Abstract
An important, but frequently overlooked, issue in qualitative research is how the status characteristics of the researcher affect the process of gaining access to, establishing, and maintaining rapport with respondents or informants in a setting. Some researchers may never succeed in achieving more than superficial acceptance from their respondents because of the status each researcher occupies. Female researchers studying male-dominated groups frequently find themselves in just such a position or do not attempt to gain entry in certain male-dominated settings. Sex-role expectations may hamper women's work in the field. Until recently, little attention was given to these issues.
This paper discusses the dilemmas faced by female researchers in male-dominated settings. It begins by examining how the instructional fieldwork literature addresses this issue and finds that it generally does not. In addition, the literature's advice to novice fieldworkers, while perhaps appropriate for males, may be inappropriate for females, given stereotypical sex-role expectations. Novice female researchers must turn to accounts of experienced female researchers for discussions of problems they may encounter in field settings. The paper then turns to my study of a prosecutor's office. Similarities between my experiences and those of other female researchers are noted, and suggestions are made about how women in the field can manage and even overcome these problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bogdan, Robert and Stephen J. Taylor 1975 Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Phenomenological Approach to the Social Sciences. New York: Wiley.
Broadhead, Robert S. 1980 “Qualitative analysis in evaluation research: Problems and promises of an interactionist approach.” Symbolic Interaction 3 (Spring): 23–40.
1983 “Self-deception and self-discovery in fieldwork.” Qualitative Sociology 6 (Fall): 195–214.
1967 “The low-caste stranger in social research” Pp. 267–96 in G. Sjoberg (ed.) Ethics, Politics, and Social Research. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
Danziger, Sandra K. 1979 “On doctor watching: Fieldwork in medical settings.” Urban Life 7 (January): 513–32.
Douglas, Jack D. 1976 Investigative Social Research: Individual and Team Field Research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Easterday, Lois, Diana Papademas, Laura Schorr, and Catherine Valentine 1977 “The making of a female researcher: role problems in field work.” Urban Life 6: 333–48.
Feldman, Elliot J. 1981 A Practical Guide to the Conduct of Field Research in the Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Fox, Renee C. 1964 “An American sociologist in the land of Belgian medical research.” Pp. 345–91 in P. Hammond (ed.) Sociologists at Work: Essays on the Craft of Social Research. New York: Basic Books.
Geer, Blanche 1964 “First days in the field.” Pp. 322–44 in P. Hammond (ed.) Sociologists at Work: Essays on the Craft of Social Research. New York: Basic Books.
Georges, Robert A. and Michael O. Jones 1980 People Studying People: The Human Element in Fieldwork. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Goffman, Erving 1961 Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Golde, Peggy (ed.) 1970 Women in the Field: Anthropological Experiences. Chicago: Aldine.
Gray, Paul S. 1980 “Exchange and access in field work.” Urban Life 9 (October): 309–31.
Gurney, Joan Neff 1982 “Implementing a national crime control program: The case of an economic crime unit.” Pp. 33–46 in M. Morash (ed.) Implementing Criminal Justice Policies. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Hoffman, Joan E. 1980 “Problems of access in the study of social elites and boards of directors.” Pp. 45–56 in W. B. Shaffir, R. A. Stebbins, and A. Turowetz (eds.) Fieldwork Experience: Qualitative Approaches to Social Research. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Johnson, John M. 1975 Doing Field Research. New York: The Free Press.
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss 1977 Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Lofland, John 1971 Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Lofland, John and Lyn H. Lofland 1984 Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis, 2nd edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Mann, Brenda J. 1976 “The ethics of fieldwork in an urban bar.” Pp. 95–109 in M. A. Rynkiewich and J. P. Spradley (eds.) Ethics and Anthropology: Dilemmas in Fieldwork. New York: Wiley.
Martin, Susan E. 1978 “Sexual politics in the workplace: The interactional world of policewomen.” Symbolic Interaction 1 (Spring): 44–60.
McC. Pastner, Carroll 1982 “Rethinking the role of the woman field worker in purdah societies.” Human Organization 41 (Fall): 262–64.
Olesen, Virginia L. and Elvi Waik Whittaker 1970 “Role-making in participant observation: Processes in the researcher-actor relationship.” Pp. 381–97 in Norman K. Denzin (ed.) Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine.
Papanek, Hanna 1964 “The woman field worker in a purdah society.” Human Organization 23: 160–63.
Patton, Michael Quinn 1980 Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
1983 “Women in the police: Integration or separation?” Qualitative Sociology 6 (Summer): 118–35.
1981 Policing: The Occupation and the Introduction of Female Officers. Washington, D. C.: University Press of America.
Rovner-Pieczenik, Roberta 1976 “Another kind of education: researching urban justice.” Pp. 465–73 in M. P. Golden (ed.) The Research Experience. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
Schatzman, Leonard and Anselm L. Strauss 1973 Field Research: Strategies for a Natural Sociology. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Schwartz, Howard and Jerry Jacobs 1979 Qualitative Sociology: A Method to the Madness. New York: The Free Press.
Scott, W. Richard 1963 “Field work in a formal organization: some dilemmas in the role of observer.” Human Organization 22: 162–68.
Thorne, Barrie 1979 “Political activist as participant observer: Conflicts of commitment in a study of the draft resistance movement of the 1960's.” Symbolic Interaction 2 (Spring): 73–88.
Warren, Carol A. B. and Paul K. Rasmussen 1977 “Sex and gender in field research.” Urban Life 6: 349–69.
1979 “Gender and age in fieldwork and fieldwork education: no good thing is done by any man alone.” Social Problems 26: 509–22.
1971 Doing Fieldwork: Warnings and Advice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
1952 “Field methods and techniques: reciprocity as a field technique.” Human Organization 11: 34–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gurney, J.N. Not one of the guys: The female researcher in a male-dominated setting. Qual Sociol 8, 42–62 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987013
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987013