Skip to main content
Log in

Comparatives, superlatives, and resolution

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Barwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’,Linguistics and Philosophy 4(2), 159–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J.: 1973, ‘Syntax of the Comparative Clause Construction in English’,Linguistic Inquiry 4(2), 275–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.: 1975,Montague's Semantic Theory and Transformational Syntax, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Cresswell, M. J.: 1976, ‘The Semantics of Degree’, in B. Partee (ed.),Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, M., S. Shieber, and F. Pereira: 1991, ‘Ellipsis and Higher-Order Unification’,Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 399–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawron, Jean Mark: 1992, ‘Focus and Ellipsis in Comparatives and Superlatives: A Case Study’, in C. Barker and D. Dowty (eds.),SALT II: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics.

  • Geach, P.: 1962,Reference and Generality, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward L. and L. Moss: 1984, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and the Expressive Power of Natural Language’, in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.),Generalized Quantifiers, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M.: 1987, Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution: Towards a Semantics of Quantity. Technical Report 17, Forschungsstelle für natursprachliche Systeme, Universität Tubingen.

  • Link, G.: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach’, in R. Bäuerle, U. Egli, and A. von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1974,Formal Philosophy, R. H. Thomason (ed.), Yale, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerbonne, J.: 1991, ‘Nominal Comparatives and Generalized Quantifiers’, manuscript, DFKI, Saarbrucken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulman, S.: 1991, ‘Comparatives and Ellipsis’,Proceedings of European ACL.

  • Pulman, S.: 1992, ‘Higher Order Unification and the Semantics of Focus’, manuscript, SRI International, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, M. and A. Banks: 1990, ‘An Implementable Semantics for Comparative Constructions’,Computational Linguistics 16, 86–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, M.: 1985, ‘Association with Focus’, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Rooth, M.: 1992, ‘A Theory of Focus Interpretation,’Natural Language Semantics 1(1), 75–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. R.: 1967,Constraints on Variables in Syntax, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT.

  • Sag, I.: 1976,Deletion and Logical Form, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Szabolsci, A.: 1986, ‘Comparative Superlatives’, in N. Fukui, T. Rappoport and E. Sagey (eds.),MIT Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, Vol. 8, MIT, Department of Linguistics.

  • Taglicht, J.: 1984,Message and Emphasis, Longman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gawron, J.M. Comparatives, superlatives, and resolution. Linguist Philos 18, 333–380 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984929

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984929

Keywords

Navigation