Skip to main content
Log in

Spiniferomonas septispina andS. enigmata, two new algal species confusing the distinction betweenSpiniferomonas andChrysosphaerella (Chrysophyceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two new species of non-colonial silica-scaled chrysophytes were discovered in Ontario and were assigned to the genusSpiniferomonas (Chrysophyceae) owing to their solitary cell habit. Scale structure in the two new species is distinctive but includes features common to bothSpiniferomonas andChrysosphaerella. The use of scale structure as the main diagnostic feature to distinguish the two genera is no longer acceptable. A more expedient separation of the two genera based on cell habit (solitary vs. colonial) is proposed and includes the transfer ofChrysospharella salina Birch-Andersen andChrysosphaerella coronacircumspina Wujek & Kristiansen to the genusSpiniferomonas as new combinations. The proposed revision is consistent with existing generic circumscriptions of other ochromonadalean forms with either solitary or colonial cell habit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asmund, B., Kristiansen, J., 1984: The genusMallomonas (Chrysophyceae). — Opera Marina (in press).

  • Balanov, I. M., 1980: On the new species of the genusChrysosphaerella (Chrysophyta). — Bot. Z. H.65, 1190–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch-Andersen, P., 1973:Chrysosphaerella salina. A new species of theChrysophyceae from salt marsh pools. — Bot. Tidsskr.68, 140–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billard, C., 1983:Prymnesium zebrinum sp. nov. etP. annuliferum sp. nov., deux nouvelles espèces apparentées àP. parvum Carter (Prymnesiophyceae). — Phycologia22, 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronberg, G., Kristiansen, J., 1980:Synuraceae and otherChrysophyceae from central Småland, Sweden. — Bot. Not.133, 595–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. C., Hibberd, D. J., Pienaar, R. N., 1982: The taxonomy ofPrymnesium (Prymnesiophyceae) including a description of a new cosmopolitan species,P. patellifera sp. nov., and further observations onP. parvum N. Carter. — Br. Phycol. J.17, 363–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, J., 1978: Studies on theChrysophyceae of Bornholm. II. — Bot. Tidsskr.73, 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980:Chrysophyceae from some Greek lakes. — Nova Hedwigia33, 167–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton, I., Oates, K., 1980:Polycrater galapagensis gen. et sp. nov., a putative coccolithophorid from the Galapagos Islands with an unusual aragonitic periplast. — Br. Phycol. J.15, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981: Cylinder-scales in marine flagellates from the genusChrysochromulina (Haptophyceae = Prymnesiophyceae): Further observations fromC. microcylindra Leadbeater andC. cyathophora Thomsen. — J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K.61, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moestrup, O., 1979: Identification by electron microscopy of marine nanoplankton from New Zealand including the description of four new species. — New Zeal. J. Bot.17, 61–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, K. H., 1980: A reassessment ofChrysosphaerella longispina andC. multispina, and a revised key to related genera in theSynuraceae (Chrysophyceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.135, 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981:Spiniferomonas (Chrysophyceae) in Ontario lakes including a revision and descriptions of two new species. — Can. J. Bot.59, 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1984: The validity of the genusSpiniferomonas Takahashi (Chrysophyceae). — Nord. J. Bot. (accepted).

  • Preisig, H. R., Takahashi, E., 1978:Chrysosphaerella (Pseudochrysosphaerella)solitaria, spec. nova (Chrysophyceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.129, 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1982a: Ultrastructure and taxonomy ofParaphysomonas (Chrysophyceae) and related genera 1. — Nord. J. Bot.2, 397–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1982b: Ultrastructure and taxonomy ofParaphysomonas (Chrysophyceae) and related genera 2. — Nord. J. Bot.2, 601–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogstad, A., 1982:Synuraceae-Floraen I 27 Lokaliteter I Oslo-Omradet, En Lysmikroskopisk Og Elektronmikroskopisk Undersokelse. — Univ. Oslo: Inst. Mar. Biol. Limnol., 128 pp., English Summary.

  • Takahashi, E., 1973: Studies on generaMallomonas andSynura, and other plankton in freshwater with the electron microscope VII. New genusSpiniferomonas of theSynuraceae (Chrysophyceae). — Bot. Mag. Tokyo86, 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978: Electron microscopical studies of theSynuraceae (Chrysophyceae) in Japan; taxonomy and ecology. — Tokyo: Tokai University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, H. A., 1979: Electron microscopical observations on brackish-water nannoplankton from the Tvärminne area, SW coast of Finland. — Acta Bot. Fennica110, 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980a:Quaternariella obscura gen. et sp. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae) from West Greenland. — Phycologia19, 260–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980b: Two species ofTrigonaspis gen. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae) from West Greenland. — Phycologia19, 218–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wujek, D. E., Hamilton, R., Wee, J., 1975: Studies on MichiganChrysophyceae. III. — Mich. Bot.14, 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1977: Studies on MichiganChrysophyceae. IV. — Mich. Bot.16, 191–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1983:Chrysodidymus in the United States. — Trans. Amer. Microsc. Soc.102, 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicholls, K.H. Spiniferomonas septispina andS. enigmata, two new algal species confusing the distinction betweenSpiniferomonas andChrysosphaerella (Chrysophyceae). Pl Syst Evol 148, 103–117 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984572

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984572

Key words

Navigation