Skip to main content
Log in

Phylogenetics of the slipper orchids (Cypripedioideae, Orchidaceae): Nuclear rDNA ITS sequences

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cypripedioideae (Orchidaceae) have been the subject of numerous taxonomic treatments with conflicting interpretations of relationships among the five genera and the 150–170 species. We have produced nuclear ribosomal ITS nucleotide sequences for nearly 100 slipper orchid species and used parsimony analysis to investigate their relationships. Our results demonstrate that each genus, as currently circumscribed, is monophyletic (Mexipedium andSelenipedium being represented by a single taxon). LikerbcL data, ITS sequences placeMexipedium sister toPhragmipedium. Relationships at the sectional level inPaphiopedilum are largely as described byCribb. However, the division ofPaphiopedilum into subgg.Brachypetalum andPaphiopedilum is not supported; subg.Brachypetalum is paraphyletic to subg.Paphiopedilum. Phragmipedium species are divided into the same three major clades as in the taxonomic scheme ofMcCook. The plicate-leaved genera,Cypripedium andSelenipedium, are successive sister groups to the rest of the subfamily, confirming generally held opinions that they display plesiomorphic characters compared to the conduplicate-leaved genera. A survey of karyotypes in the context of the ITS tree reveals a general trend toward increased chromosome number, probably brought about by centric fission. These data also accord with a previously suggested biogeographic hypothesis of a widespread Northern Hemisphere distribution, followed by range fragmentation due to Miocene cooling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, V. A., 1994: Cladistic relationships of the slipper orchids (Cypripedioideae:Orchidaceae) from congruent morphological and molecular data. — Lindleyana9: 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992:Mexipedium: a new genus of slipper orchid (Cypripedioideae:Orchidaceae). — Lindleyana7: 172–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1994: Expansion of genusPaphiopedilum to include all conduplicate-leaved slipper orchids (Cypripedioideae:Orchidaceae). — Lindleyana9: 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, J. T. Jr., 1984: The relationships of the slipper orchids (subfamilyCypripedioideae, Orchidaceae). — Selbyana7: 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, B. G., 1992: Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from theCompositae. — Molec. Phylogenet. Evol.1: 3–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, G., Hooker, J. D., 1883: Genera plantarum3(2): 634–635. — London: Reeve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braem, G. J., 1988:Paphiopedilum: Eine Monographie aller Frauenschuh-Orchideen der asiatischen Tropen und Subtropen. — Hildesheim: Schmersow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brieger, F. G., 1971: Unterfamilie:Cypripedioideae. — InSchlechter, R., (Ed.): Die Orchideen, pp. 161–198. — Berlin, Hamburg: Parey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J. M., 1988: Choosing among multiple equally parsimonious cladograms. — Cladistics4: 291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, M. W., Cameron, K. M., Hills, H. G., Jarrell, D., 1994: DNA sequences and phylogenetics of theOrchidaceae and other lilioid monocots. — InPridgeon, A. M., (Ed.): Proceedings of the 14th World Orchid Conference, pp. 61–73. — Edinburgh: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, M. W., Duvall, M. R., Hills, H. G., Conran, J. G., Cox, A. V., Eguiarte, L. E., Hartwell, J., Fay, M. F., Caddick, L. R., Cameron, K. M., Hoot, S., 1995: Molecular phylogenetics ofLilianae. — InRudall, P. J., Cribb, P. J., Cutler, D. F., Humphries, C. J., (Eds): Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution, pp. 217–225. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, M. W., Hills, H. G., 1991: Silica gel: an ideal material for field preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies. — Taxon40: 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. C., Tsi, Z. H., 1984: OnPaphiopedilum malipoense sp. nov. — an intermediate form betweenPaphiopedilum andCypripedium. — Acta Phytotax. Sin.22: 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. V., 1995: The utility of 5S rDNA in phylogenetic reconstructions. — Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: Comparison of plant telomere locations using a PCR-generated synthetic probe. — Ann. Bot.72: 239–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cribb, P. J., 1987: The genusPaphiopedilum. — London: Collingridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R. M. T., Clifford, H. T., Yeo, P. F., 1985: The families of monocotyledons: structure, evolution, and taxonomy. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. J., Doyle, J. L., 1987: A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. — Phytochem. Bull. Bot. Soc. Amer.19: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, R. L., 1993: Phylogeny and classification of the orchid family. — Cambridge: Dioscorides Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: Whence the orchids? — InRudall, P. J., Cribb, P. J., Cutler, D. F., Humphries, C. J., (Eds): Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution, pp. 217–225. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1960: Classification and phylogeny in theOrchidaceae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.47: 25–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J. S., 1969: A successive approximations approach to character weighting. — Syst. Zool.18: 374–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1996: Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbour joining. — Cladistics12: 99–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1985: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. — Evolution39: 783–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W. M., 1971: Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. — Syst. Zool.20: 406–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garay, L. A., 1979: The genusPhragmipedium. — Orchid Digest43 (July–Aug.): 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallier, H., 1897: ÜberPaphiopedilum amabile und die Hochgebirgsflora des Berges K'Lamm in West Borneo nebst einer Übersicht über die GattungPaphiopedilum. — Ann. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg14: 18–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasawa, K., 1979: Karyomorphological studies inPaphiopedilum, Orchidaceae. — Bull. Hiroshima Bot. Gard.2: 1–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980: Karyomorphological studies inPhragmipedium, Orchidaceae. — Bull. Hiroshima Bot. Gard.3: 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1986: Karyomorphological studies on nine taxa ofPaphiopedilum. — Bull. Hiroshima Bot. Gard.8: 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1986: Karyomorphological studies onCypripedium in Japan and Formosa. — Bull. Hiroshima Bot. Gard.31: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —, 1988: Karyomorphological studies on two species ofPaphiopedilum. — Bull. Hiroshima Bot. Gard.10: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1982: A revision of the genusPaphiopedilum (Orchidaceae). — Bull. Hiroshima Bot. Gard.5: 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980: C-banding study on centric fission in the chromosomes ofPaphiopedilum. — Cytologia45: 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —, 1981: A revision of chromosome numbers in some hybrids ofPaphiopedilum. — Bull. Hiroshima Bot. Gard.4: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraenzlin, F., 1897: Orchidacearum et species plantarum. — Berlin: Mayer & Müller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavin, M., Luckow, M., 1993: Origins and relationships of tropical North America in the context of the boreotropical hypothesis. — Amer. J. Bot.80: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, J., 1840: Genera and species of orchidaceous plants. — London: Ridgway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus, C., 1753: Species plantarum. — Stockholm: Salvius.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCook, L., 1989: Systematics ofPhragmipedium (Cypripedioideae:Orchidaceae). — Ph. D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDade, L. A., 1990: Hybrids and phylogenetic systematics. I. Patterns of character expression in hybrids and their implications for cladistic analysis. — Evolution44: 1685–1700.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992: Hybrids and phylogenetic systematics. II. The impact of hybrids on cladistic analysis. — Evolution46: 1329–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, D. R., 1991: The discovery and importance of multiple islands of mostparsimonious trees. — Syst. Zool.40: 315–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, W. P., Maddison, D. R., 1992: MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3.0. — Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfitzer, E. H. H., 1886: Morphologische Studien über die Orchideenblüthe. — Heidelberg: Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1888: Die Orchideen. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien2, pp. 52–96. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1894: Beiträge zur Systematik der Orchideen. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.19: 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1903:Orchidaceae — Pleonandrae. — InEngler, A. (Ed.): Das PflanzenreichIV 50, pp. 1–132. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafinesque, C. S., 1836: Flora Telluriana4: 45–47. — Philadelphia: Pobasco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. G., 1854: Xenia orchidacea1. — Leipzig: Brockhaus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg, L. H., 1990: Homoploid reticulate evolution inHelianthus (Asteraceae); Evidence from ribosomal genes. — Amer. J. Bot.78: 1218–1237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, R. A., 1896: TheCypripedium group. — Orchid Rev.4: 327–334, 363–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosso, S. W., 1966: The vegetative anatomy of theCypripedioideae (Orchidaceae). — J. Linn. Soc. Bot.59: 309–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto, M. A., Salazar, G. A., Hágsater, E., 1990:Phragmipedium xerophyticum, una nueva especie del sureste de México. — Orquídea (México)12: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1971: Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. — London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, W. L., Cheadle, V. I., Thorsch, J., 1993: Apostasiads, systematic anatomy, and the origins ofOrchidaceae. — J. Linn. Soc. Bot.111: 411–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L., 1993: PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1. — Champaign, Illinois: Illinois Natural History Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., Gibson, T. J., 1995: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position, specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. — Nucl. Acids Res.22: 4673–4680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiffney, B. H., 1985a: Perspectives on the origin of the floristic similarity between eastern Asia and eastern North America. — J. Arnold Arbor.66: 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1985b: The Eocene North Atlantic land bridge: its importance in Tertiary and modern phytogeography of the Northern Hemisphere. — J. Arnold Arbor.66: 243–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimber, D. E., 1993: The chromosome evolution for slipper orchids. — InPridgeon, A. M., (Ed.): Proceedings of the 14th World Orchid Conference, pp. 228–232. — Edinburgh: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. A., 1975: Some aspects of plant geography of the northern hemisphere during late Cretaceous and Tertiary. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62: 264–279.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antony V. Cox.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cox, A.V., Pridgeon, A.M., Albert, V.A. et al. Phylogenetics of the slipper orchids (Cypripedioideae, Orchidaceae): Nuclear rDNA ITS sequences. Pl Syst Evol 208, 197–223 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985442

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985442

Key words

Navigation