Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Phylogeny inLabiatae s. l., inferred from cpDNA sequences

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sequences ofrbcL andndhF were analysed independently and in combination to resolve phylogenetic relationships inLabiatae s. l. Monophyly ofLabiatae s. l was supported by all three analyses.Congea tomentosa (Symphoremataceae) is nested withinLabiatae s. l. in therbcL analysis, but emerges as the sister group ofLabiatae s. l. in thendhF and combined analyses. Four noteworthy clades ofLabiate s. l. also are supported by all analyses corresponding to subfamiliesNepetoideae, Lamioideae, Pogostemonoideae andScutellarioideae. Monophyly of subfamiliesChloanthoideae andViticoideae is not supported. A clade comprisingTeucrioideae plusAjuga is supported byndhF and the combined analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentham, G., 1876:Verbenaceae andLabiatae. — InBentham, G., Hooker, J. D., (Eds): Genera plantarum,2, pp. 1131–1223. — London: Reeve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briquet, J., 1895:Verbenaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien,4/3a, pp. 132–182. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1895–1897:Labiatae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien,4/3a, pp. 183–375. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantino, P. D., Sanders, R. W., 1986: Subfamilial classification ofLabiatae. — Syst. Bot.11: 163–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992a: Evidence for a polyphyletic origin of theLabiatae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.79: 361–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992b: Toward a phylogenetic classification of theLabiatae. — InHarley, R. M., Reynolds, T., (Eds): Advances in Labiate science, pp. 27–37. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992: Genera ofLabiatae: status and classification. — InHarley, R. M., Reynolds, T., (Eds): Advances in Labiate science, pp. 511–522. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Olmstead, R. G., Wagstaff, S. J., 1997: A comparison of phylogenetic nomenclature with the current system: a botanical case study. — Syst. Biol. (in press).

  • Cronquist, A., 1981: An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Queiroz, A., Donoghue, M. J., Junhyong, K., 1995: Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.26: 657–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1985: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. — Evolution39: 783–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junell, S., 1934: Zur Gynäceummorphologie und Systematik der Verbenaceen und Labiaten. — Symb. Bot. Upsal.4: 1–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huelsenbeck, J. P., Bull, J. J., Cunningham, C. W., 1996: Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. — Trends Ecol. Evol.11: 152–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, M., Wink, M., 1995: Molecular systematics of theNepetoideae (familyLabiatae): phylogenetic implications fromrbcL gene sequences. — Z. Naturf., C49: 635–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, D. R., 1991: The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. — Syst. Zool.40: 315–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, W. P., Maddison, D. R., 1992: MacClade vers. 3.1: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. — Sunderland, Massachussetts: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto, M. M., Fitch, W. M., 1995: Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. — Syst. Biol.44: 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, R. G., Michaels, H. S., Scott, K. M., Palmer, J. D., 1992: Monophyly of theAsteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences ofrbcL. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Grad.79: 249–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: A parsimony analysis of theAsteridae sensu lato based onrbcL sequences. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 700–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1994: Chloroplast DNA systematics: a review of methods and data analysis. — Amer. J. Bot.81: 1205–1224.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: Polyphyletic origin of theScrophulariaceae: evidence fromrbcL andndhF sequences. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.82: 176–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryding, O., 1995: Pericarp structure and phylogeny of theLamiaceae-Verbenaceae complex. — Pl. Syst. Evol.198: 101–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steane, D. A., Scotland, R. W., Mabberley, D. J., Wagstaff, S. J., Reeves, P. A., Olmstead, R. G., 1997: Phylogenetic relationships ofClerodendrum s. l. (Lamiaceae) inferred from chloroplast DNA. — Syst. Bot. (in press).

  • Swofford, D. L., 1993: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (PAUP vers. 3.1.1). — Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R. F., 1992: Classification and geography of the flowering plants. — Bot. Rev.58: 225–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdés III, L. J., Hatfield, G. M., Koreeda, M., Paul, A. G., 1987a: Studies ofSalvia divinorum (Lamiaceae), an hallucinogenic mint from the Sierra Mazateca in Oaxaca, Central Mexico. — Econ. Bot.41: 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1987b:Coleus barbatus (C. forskohlii) (Lamiaceae) and the potential new drug forskolin (coleonol). — Econ. Bot.41: 474–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, S. J., Olmstead, R. G., 1997: Phylogeny ofLabiatae andVerbenaceae inferred fromrbcL sequences. — Syst. Bot. (in press).

  • —, 1995: A phylogenetic analysis of restriction site variation in subfamilyNepetoideae (Labiatae). — Amer. J. Bot.82: 886–892.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Steven J. Wagstaff

    Present address: Manaaki Whenua, Landcare Research, P.O. Box 69, 8152, Lincoln, New Zealand

  2. Laura Hickerson

    Present address: Department of Biology, Utah State University, 84322, Logan, UT, USA

  3. Russ Spangler

    Present address: Harvard University Herbaria, 22 Divinity Ave, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA

  4. Patrick A. Reeves

    Present address: Department of Botany, University of Washington, Box 355325, 95195-5325, Seattle, WA, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental, Population and Organismic Biology, University of Colorado, 80309, Boulder, Colorado, USA

    Steven J. Wagstaff, Laura Hickerson, Russ Spangler, Patrick A. Reeves & Richard G. Olmstead

Authors
  1. Steven J. Wagstaff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura Hickerson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Russ Spangler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Patrick A. Reeves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Richard G. Olmstead
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagstaff, S.J., Hickerson, L., Spangler, R. et al. Phylogeny inLabiatae s. l., inferred from cpDNA sequences. Pl Syst Evol 209, 265–274 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985232

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985232

Key words

Search

Navigation