Skip to main content
Log in

Floral ontogeny and anatomy inKoelreuteria with special emphasis on monosymmetry and septal cavities

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The floral ontogeny and anatomy ofKoelreuteria paniculata have been investigated to understand the developmental basis for the occurring monosymmetry and the origin of the septal cavities. Petals arise sequentially and one petal is missing between sepals 3 and 5, or rarely between sepals 2 and 5. The eight stamens arise sequentially before petal initiation is completed. The last formed petal and one stamen arise on a common primordium. Two stamen positions are empty (opposite the petal between the sepals 2 and 5, and the petal between sepal 1 and 3); consequently two antesepalous stamens have become displaced. The derivation of octandry from a diplostemonous ancestry, and reduction of the petal are discussed. The triangular gynoecium has a strong impact in obliquely reorganizing the symmetry of the flower, loss of organs, and shifts of stamens. The so-called septal slits occurring within the style are a deepreaching non-nectariferous extension of the stigma. Alternating locular furrows are present which could play a role as pollen transmitting tissue and in the loculicid dehiscence of the capsule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998) An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 531–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum H. (1950a) Septalspalten im Gynözeum vonKoelreuteria paniculata. Österr. Bot. Z. 97: 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum H. (1950b) Das Narbensekret vonKoelreuteria paniculata. Österr. Bot. Z. 97: 517–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beille C. (1901) Recherches sur le développement floral des Disciflores. Actes Soc. Linn. Bordeaux 56: 235–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner E. J. H. (1976) The seeds of dicotyledons. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist A. (1981) The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daumann E. (1974) Zur Frage nach dem Vorkommen eines Septalnektariums bei Dicotyledonen. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Blütenmorphologie und Bestäubungsökologie vonBuxus L. undCneorum L. Preslia 42: 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson A. (1865) On diplostemonous flowers; with some remarks upon the position of the carpels in the Malvaceae. Trans. Bot. Soc. Edinburgh 8: 86–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichler A. W. (1878) Blüthendiagramme II. W. Engelmann, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress P. K. (1994) Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igersheim A., Endress P. K. (1997) Gynoecium diversity and systematics of the paleoherbs. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 127: 289–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd W. S., Sanders R. W., Donoghue M. J. (1994) Angiosperm family pairs: preliminary phylogenetic analyses. Harvard Pap. Bot. 5: 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüssmann G. (1985) Manual of cultivated broadleaved trees and shrubs vol. 2. English translation 1985. Timber Press, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabberley D. J. (1987) The plant book. 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchior H. (1964) Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Ed. 12, 2. Gebr. Borntraeger, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payer J. B. (1857) Traité d'organogénie comparée de la fleur. Victor Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radlkofer L. (1897) Sapindaceae. In: Engler A., Prantl K. (eds.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien III, 5. W. Engelmann, Berlin, pp. 277–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronse Decraene L. P., Smets E. (1994) Merosity in flowers: definition, origin, and taxonomic significance. Plant Syst. Evol. 191: 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronse Decraene L. P., Smets E. F. (1995) The distribution and systematic relevance of the androecial character oligomery. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 118: 193–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronse Decraene L. P., Clinckemaillie D., Smets E. F. (1993) Stamen-petal complexes in Magnoliatae. Bull. Jard. Bot. Natl. Belg. 62: 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronse Decraene L. P., Vanvinckenroye P., Smets E. F. (1997) A study of floral morphological diversity inPhytolacca (Phytolaccaceae) based on early floral ontogeny. Int. J. Plant Sci. 158: 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronse Decraene L. P., De Laet J., Smets E. F. (1998) Floral development and anatomy ofMoringa oleifera (Moringaceae): what is the evidence for a capparalean or sapindalean affinity? Ann. Bot. 82: 273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid R. (1985) Functional interpretations of the morphology and anatomy of septal nectaries. Acta Bot. Neerl. 34: 125–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets E. F. (1988a) La présence des “nectaria persistentia” chez les Magnoliophytina (angiospermes). Candollea 43: 709–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets E. F. (1988b) Florale nektariën van de Magnoliophytina: karakterizering en systematische betekenis. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets E. F., Cresens E. M. (1988) Types of floral nectaries and the concepts “character” and “character-state” — a reconsideration. Acta Bot. Neerl. 37: 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets E. F., Ronse Decraene L. P., Clinckemaillie D. (1991) Gynoecial development and nectaries inKoelreuteria paniculata (Sapindaceae). 11th Symposium Morphologie, Anatomie und Systematik Göttingen, abstracts: 66.

  • Smets E. F., Ronse Decraene L. P., Caris P., Rudall P. (in press) Floral nectaries in monocotyledons: distribution and evolution. In: Wilson K. L., Morrison D. (eds.) Systematics and evolution of Monocots. Sydney (Australia).

  • Traveset A. (1995) Reproductive ecology ofCneorum tricoccon L. (Cneoraceae) in the Balearic Islands. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 117: 221–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker S. C. (1984) Unidirectional organ initiation in leguminous flowers. Am. J. Bot. 71: 1139–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Pijl (1957) On the arilloids ofNephelium, Euphoria, Litchi andAesculus, and the seeds of Sapindaceae in general. Acta. Bot. Neerl. 6: 618–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Heel W. A. (1988) On the development of some gynoecia with septal nectaries. Blumea 33: 477–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weberling F. (1989) Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijnands D. O. (1991)Koelreuteria. Bull. Bot. Tuin Wageningen 26: 10–11. (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Decraene, L.P.R., Smets, E. & Clinckemaillie, D. Floral ontogeny and anatomy inKoelreuteria with special emphasis on monosymmetry and septal cavities. Pl Syst Evol 223, 91–107 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985329

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985329

Key words

Navigation