Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling unemployment duration in a dependent competing risks framework: Identification and estimation

  • Published:
Lifetime Data Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three Mixed Proportional Hazard models for estimation of unemployment duration when attrition is present are considered. The virtue of these models is that they take account of dependence between failure times in a multivariate failure time distribution context. However, identification in dependent competing risks models is not straightforward. We show that these models, independently derived, are special cases of a general frailty model. It is also demonstrated that the three models are identified by means of identification of the general model. An empirical example illustrates the approach to model dependent failure times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. Han and J. Hausman, “Flexible parametric estimation of duration and competing risk models,”Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 5 pp. 325–353, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. J. Heckman and B. E. Honoré, “The identifiability of the competing risks model,”Biometrika, vol. 76:2 pp. 325–330, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. J. Heckman and B. L. Singer, “A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data,”Econometrica, vol. 52 pp. 271–320, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Hougaard, “Survival models for heterogeneous populations derived from stable distributions,”Biometrika, vol. 73:2 pp. 387–396, 1986a.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Hougaard, “A class of multivariate failure time distributions,”Biometrika, vol. 73:3 pp. 671–678, 1986b.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Hougaard, “Modelling Multivariate Survival,”Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, vol. 14 pp. 291–304, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. M. Kiefer, “Economic duration data and hazard functions,”Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 26 pp. 646–679, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Lancaster, “Econometric methods for the duration of unemployment,”Econometrica, vol. 47 pp. 936–956, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Lancaster,The econometric analysis of transition data Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Lindeboom and G. Van Den Berg, “Heterogeneity in Models for Bivariates: the Importance of the Mixing Distribution,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol. 56 pp. 49–60, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Meyer, “Unemployment insurance and unemployment spells,”Econometrica, vol. 58 pp. 757–782, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Narendranathan and M. B. Stewart, “Modelling the Probability of Leaving Unemployment: Competing Risks Models with Flexible Baseline Hazards,”Applied Statistics, vol. 42 pp. 63–83, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. J. Van Den Berg, M. Lindeboom, and G. Ridder, “Attrition in Longitudinal Panel Data, and the Empirical Analysis of Dynamic Labour Market Behaviour,”Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1994, in press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carling, K., Jacobson, T. Modeling unemployment duration in a dependent competing risks framework: Identification and estimation. Lifetime Data Anal 1, 111–122 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985262

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985262

Key words

Navigation