Skip to main content
Log in

Product-limit survival functions with correlated survival times

  • Published:
Lifetime Data Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple variance estimator for product-limit survival functions is demonstrated for survival times with nested errors. Such data arise whenever survival times are observed within clusters of related observations. Greenwood's formula, which assumes independent observations, is not appropriate in this situation. A robust variance estimator is developed using Taylor series linearized values and the between-cluster variance estimator commonly used in multi-stage sample surveys. A simulation study shows that the between-cluster variance estimator is approximately unbiased and yields confidence intervals that maintain the nominal level for several patterns of correlated survival times. The simulation study also shows that Greenwood's formula underestimates the variance when the survival times are positively correlated within a cluster and yields confidence intervals that are too narrow. Extension to life table methods is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • G. S. Bieler and R. L. Williams, “Cluster Sampling Techniques in Quantal Response Teratology and Developmental Toxicity Studies.”Biometrics, to appear, 1995.

  • R. Crouchley and A. Pickles, “A Specification Test for Univariate and Multivariate Proportional Hazards Models.”Biometrics vol. 49 pp. 1067–1076, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Crowder and D. J. Hand,Analysis of Repeated Measures, Chapman and Hall: New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. T. Danahy, D. T. Burwell, W. S. Aronow, and R. Prakash, “Sustained Hemodynamic and Antianginal Effect of High Dose Oral Isosorbide Dinitrate,”Circulation vol. 52 pp. 381–387, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Folsom, L. M. LaVange, and R. L. Williams, “A Probability Sampling Perspective on Panel Survey Data Analysis,” inPanel Surveys (D. Kasprzyk, G. Duncan, G. Kalton, and M. P. Singh, eds.), Wiley: New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Greenwood, “The Natural Duration of Cancer.”Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects vol. 33 pp. 1–26. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. H. Hansen, W. N. Hurwitz, and W. G. Madow,Sample Survey Methods and Theory, Volume I, Wiley: New York, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Haseman and L. Kupper, “Analysis of Dichotomous Response Data from Certain Toxicological Experiments,”Biometrics vol. 35 pp. 281–293, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. D. Kalbfleisch and R. L. Prentice,The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data Wiley: New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. L. Kaplan and P. Meier, “Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations.”Journal of the American Statistical Association vol. 58 pp. 457–481, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Kish and M. Frankel, “Inference from Complex Samples” (with discussion).Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B vol. 36 pp. 1–37, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. G. Koch, W. D. Johnson, and H. D. Tolley, “A Linear Models Approach to Analysis of Survival and Extent of Disease in Multidimensional Contingency Tables.”Journal of the American Statistical Association vol. 67 pp. 783–796, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Kupper, C. Portier, M. Hogan, and E. Yamamoto, “The Impact of Litter Effects on Dose-Response Modeling in Teratology,”Biometrics vol. 42 pp. 85–98, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. M. LaVange, L. L. Keyes, G. G. Koch, and P. A. Margolis, “Application of Sample Survey Methods for Modeling Ratios to Incidence Densities,”Statistics in Medicine vol. 13 pp. 343–355, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Y. Liang and S. L. Zeger, “Longitudinal Data Analysis using Generalized Linear Models,”Biometrika vol. 73 pp. 13–22, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Neuhaus and M. R. Segal, “Design Effects for Binary Regression Models Fitted to Dependent Data,”Statistics in Medicine vol. 12 pp. 1259–1268, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rao and D. Colin, “Fitting Dose-Response Models and Hypothesis Testing in Teratological Studies,” inStatistics in Toxicology (Krewski and Franklin, eds.), Gordon and Breach: New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rao and A. J. Scott, “A Simple Method for the Analysis of Clustered Binary Data,”Biometrics vol. 48 pp. 485–497, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Särndal, B. Swensson, and J. Wretman,Model-Assisted Survey Sampling, Springer-Verlag: New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS,SAS Language: Reference, Version 6, First Edition, SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Serfling,Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics, Wiley: New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. J. Scott and D. Holt, “The Effect of Two-Stage Sampling on Ordinary Least Squares Methods,”Journal of the American Statistical Association vol. 77 pp. 485–497, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. R. Thomas and J. N. K. Rao, “Small-Sample Comparisons of Level and Power for Simple Goodness-of-Fit Statistics under Cluster Sampling,”Journal of the American Statistical Association vol. 82 pp. 630–636, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. M. Wolter,Introduction to Variance Estimation, Springer-Verlag: New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Woodruff, “A Simple Method for Approximating the Variance of a Complicated Estimate,”Journal of the American Statistical Association vol. 66 pp. 411–414, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, R.L. Product-limit survival functions with correlated survival times. Lifetime Data Anal 1, 171–186 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985768

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985768

Keywords

Navigation