Abstract
This study investigated the effects of touch on compliance to a help request. The experimenter's initiation of touch during the request did increase compliance as measured by time spent scoring bogus personality inventories. The hypothesized role of attraction in mediating the touch-compliance link was not supported. Instead, touch may have served to indicate status or power differences that influenced subjects to comply. A sex of subject × sex of experimenter interaction was manifested in female subjects complying more to female experimenters than did subjects in any other sex pairing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baron, R.A. Invasions of personal space and helping: Mediating effects of invader's apparent need.Journal of Experimental Social psychology 1978,14 304–312.
Brehm, J.A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press, 1966.
Brockner, J., Pressman, B., Cabitt, J., & Moran, P. Nonverbal intimacy, sex and compliance: A field study.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 1982,6 253–258.
Bull, R., & Gibson-Robinson, E. The influence of eye-gaze, style of dress, and locality on the amounts of money donated to a charity.Human Relations 1986,34 845–905.
Crowne, D.R., & Marlowe, D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.Journal of Consulting Psychology 1960,24 349–354.
Edinger, J.A., & Patterson, M.L. Nonverbal involvement and social control.Psychological Bulletin 1983,93 30–56.
Ellsworth, P.C., & Langer, E.J. Staring and approach: An interpretation of the stare as a nonspecific activator.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1976,33 117–122.
Henley, N.M. Status and sex: Some touching observations.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1973,2 91–93.
Henley, N.M.Body Politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
Kleinke, C.L. Compliance to requests made by gazing and touching experimenters in field settings.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1977,13 218–223.
Kleinke, C.L. Interaction between gaze and legitimacy of request on compliance in a field setting.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 1980,5 3–12.
Kleinke, C.L., & Singer, D.A. Influence of gaze on compliance with demanding and conciliatory requests in a field setting.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1979,5 386–390.
Major, B., & Heslin, R. Perceptions of cross-sex and same-sex nonreciprocal touch: It is better to give than to receive.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 1982,6 148–162.
Mehrabian, A.Nonverbal communication. Chicago: Aldine, 1972.
Snyder, M. Self-monitoring of expressive behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1974,30 526–537.
Watson, D., & Friend, R. Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1969,33 448–457.
Willis, F.N., & Hamm, H.K. The use of interpersonal touch in securing compliance.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 1980,6 49–55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors would like to thank James Daly and Kay McIntyre for their help in conducting this study. Completion of this project was supported by Weldon Spring Research Grant from the University of Missouri to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patterson, M.L., Powell, J.L. & Lenihan, M.G. Touch, compliance, and interpersonal affect. J Nonverbal Behav 10, 41–50 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987204
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987204