Skip to main content
Log in

An unusual homostyle inHedyotis caerulea (Rubiaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hedyotis caerulea, a spring flowering herb widely distributed in eastern North America, has distylous flowers that differ by a number of morphological and physiological traits. The presence of a strong incompatibility system is indicated by the fact that intramorph crosses or self-pollinations produced little or no seed and intermorph crosses produced copious seed. An unusual homostyle was located that had most floral characters intermediate between pin and thrum flowers, although its pollen size was that of pin. The homostyle was only moderately self-compatible, and its pollen did not behave as pin pollen on thrum stigmas. It appears that, despite their intermediate position and morphology, the homostyle stigmas were fundamentally pin. Although the exceptional rarity of the homostyle suggests that it is an inadaptive failure, workers should watch for its further occurrence since additional study of it may provide insights into the genetic and physiological basis of heterostyly in theRubiaceae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bir Bahadur, 1968: Heterostyly inRubiaceae: a review. J. Osmania Univ. (Science), Golden Jubilee Special Volume, 207–238.

  • Crosby, J. L., 1949: Selection of an unfavorable gene-complex. Evolution3, 212–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C., 1877: The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, A., 1936a: Weitere Untersuchungen zur Phänanalyse, zum Fertilitätsproblem und zur Genetik heterostyler Primeln. 2.Primula hortensis Wettstein. Arch. d. J. Klaus-Stiftg.11, 1–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1936b: Heterostylieforschung. Versuche zur genetischen Analyse eines Organisations- und „Anpassungs“-Merkmales. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.-u. Vererbungsl.71, 156–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1955: Self-fertility in monomorphic Primulas. Genetica27, 391–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganders, F. R., 1975: Fecundity in distylous and self-incompatible homostylous plants ofMitchella repens (Rubiaceae). Evolution29, 186–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., 1954: Comparative incompatibility in angiosperms and fungi. Advances in Genetics6, 235–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K., 1950: The genetical architecture of heterostyly inPrimula sinensis. Evolution4, 340–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, T., 1880: Dimorphic flowers inHoustonia. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia32, 349–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff, R., 1970: Relationships in thePiriqueta caroliniana-P. cistoides complex (Turneraceae). J. Arnold Arb.51, 492–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1972: The breakdown of trimorphic incompatibility inOxalis sectionCorniculatae. Evolution26, 52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, P. M., andChisaki, H. F., 1957: Studies onAmsinckia. I. A synopsis of the genus, with a study of heterostyly in it. Amer. J. Bot.44, 529–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothrock, J. T., 1868: The fertilization of flowering plants. Amer. Naturalist1, 64–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ornduff, R. An unusual homostyle inHedyotis caerulea (Rubiaceae). Pl Syst Evol 127, 293–297 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985992

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985992

Key words

Navigation