Skip to main content
Log in

An assessment of suprageneric phylogeny inCyperaceae usingrbcL DNA sequences

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The phylogeny of suprageneric groups inCyperaceae has been examined by cladistic analysis ofrbcL sequence data of 80 species in 40 genera. The results support the family as monophyletic and derived from a juncaceous grade.Oxychloe (Juncaceae) has moderate support as the sister taxon toCyperaceae. Several monophyletic groups correspond to previously recognised tribes, and some similarities are noted between this analysis and previous cladistic analyses of primarily morphological data. Support is also given for the removal ofHellmuthia from tribeHypolytreae, the transfer ofIsolepis nodosa toFicinia, and the inclusion ofOxycaryum andKyllingiella in tribeCypereae. A polytomy comprisingCyperus, Juncellus, Kyllinga andPycreus indicates a broader circumscription ofCyperus. The greatest uncertainty lies with the generic and tribal status of theScirpeae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentham, G., 1883:Cyperaceae. — InBentham, G., Hooker, J. D., (Eds): Genera plantarum,3, pp. 1037–1073. — London.

  • Browning, J., Gordon-Gray, K. D., 1995: Studies inCyperaceae in southern Africa.24: Three species ofScirpoides. — S. African J. Bot.60: 315–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhl, J. J., 1991: Comparative development of some taxonomically critical floral/inflorescence features inCyperaceae. — Austral. J. Bot.39: 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1995: Sedge genera of the world: relationships and a new classification of theCyperaceae. — Austral. Syst. Bot.8: 125–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, M. W., Soltis, D. E., Olmstead, R. G., Morgan, D., Les, D. H., Mishler, B. D., Duvall, M. R., Price, R. A., Hills, H. G., Qiu, Y.-L., Kron, K. A., Rettig, J. H., Conti, E., Palmer, J. D., Manhart, J. R., Sytsma, K. J., Michaels, H. J., Kress, W. J., Karol, K. G., Clark, W. D., Hedrén, M., Gaut, B. S., Jansen, R. K., Kim, K. -J., Wimpee, C. F., Smith, J. F., Furnier, G. R., Strauss, S. H., Xiang, Q. -Y., Plunkett, G. M., Soltis, P. S., Swenson, S. M., Williams, S. E., Gadek, P. A., Quinn, C. J., Eguiarte, L. E., Golenberg, E., Learn Jr., G. H., Graham, S. W., Barrett, S. C. H., Dayanandan, S., Albert, V. A., 1993: Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid generbcL. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 528–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, M. W., Stevenson, D. W., Wilkin, P., Rudall, P. J., 1995: Monocot systematics: a combined analysis. — InRudall, P. J., Cribb, P. J., Cutler, D. F., Humphries, C. J., (Eds): Monocotyledons — systematics and evolution, pp. 685–730. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, C. B., 1908: New genera and species ofCyperaceae. — Bull. Misc. Inf., Kew, Addit. Ser.8: 1–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1988: The evolution and classification of flowering plants. 2nd edn. — New York: New York Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R., Clifford, H. T., Yeo, P. F., 1985: The families of the monocotyledons. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallwitz, M. J., Paine, T. A., Zurcher, E. J., 1993: ‘User's guide to the DELTA system’. — East Melbourne: CSIRO Division of Entomology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley, J., Durbin, M., Golenberg, E. M., Clegg, M. T., Ma, D. P., 1990: Evolutionary analysis of the large subunit of carboxylase (rbcL) nucleotide sequence among the grasses (Gramineae). — Evolution44: 1097–1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. J., Doyle, J. L., 1987: A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. — Phytochem. Bull.19: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvall, M. R., Clegg, M. T., Chase, M. W., Clark, W. D., Kress, W. J., Hills, H. G., Eguiarte, L. E., Smith, J. F., Gaut, B. S., Zimmer, E. A., Learn, G. H., Jr., 1993: Phylogenetic hypotheses for the monocotyledons constructed fromrbcL sequence data. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 607–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J. S., 1969: A successive approximation approach to character weighting. — Syst. Zool.18: 374–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1996: Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. — Cladistics12: 99–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1995: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. — Evolution39: 783–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W. M., 1971: Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specified tree topology. — Syst. Zool.20: 406–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetghebeur, P., 1986: Genera Cyperacearum. — Dr. Sci. Thesis, State University, Ghent.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1989: Studies inCyperaceae 9. Problems in the lectotypification and infrageneric taxonomy ofCyperus L. — Bull. Soc. Roy. Belg.122: 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon-Gray, K. D., 1995:Cyperaceae in Natal. — Strelitzia2: 1–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, R. W., Lye, K. A., 1976: Studies in AfricanCyperaceae 14. The genusHellmuthia Steud. — Bot. Not.129: 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1983: The sedges and rushes of East Africa. — Nairobi: East African Natural History Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holttum, R. E., 1948: The spikelet inCyperaceae. — Bot. Rev.14: 525–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, G. S., Mahon, J. D., Anderson, P. A., Gibbs, M. J., Badger, M. R., Andrews, T. J., Whitfeld, P. R., 1990: Comparison ofrbcL genes for the large subunit of ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase from closely related C3 and C4 plant species. — J. Biol. Chem.265: 808–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jussieu, A. L. de, 1789: Genera plantarum secundum ordines naturalis disposita. — Paris: Herissant & Barrois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, K. A., Juliano, N. D., 1997: The structure and function of RuBisCo and their implications for systematic studies. — Amer. J. Bot.84: 413–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, J. H., 1974:Cyperaceae. — Invan Steenis, C. G. G. J., (Ed.): Flora Malesiana1(7: 435–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyama, T., 1961: Classification of the familyCyperaceae 1. — J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, Sect. 3, Bot.8: 37–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kükenthal, G., 1936:Cyperaceae — Scirpoideae — Cypereae. — InEngler, A., Diels, A., (Eds): Das Pflanzenreich,IV, 20/101. — Berlin: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunth, C. S., 1837: Enumeratio plantarum.2. — Stuttgart, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nees von Esenbeck, C. G., 1835: Übersicht der Cyperaceengattungen. — Linnaea9: 273–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishizawa, Y., Hirai, A., 1987: Nucleotide sequence and expression of the gene for the large subunit of the ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase. — Jap. J. Genet.62: 389–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, R. G., Michaels, H. J., Scott, K. M., Palmer, J. D., 1992: Monophyly of theAsterideae and the identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences ofrbcL. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.79: 249–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, T. R., Dallwitz, M. J., Watson, L., 1993: Delta Primer. A general system for processing taxonomic descriptions. — East Melbourne: CSIRO Division of Entomology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plunkett, G. M., Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Brooks, R. E., 1995: Phylogenetic relationships betweenJuncaceae andCyperaceae based onrbcL sequence data. — Amer. J. Bot.82: 520–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheahan, M. C., Chase, M. W., 1996: A phylogenetic analysis ofZygophyllaceae R. Br. based on morphological, anatomical andrbcL DNA sequence data. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.122: 279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D. A., 1993: Genera ofCyperaceae recognised at Kew. — Cyp. Newsl.12: 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1995: Relationships withinCyperales. — InRudall, P. J., Cribb, P. J., Cutler, D. F., Humphries, C. J., (Eds): Monocotyledons — systematics and evolution, pp. 497–509. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Nickrent, D. L., Johnson, L. A., Hahn, W. J., Hoot, S. B., Sweere, J. A., Kuzoff, R. K., Kron, K. A., Chase, M. W., Swensen, S. M., Zimmer, E. A., Chaw, S.-M., Gillespie, L. J., Kress, W. J., Sytsma, K. J., 1997: Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.84: 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L., 1993: PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1. — Champaign, Illinois: Illinois Natural History Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A. L., 1980: Outline of the classification of flowering plants. — Bot. Rev.46: 225–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veken, P. van der, 1965: Contribution a l' embryographie systématique desCyperaceae — Cyperoideae. — Bull. Jard. Bot. État25: 285–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. L., 1981: A synopsis of the genusScirpus sens. lat. (Cyperaceae) in Australia. — Telopea2: 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muasya, A.M., Simpson, D.A., Chase, M.W. et al. An assessment of suprageneric phylogeny inCyperaceae usingrbcL DNA sequences. Pl Syst Evol 211, 257–271 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985363

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985363

Key words

Navigation