
Heider, F. (1958).The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
Ickes, W. (1981). Sex-role influences in dyadic interaction: A theoretical model. In C. Mayo & N. Henley (Eds.),Gender and Nonverbal Behavior (pp. 95–128). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ickes, W. (1982). A basic paradigm for the study of personality, roles, and social behavior. In W. Ickes & E.S. Knowles (Eds.),Personality, Roles, and Social Behavior (pp. 305–341). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ickes, W. (1983). A basic paradigm for the study of unstructured dyadic interaction. In H. Reis (Ed.),New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science (pp. 5–21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ickes, W. (1985). Sex-role influences on compatibility in relationships. In W. Ickes (Ed.),Compatible and Incompatible Relationships (pp. 187–208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ickes, W., & Barnes, R.D. (1977). The role of sex and self-monitoring in unstructured dyadic interactions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 315–330.
Ickes, W., Robertson, E., Tooke, W., & Teng, G. (1986). Naturalistic social cognition: Methodology, assessment, and validation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 66–82.
Ickes, W., Schermer, B., & Steeno, J. (1979). Sex and sex-role influences in same-sex dyads.Social Psychology Quarterly, 42 373–385.
Ickes, W., & Tooke, W. (1988). The observational method: Studying the interaction of minds and bodies. In S. Duck (Ed.),The Handbook of Personal Relationships: Theory, Research, and Interventions. Chichester: Wiley, 79–97.
Ickes, W., & Turner, M. (1983). On the social advantages of having an older, opposite-sex sibling: Birth-order influences in mixed-sex dyads.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 210–222.
Kenny, D.A. (1988). The analysis of data from two-person relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.),The Handbook of Personal Relationships: Theory, Research, and Interventions. Chichester: Wiley, 57–77.
Laing, R.D., Phillipson, H., & Lee, A.R. (1966).Interpersonal Perception: A Theory and Method of Research. New York: Harper & Row.
Lamke, L.K., & Bell, N.J. (1982). Sex-role orientation and relationship development in same-sex dyads.Journal of Research in Personality, 16 343–354.
Langer, E.J. (1978). Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. Kidd (Eds.),New Directions in Attribution Research (Vol. 2, pp. 35–58). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Markus, H., & Zajonc, R.B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),The Handbook of Social Psychology: Third Edition (pp. 137–230). New York: Random House.
Mead, G.H. (1934).Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945).Phenomenologie de la Perception. Paris: Gallimard.
Sartre, J.P. (1943).L'Etre et le Neant. Paris: Gallimard. (Transl. H. Barnes,Being and Nothingness. New York: Washington Square Press, 1966.)
Scheler, M. (1923).Wesen und Formen der Sympathie (2nd ed.). Bonn: Friedrich Cohen. (Transl. P. Heath,The Nature of Sympathy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1954).
Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R.P. (1977).Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry Into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Schutz, A. (1942). Scheler's theory of intersubjectivity and the general thesis of alter ego.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2 323–347.
Schutz, A. (1948). Sartre's theory of the alter ego.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 9 181–199.
Schutz, A. (1970).On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Shaver, P., Pullis, C., & Olds, D. (1980). Report on the LHJ ‘Intimacy Today” Survey. Private research report to the publishers of theLadies' Home Journal.
Sillars, A.L. (1981). Attributions and interpersonal conflict resolution. In J.H. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R.F. Kidd (Eds.),New Directions in Attribution Research (Vol. 3, pp. 279–305). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Sillars, A.L. (1985). Interpersonal perception in relationships. In W. Ickes (Ed.),Compatible and Incompatible Relationships (pp. 277–305). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Swann, W.B., Jr. (1984). Quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics.Psychological Review, 4 457–477.
Tooke, W., & Ickes, W. (1988). A measure of adherence to conventional morality.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6 310–334.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors would like to express their appreciation to Kristine Arnold, Ray Bristow, Robin Klemick, Laurie Luce, Julie Williams, and Mari Wilson for their assistance in coding the data for the studies reported here.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ickes, W., Tooke, W., Stinson, L. et al. Naturalistic social cognition: Intersubjectivity in same-sex dyads. J Nonverbal Behav 12, 58–82 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987352
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987352