Skip to main content
Log in

Ant pollination of the palaeoendemic dioeciousBorderea pyrenaica (Dioscoreaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of ants for pollination in the dioeciousBorderea pyrenaica (Dioscoreaceae), a Tertiary palaeoendemic plant of the Pyrenees (NE Iberian Peninsula) was studied. The frequency of different visitors (ants, lady beetles, andDiptera) to staminate and pistillate flowers was quantified, and their effectiveness as pollinators was examined by means of fruit and seed set in selective experimental exclusions. Although ants were less abundant on flowers than other visitors, they were the most effective pollinators. Some qualitative factors of this mutualistic ant-plant interaction may account for their effectiveness: the small size of the ants, their high visitation rate to pistillate flowers, and the lack of reduction in viability of the pollen transported on the integument. In addition, the sedentary nature of ants assures their presence during the flowering period. The most abundant floral visitors ofB. pyrenaica were therefore not the most effective pollinators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ågren, J., Elmquist, T., Tunlid, A., 1986: Pollination by deceit, floral sex ratios and seed set in dioeciousRubus chamaemorus L. — Oecologia70: 332–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. E., Irvine, A. K., 1989: Floral biology ofMyristica insipida (Myristicaceae), a distinctive beetle pollination syndrome. — Amer. J. Bot.76: 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R. M., 1982: Pollination, predation and seed set inLinaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae). — Amer. Midl. Naturalist107: 360–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo, M. T. K., Primack, R., Armesto, J., 1982: Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of central Chile I. Pollination mechanisms and altitudinal variation. — Amer. J. Bot.69: 82–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H. G., 1976: “Mistake” pollination as a reproductive system with special reference to theCaricaceae. — InBurley, J., Styles, B. T., (Eds): Tropical trees. Variation, breeding and conservation, pp. 161–169. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, K. S., 1980a: Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst11: 15–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980b: Mimicry of male by female flowers and intra-sexual competetion for pollinators inJacaratia dolichaula (D. Smith)Woodson (Caricaceae). — Evolution34: 467–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1975: Dioecism in tropical forest trees. — Evolution29: 167–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, A. J., 1985: The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Ant inhibition of pollen function: a possible reason why ant pollination is rare. — Amer. J. Bot.71: 421–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Jobson, S., Knox, B., 1985: The vulnerability of pollen and fungal spores to ant secretions: evidence and some evolutionary implications. — Amer. J. Bot.72: 606–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1986: Antibiotic production: a possible function for the metapleural glands of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). — Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer.79: 448–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, D., 1993: Why are unisexual flowers associated with wind pollination and unspecialized pollinators? — Amer. Naturalist141: 481–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faegri, K., van der Pijl, L., 1979: The principles of pollination ecology. — Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. F., 1985: Incidence of dioecy in relation to growth form, pollination and dispersal. — Oecologia67: 244–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., Harper, K. T., Ostler, W. K., 1980: Ecology of plant dioecy in the intermountain region of western North America and California. — Oecologia44: 410–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, M. B., 1993: Biología reproductiva y ecología de plantas endémicas relictas de los Pirineos. — Doctoral Thesis, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: Sex ratio and sexual dimorphism in the dioeciousBorderea pyrenaica (Dioscoreaceae). — Oecologia101: 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, J. M., Zazora, R., 1992: Pollination by ants: consequences of the quantitative effects on a mutualistic system. — Oecologia91: 410–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, K. S., 1962: Biology and ecology of predaceousCoccinellidae. — Annu. Rev. Entomol.7: 289–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, C. M., 1987: Components of pollinator “quality”: comparative analysis of a diverse assemblage. — Oikos50: 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1989: Pollinator abundance, morphology, and flower visitation rate: analysis of the “quantity” component in a plant-pollinator system. — Oecologia80: 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Nectar thievery by ants from southern Spanish insect-pollinated flowers. — Insectes Sociaux31: 142–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, J., Heslop-Harrison, Y., 1970: Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence; intracellular hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate. — Stain Technol.45: 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Shivanna, K. R., 1984: The evaluation of pollen quality, and a further appraisal of the fluorochromatic (FCR) test procedure. — Theor. Appl. Genet.67: 367–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, J. C., 1974: Pollination by ants: a low-energy system. — Science184: 1290–1292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. A., Beattie, A. J., 1988: Adverse effects on pollen exposed toAtta texana and other North American ants: implications for ant pollination. — Oecologia75: 153–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwanami, Y., Iwadare, T., 1978: Inhibiting effects of myrmicacin on pollen growth and pollen tube mitosis. — Bot. Gaz.139: 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreitzer, S., Iperti, G., 1984: Importance des sommets de moyenne altitude dans la survie d'une coccinelle aphidipahage. — Acta Biol. Mont.4: 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J., 1983: A review of floral food deception mimicries with comments on floral mutualism. — InJones, C. E., Little, R. J., (Eds): Handbook of experimental pollination biology, pp. 294–309. — New York: Scientific and Academic Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motten, A. F., 1986: Pollination ecology of the spring wildflower community of a temperate deciduous forest. — Ecol. Monogr.56: 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muenchow, G. T., 1987: Is dioecy associated with fleshy fruit? — Amer. J. Bot.74: 287–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peakall, R., 1989: The unique pollination ofLeporella fimbriata (Orchidaceae): pollination by pseudocopulating male ants (Myrmecia urens, Formicidae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.167: 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1989: Pollination of the orchidMicrotis parviflora R. Br. by flightless worker ants. — Functional Ecology3: 515–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,James, S. H., 1987: Pseudocopulation of an orchid by male ants: a test of two hypotheses accounting for the rarity of ant pollination. — Oecologia73: 522–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1990: The significance of ant and plant traits for ant pollination inLeporella fimbriata. — Oecologia84: 457–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991: The evidence for, and importantce of, ant pollination. — InHuxley, C. R., Cutter, D. F., (Eds): Ant-plant interactions, pp. 421–429. — Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, B., 1977a: Pollination by ants in the alpine tundra of Colorado. — Trans. Ill. State Acad. Sci.70: 349–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1977b: Pollination ofThlaspi alpestre by selfing and by insects in the alpine zone of Colorado. — Arctic Alp. Res.9: 211–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack, R. B., Silander, J. A., 1975: Measuring the relative importance of different pollinators to plants. — Nature255: 143–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, M., Yeo, P., 1973: The pollination of flowers. — London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renner, S. S., Feil, J. P., 1993: Pollinators of tropical dioecious angiosperms. — Amer. J. Bot.80: 1100–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske, D. W., Horvitz, C. C., 1984: Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization. — Science225: 519–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1989: Temporal variation in selection on a floral character. — Evolution43: 461–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veal, D. A., Trimble, J. E., Beattie, A. J., 1992: Antimicrobial properties of secretions from the metapleural glands ofMyrmecia gulosa (the Australian bull ant). — J. Appl. Bact.72: 188–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. D., Harper, K. T., Booth, G. M., 1988: Elevational distribution of insect pollinators. — Amer. Midl. Naturalist120: 325–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson, M. F., Ågren, J., 1989: Differential floral rewards and pollination by deceit in unisexual flowers. — Oikos55: 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H., 1984: Biostatistical analysis. — New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García, M.B., Antor, R.J. & Espadaler, X. Ant pollination of the palaeoendemic dioeciousBorderea pyrenaica (Dioscoreaceae) . Pl Syst Evol 198, 17–27 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985105

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985105

Key words

Navigation