Skip to main content
Log in

Self-touching and attentional processes: The role of task difficulty, selection stage, and sex differences

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lateral and bilateral self-touching movements were studied in a group of men and women performing a series of attentional tasks. In all tasks, subjects were instructed to selectively attend to, and “shadow” (i.e., repeat outloud), one of two passages that were presented simultaneously through earphones. Loudness, voice quality, or thematic content determined which passage had to be selected and shadowed. Performance was significantly better when shadowing on the basis of loudness or voice quality (an earlier, easier selection) than when following content (a more difficult selection that occurs at a later stage in the information processing continuum). However, self-touching rates during performance were not simply a function of task difficulty but seemed to depend on the processing stage at which selection occurred as well as on the type of selection involved. Strong, significant associations emerged between lateral self-touching and performance measures in most of the tasks for the women but in only one task for the men. The sample size on which these correlations are based is small and, hence, these findings must be interpreted with caution. However, in the light of previous findings on sex differences with these tasks, the present results suggest that lateral movements may serve different functions in men and women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barroso, F., Freedman, N., & Grand, S. Self-touching, performance, and attentional processes.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1980,50 1083–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barroso, F., Freedman, N., Grand, S., & van Meel, J. The evocation of two types of hand movements in information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1978,4 321–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, M., Korchin, S.J., Beall, L., & Kiritz, S. Sex differences in the relationship between trait anxiety and auditory selective attention.Journal of Auditory Research 1974,14 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, N. The analysis of movement behavior during the clinical interview. In A. Sigman & B. Pope (Eds.),Studies in dyadic communication. New York: Pergamon Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, N., & Hoffman, S.P. Kinetic behavior in altered clinical states: Approach to objective analysis of motor behavior during clinical interviews.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1967,24 527–539.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, N., & Steingart, I. Kinesic internalization and language construction. In D.P. Spence (Ed.),Psychoanalysis and contemporary science. Vol. IV. New York: International Universities Press, 1975. Pp. 335–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, N., O'Hanlon, J., Oltman, P., & Witkin, H. The imprint of psychological differentiation on kinetic behavior in varying communicative contexts.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1972,79 239–258.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, N., Barroso, F., Bucci, W., & Grand, S. The bodily manifestations of listening.Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought 1978,1 157–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A.M. Contextual cues in selective listening.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1960,12 242–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A.M. Strategies and models of selective attention.Psychological Review 1969,76 282–299.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We are grateful to Dr. Norbert Freedman, Director of the Unit at which this work was carried out, for his encouragement and support during all phases of this project, and to Dr. Marshall Bush for generously making available to us his selective listening tasks. Some findings reported in this paper were included in the second author's master's thesis at New York University, Department of Psychology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barroso, F., Feld, J.K. Self-touching and attentional processes: The role of task difficulty, selection stage, and sex differences. J Nonverbal Behav 10, 51–64 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987205

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987205

Keywords

Navigation