Skip to main content
Log in

Cytotaxonomy and breeding system of the genusBiscutella (Cruciferae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chromosome counts were determined for 46 populations ofBiscutella representing 28 taxa. The genus was found to contain diploid taxa with 2n = 12, 16 and 18, tetraploid taxa with 2n = 36 and hexaploid taxa having 2n = 54.B. laevigata L. s. l. consists of diploid and tetraploid populations which are poorly differentiated morphologically. TetraploidB. laevigata s. l. and hexaploidB. variegata Boiss. & Reuter (s. l.) are characterized by chromosomal instability. The variation in chromosome numbers and the occurrence of polyploidy is discussed in relation to the taxonomy of the genus. An investigation of the breeding system showed that most of the annual species were self-compatible and partly inbreeding and most of the perennial species self-incompatible and, therefore, outbreeding, while one annual species,B. cichoriifolia Loisel., showed both systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, H. G., 1959: Reproductive methods as factors in speciation in flowering plants. — Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.24, 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J., 1955a: Self-incompatibility systems in Angiosperms III.Cruciferae. — Heredity9, 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1955b: Note on Dioecy in theCruciferae. — Heredity9, 415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beddows, A. R., 1931: Seed-setting and flowering in various grasses. — Welsh Plant Breeding Station Bull.12, Ser. H.

  • Bresinsky, A., Grau, J., 1970: Zur Chorologie and Systematik vonBiscutella im Bayerischen Alpenvorland. — Ber. Bayer. Bot. Ges.42, 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castroviejo, S., 1982: Números cromosomáticos de plantas occidentales, 157–163. — Anal. Jard. Bot. Madrid38 (2), 507–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delay, J., 1971: Orophytes. — Inf. Ann. Caryosyst. Cytogenet. Strasbourg et Lille5, 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wet, J. M. J., 1968: Diploid-tetraploid-haploid cycles and the origin of variability inDichanthium agamospecies. — Evolution22, 394–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolcher, T., Pignatti, S., 1960: Note Cariologiche su Plante Mediterranee (Biscutella, Convolvulus, Reichardia). — Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital.67, n. s., 176–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garde, A., Malheiros-Garde, N., 1953: Contribuição para o estudo cariológico de algumas especies de angiospermicas.I. — Genetica Iberica5 (3–4), 115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinea, E., Heywood, V. H., 1964:Biscutella. — InTutin, T. G., & al. (Eds.): Flora Europaea1, 325–330. — Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, H. E., Landolt, E., Hirzel, R., (Eds.), 1970: Flora der Schweiz2, 152. — Zürich: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, V. H., 1960: The taxonomy of polypoids in Flora Europaea. — Feddes Repert.63, 179–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1964:Biscutella: Taxonomic and Nomenclatural Notes. — Feddes Repert.69, 142–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. C., 1962: Interspecific hybridization inHaplopappus and its bearing on chromosome evolution in theBlepharodon section. — Amer. J. Bot.49, 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaretzky, R., 1928: Untersuchungen über Cromosomen und Phylogenie bei einigenCruciferae. — Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.68, 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K., 1970: Chromosome changes in plant evolution. — Taxon19, 172–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, D. D., 1957: Trends in systematic botany. — Survey of Biological Progress3, 47–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khyos, D. W., 1965: The independent aneuploid origin of two species ofChaenactis (Compositae) from a common ancestor. — Evolution19, 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, O., 1905: Über die Wirkung der Selbstbestäubung bei den Papilionaceen. — Naturw. Z. Land- Forstwirtschaft3, 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küpfer, P., 1968: Nouvelles prospections caryologiques dans la flore orophile des Pyrénées et de la Sierra Nevada. — Bull. Soc. Neuchât. Sc. Nat.91, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, K., Laegaard, S., 1971: Chromosome studies of the Sicilian flora. — Bot. Tidsskr.66, 249–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawalrée, A., 1955: Flore Générale Belgique Spermatophytes2 (1), 246–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve, A., 1960: Taxonomy and Chromosomes—a Reiteration. — Feddes Repert.63, 192–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve, A., Löve, D., 1974: Nomenclatural Adjustments in the Yugoslavian Flora II. Pteridophytes and Dicotyledons. — Preslia46 (2), 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machatschki-Laurich, B., 1926: Die Arten der GattungBiscutella L. sect.Thlaspidium (Med.) DC. — Bot. Arch.13, 1–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, E., 1910: Monographie du genreBiscutella L. I. Classification et distribution géographique. — Bull. Acad. Sci. Cracovie1910, Series B, 111–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton, I., 1932: Introduction to the general cytology of theCruciferae. — Ann. Bot.46, 509–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1934: The problem ofBiscutella laevigata L. — Z. Indukt. Abstamm. Vererb.67, 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1937: The problem ofBiscutella laevigata L. II. The evidence from meiosis. — Ann. Bot.1, n. s., 439–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markgraf, F., 1963:Biscutella. — InHegi, G., (Fund.): Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa. Ed. 2.4 (1), 388–394.

  • Meusel, H., Jäger, E., Weinert, E., 1965: Vergleichende Chorologie der Zentraleuropäischen Flora1. — Jena: G. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockendon, D. J., 1972: Pollen tube growth and the site of the incompatibility reaction inBrassica oleracea. — New Phytol.71, 519–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olowokudejo, J. D., 1980: Systematic Studies in the GenusBiscutella L. — Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Reading.

  • Ornduff, R., 1966: A biosystematic survey of the Goldfield genusLasthenia. — Univ. California Public. Bot.40, 1–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pignatti, S., 1982: Flora d'Italia1, 455–459. — Bologna: Edagricole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. H., Thompson, H. J., 1964: Haploidy and angiosperm evolution. — Amer. Nat.98, 251–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, R. C., 1963a: The evolution and systematics ofLeavenworthia (Cruciferae). — Contr. Gray Herb.192, 1–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1963b: Protandry in two species ofStrepthanthus (Cruciferae). — Rhodora65, 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, D. R., 1964: A one-locus self-incompatibility system inRaphanus raphanistrum. — Can. J. Genet. Cytol.6, 435–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönfelder, P., 1968: Chromosomenzahlen einiger Arten der GattungBiscutella L. — Österr. Bot. Z.115, 363–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., Jr., 1958: The inviability, weakness and sterility of interspecific hybrids. — Advances in Genetics9, 147–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, K. F., 1957: Self-incompatibility in Marrow-stem Kale,Brassica oleraceae var.acephala. I. Demonstration of a sporophytic system. — J. Genet.55, 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobgy, H. A., 1943: A cytological study ofCrepis fuliginosa andC. neglecta and their F1 hybrid and its bearing on the mechanism of phylogenetic reduction in chromosome number. — J. Genet.45, 67–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olowokudejo, J.D., Heywood, V.H. Cytotaxonomy and breeding system of the genusBiscutella (Cruciferae). Pl Syst Evol 145, 291–309 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983955

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983955

Key words

Navigation