Skip to main content
Log in

Preference of certain scolytidae for different conifers

A statistical approach

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nine Scolytidae (Cryphalus piceae, Cryphalus abietis, Pityokteines curvidens, Dendroctonus micans, Ips sexdentatus, Ips typographus,Orthotomicus erosus, Tomicus piniperda, andPhloeosinus bicolor) were subjected to olfaction tests on ten conifer species taken two by two. These conifers wereAbies cephalonica, Abies nordmanniana, Picea abies, Picea orientalis, Pinus pinaster, Pinus sylvestris, Pinus brutia, Pinus laricio,Cupressus atlantica, andCupressus sempervirens. A statistical study of the results, by means of the factorial analysis of correspondence completed by the duo preference test, commonly used in sensory analysis, revealed a taxonomic clustering by genus of the plant species and analogous specific attraction behavior for the insects.Pityokteines curvidens has a behavior analogous to that of the twoCryphalus considered.Phloesinus bicolor shows a very strong specificity forCupressus. The essential oils of the conifers were analyzed to determine their terpene composition and the ten odor spectra thus obtained were compared. The hierarchical classification, using a Euclidian distance, brought out similarities in the spectra, especially in the case ofPinus. It is shown that definitive establishment of Scolytidae is not due to the presence in the odor spectrum of any particular terpenoid. The attractive power of a species results from the synergism of the different terpenes. Moreover the definitive establishment of the insects also depends on their sensorial adaptation to volatile substances which can be wider or narrower for the species studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, J.E., andNorris, D. M. 1968a. Further biological and chemical aspects of host selection byScolytus multistriatus.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 61:1248–1255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J.E., andNorris, D.M. 1968b. Behavioral responses of smaller European Elm bark beetleScolytus multistriatus, to extract of non-host tree tissues.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 11:464–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, R.Z. 1966. Nature of resistance of pines to bark beetles, pp. 197–201,in H.D. Gerhold, E.J. Schreiner, R.E. McDermott, and J.A. Winieski. Breeding Pest-Resistant Trees. Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chararas, C. 1958. Rôle attractif de certains composants des oléorésines à l'égard des Scolytidae des résineux.C.R. Acad. Sci. 247:1653–1654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chararas, C. 1959. L'attractivité exercée par les conifèeres à l'égard des Scolytidae et le rôle des substances terpéniques extraites des oléorésines.Rev. Pathol. Végét. Entomol. Agric. 38:113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chararas, C. 1960. Le chimiotropisme chez les Scolytidae et le rôle des substances terpéniques.Congr. Int. Vienne 2:249–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chararas, C. 1962. Etude biologique des Scolytidae des coniferes. Ed. Lechevalier, Paris, 556 pp.

  • Chararas, C., andMsadda, K. 1970. Attraction chimique et attraction sexuelle chez lesOrthotomicus erosus (Coléoptère: Scolytidae).C.R. Acad. Sci. 273D:1877–1879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chararas, C. 1973. Attraction chimique exercée par divers conifères sur trois Scolytidae du genreOrthotomicus. C.R. Soc. Biol. Fr. 165(5):634–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chararas, C. 1980. Ecophysiologie des insectes parasites des forêts. Ed. Chararas, Paris, 297 pp.

  • Chararas, C., Riviere, J., Ducauze, C., Delpui, G., Rutledge, D., andGazelles, M.-T. 1980. Bioconversion d'un composé terpénique sous l'action d'une bactérie du tube digestif dePMoeosinus armatus.C.R. Acad. Sci. 291D:299–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J.B. 1975. BMDP Statistical Software. University of California-Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhold, H.D. 1966. In quest of insect-resistant forest trees, pp. 305–318,in H.D. Gerhold, E.J., Schreiner, R.E. McDermott, and J.A. Winieski. Breeding Pest-Resistant Trees. Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitz, E., andIshaaya, I. 1972. Behavioural response or the fruit tree bark beetleScolytus mediterraneus, to host and nonhost plants.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 15:175–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, P.R.,andPitman, G.B. 1970. A method for observing and recording the flight behavior of tethered bark beetles in response to chemical messengers.Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 24:329–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebart, L., andFenelon, J.P. 1973. Statistique et Informatique apliquées, 2nd ed. Dunod, Paris, 457 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustaparta, H. 1975. Behavioural responses of the pine weevilHylobius abietis (col. Curculionidae) to odors activating different groups of reception cells.J. Comp. Physiol. 102:57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijholt, W.W., andSchönherr, J. 1976. Chemical response behaviour of scolytids in West Germany and western Canada. Bi-mon Res Notes, 32(6):31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, H., Perttunen, V., andKangas, E. 1970. Studies on the chemical factors involved in the olfactory orientation ofBlastophagus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 24(13):299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozols, G.,Biceuskis, M., andGalvans, U. 1973. Terpenes and Their Complexes as Primary Attractants for Bark Beetles, pp. 24–28. Zashchita lesa-Riga, Latvian SSR Izdatel stvo Zinatne.

  • Perttunen, V. 1970. Aspects of the external and internal factors affecting the olfactory orientation ofBlastophagus piniperda.Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 24:293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitman, G.B. 1971.Transverbenol and α-pinene: Their utility in manipulation of the mountain pine beetle.J. Econ. Entomol. 64:426–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, J.A.A., andVité, J.P. 1970. Systems of chemical communication inDendroctonus.Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 24(13):283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, J.A.A., Hughes, P.R., andTantetin, J. 1973. Oxidation products of pinene in the bark beetleDendroctonus frontalis.J. Insect Physiol. 19:1735–1740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roessler, E.B., Pangborn, R.M., Sidel, J.L., andStone, H. 1978. Expanded statistical tables for estimating significance in paired-preference, paired difference, duo-trio and triangle tests.J. Food Sci. 43:940–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudinsky, J.A. 1966a. Scolytid beetles associated with Douglas fir: Response to terpenes. Science 152:218–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudinsky, J.A. 1966b. Observation on olfactory behaviour of scolytid beetles associated with Douglas fir forest.Z. Angew. Entomol. 58:356–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.H. 1966. Resin quality as a factor in the resistance of pines to bark beetles, pp. 189–196,in H.D. Gerhold, E.J. Schreiner, R.E. McDermott, and J.A. Winieski. Breeding Pest-Resistant Trees. Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chararas, C., Revolon, C., Feinberg, M. et al. Preference of certain scolytidae for different conifers. J Chem Ecol 8, 1093–1109 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986980

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986980

Key words

Navigation