Abstract
This research first clusters campaign activities in state legislative elections into five empirically justified and conceptually meaningful clusters: direct attempts to persuade voters, obtaining the support of other elites, attempts to increase turnout, seeking endorsements from other political officials, and fund raising. Indices created from these clusters are then compared to the situational factors of incumbency and competition as predictors of election outcomes. Data are surveys of candidates for the Louisiana legislature in which they were asked about the conduct of their campaigns and their relative emphasis on various activities. Incumbency was by far the best predictor of what percentage of the vote a candidate obtained, and in open seat contests, expenditures and competition best predicted outcome. Overall, the campaign activities had very little relationship to outcome when controlling for situational factors. Variations occurred between the House and Senate races with implications for challengers' strategies and campaign financing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamany, D. (1927).Campaign Finance in America. North Seituate, Mass.: Duxbury.
Adrian, C. (1952). “Some General Characteristics of Non-Partisan Elections.”American Political Science Review 46 (September).
Agranoff, R. (1976).The Management of Election Campaigns. Boston: Holbrook.
Atkin, C., and G. Heald (1976). “Effects of Political Advertising.”Public Opinion Quarterly 40: 216–228.
Bailey, K. (1978).Methods of Social Research. New York: The Free Press.
Blydenburgh, Jr. (1971). “A Controlled Experiment to Measure the Effects of Personal Campaigning.”Midwest Journal of Political Science 15: 365–81.
Buchanan, W., and A. Bird (1966).Money as a Campaign Resource: Tennessee Democratic Senatorial Primaries 1948–64. Princeton, N.J.: Citizens Research Foundation.
Caldeira, G., and S. Patterson (1982). “Bringing Home the Votes: Electoral Outcomes in State Legislative Races.”Political Behavior 4: 33–68.
Congressional Quarterly (1980).Elections 80. Washington, D. C.: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Conway, M. (1968). “Voter Information Sources in a Nonpartisan Local Election.”Western Political Quarterly 21.
Crotty, W. (1971). “Party Effort and Its Impact on the Vote.”American Political Science Review 65: 439–50.
DeVries, W. (1975). “Taking the Voter's Pulse.” In R. Hiebert, R. Jones, J. D'Arc Lorenz, and E. Lotito (eds.),The Political Image Merchants. Washington, D.C.: Acropolis Books.
Eldersveld, S. (1956). “Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting Behavior.”American Political Science Review 50.
Eulau, H., B. Zisk, and K. Prewitt (1966). “Latent Partisanship in Nonpartisan Elections: Effects of Political Milieu and Mobilization.” In K. Jennings and H. Ziegler (eds.),The Electoral Process. Englewood Cliffs. N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 208–237.
Grush, J., K. McKeough, R. Ahlering (1978). “Extrapolating Laboratory Exposure Research to Actual Political Elections.”Journal of Personality (March).
Hawley, W. (1973).Non-Partisan Elections and the Case for Party Politics. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Heard, A. (1962).The Costs of Democracy. New York: Doubleday.
Hershey, M. (1974).The Making of Campaign Strategy. Lexington: D. C. Heath.
Hofstetter, C. R., and T. Buss (1980). “Politics and the Last Minute Political Television.”Western Political Quarterly (March).
Howell, S., and W. Oiler (1981). “Campaign Activities and Local Election Outcome.”Social Science Quarterly (March).
Huckshorn, R., and R. Spencer (1971).The Politics of Defeat. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Jacobson, E. (1978). “The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections.”American Political Science Review (June).
Johnston R. (1979). “Campaign Expenditure and the Efficacy of Advertising at the 1974 General Election in England.”Political Studies (March).
Kaid, L. (1976). “Measures of Political Advertising.”Journal of Advertising Research (October).
Kingdon, J. (1958).Candidates for Office, Beliefs and Strategies. New York: Random House.
Kramer, G. (1970–71). “The Effects of Precinct-Level Canvassing on Voter Behavior.”Public Opinion Quarterly 34: 560–72.
Leege, D., and W. Francis (1974).Political Research. New York: Basic Books
Leuthold, D. (1968).Electioneering in a Democracy. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
McDevitt, R. (1979). “The Changing Dynamics of Fund Raising in House Campaign.” In Herbert E. Alexander (ed.),Political Finance. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Mendelsohn H., and G. O'Keefe (1976).The People Choose a President: A Study of Vote Decisions in the Making. New York: Praeger.
Milbraith, L., and M. Goel (1977).Political Participation, 2nd ed. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
Mileur, J., and G. Sulzner (1974).Campaigning for the Massachusetts Senate. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Patterson, T., and R. McClure (1976).The Unseeing Eye. New York: Putnam's.
Price, D., and M. Lupfer (1973). “Volunteers for Gore: The Impact of a Precinct-Level Canvass in Three Tennessee Cities.“Journal of Politics 354:410–38.
Wanat, J. (1974). “Political Broadcast Advertising and Primary Election Voting.”Journal of Broadcasting 18.
Welch, W. (1976). “The Effectiveness of Expenditures in State Legislative Races.”American Politics Quarterly 4.
Welch, W. (1979). “Patterns of Contribution: Economic Interest and Ideological Groups” In Herbert E. Alexander (ed.),Political Finance. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Williams, O., and C. Adrian (1959). “The Insulation of Local Politics Under the Nonpartisan Ballot.”American Political Science Review 35 (December).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Howell, S.E. Campaign activities and state election outcomes. Polit Behav 4, 401–417 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986971
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986971