Skip to main content
Log in

Floral volatiles fromClarkia breweri andC. concinna (Onagraceae): Recent evolution of floral scent and moth pollination

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clarkia breweri (Onagraceae) is the only species known in its genus to produce strong floral fragrance and to be pollinated by moths. We used gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to identify 12 abundant compounds in the floral headspace from two inbred lines ofC. breweri. These volatiles are derived from two biochemical pathways, one producing acyclic monoterpenes and their oxides, the other leading from phenylalanine to benzoate and its derivatives. Linalool and linalool oxide (pyran form) were the most abundant monoterpenoids, while linalool oxide (furan form) was present at lower concentrations. Of the aromatic compounds detected, benzyl acetate was most abundant, whereas benzyl benzoate, eugenol, methyl salicylate, and vanillin were present as minor constituents in all floral samples. The two inbredC. breweri lines differed for the presence of the additional benzenoid compounds isoeugenol, methyleugenol, methylisoeugenol, and veratraldehyde. We also analyzed floral headspace fromC. concinna, the likely progenitor ofC. breweri, whose flowers are odorless to the human nose. Ten volatiles (mostly terpenoids) were detected at low concentrations, but only when headspace was collected from 20 or more flowers at a time. Trans-β-ocimene was the most abundant floral compound identified from this species. Our data are consistent with the hypothesized recent evolution of floral scent production and moth pollination inC. breweri.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, H., 1961: The adaptation of flowering plants to nocturnal and crepuscular pollinators. — Quart. Rev. Biol.36: 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantjes, N., 1973: Sphingophilous flowers, function of their scent. — InBrantjes, N., (Ed.): Pollination and dispersal, pp. 27–46. — Nijmwegen: Dept. Botany.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978: Sensory responses to flowers in night-flying moths. — InRichards, A. J., (Ed.): The pollination of flowers by insects, pp. 13–19. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantelo, W., Jacobson, M., 1979a: Phenylacetaldehyde attracts moths to bladder flower and to blacklight traps. — Env. Ent.8: 444–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —, 1979b: Corn silk volatiles attract many pest species of moths. — J. Environ. Sci. Health,A14 (8): 695–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cori, O., Chayet, L., Perez, L., Bunton, C., Hachey, D., 1986: Rearrangement of linalool, geraniol and nerol and their derivatives. — J. Org. Chem.51: 1310–1316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, C., Dressler, R., Hills, H., Adams, R., Williams, N., 1969: Biologically active compounds in orchid fragrances. — Science164: 1243–1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., 1982: The jacknife, bootstrap and other resampling plants. — Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, B., Thiery, D., Suchy, V., Marion-Poll, F., Hradsky, P., Farkas, P., 1992: Floral volatiles ofTanacetum vulgare attractive toLobesia botrana females. — J. Chem. Ecol.18: 693–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen, C., Kevan, P., 1983: Bumblebee foraging and floral scent dimorphism:Bombus kirbyellus andPolemonium viscosum. — Canad. J. Zool.61: 1207–1213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L. D., Weeden, N. F., 1979: Gene duplication and phylogeny inClarkia. — Evolution33: 1024–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., 1983: The systematic and geographical distribution of hawkmoth flowers in the temperate North American flora. — Bot. Gaz.144: 439–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, K., 1983: Variation in floral fragrances and morphology: incipient speciation inCycnoches? — Bot. Gaz.144: 566–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, D., 1963: Hawkmoth pollination in the genusOenothera. — Aliso5: 357–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1964: Hawkmoth pollination in the genusOenothera. — Aliso5: 385–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, I., Bergstrom, G., Pellmyr, O., 1987: Floral fragrances inCimicifuga: chemical polymorphism and incipient speciation inCimicifuga simplex. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.15: 441–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, R., Landolt, P., Dueben, B., Lenczewski, B., 1992: Identification of floral compounds of night-blooming jessamine attractive to cabbage looper moths. — Env. Ent.21: 854–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, J., Teuber, L., 1992: Combined gas chromatography-electroantennogram characterization of alfalfa floral volatiles recognized by honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). — J. Econ. Ent.85: 226–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, H. G., Williams, N. W., Dodson, C. H., 1972: Floral fragrances and isolating mechanisms in the genusCatasetum (Orchidaceae). — Biotropica4: 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, R., 1991: Trapping, investigation, and reconstitution of floral scents. — InMüller, P., Lamparsky, D., (Eds): Perfume: art, science, and technology, pp. 213–248. — New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, J. T., Tollsten, L., 1993: Trends in floral scent chemistry in pollination syndromes: floral scent composition in moth-pollinated taxa. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.113: 263–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —,Bergström, G., 1993: Floral scents—a checklist of volatile compounds isolated by head-space techniques. — Phytochemistry33: 253–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H., 1962: Catastrophic selection as a factor in speciation. — Evolution16: 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Lewis, M., 1955: The genusClarkia. — Univ. of Calif. Publ. Bot.20: 241–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G., Liu, H., Liu, T., 1991: Research on the components of volatile oils ofOenothera erythrosepala. — Chinese Medic. Materials14: 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughrin, J., Hamilton-Kemp, T., Andersen, R., Hildebrand, D., 1990: Headspace compounds from flowers ofNicotiana tabacum and related species. — J. Agric. Food Chem.38: 455–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacSwain, J., Raven, P., Thorp, R., 1973: Comparative behavior of bees andOnagraceae. IV.Clarkia bees of the western United States. — Univ. of Calif. Publ. Ent.70: 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, A. C., Lyon, S. C., 1928: Notes on amyl salicylate as an attractant to the tobacco hornworm moth. — J. Econ. Ent.21: 189–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, L. A., 1983: Processes of isolation and introgressive interplay betweenPlatanthera bifolia andP. chlorantha (Orchidaceae). — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.87: 325–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omata, A., Yomogida, K., Nakamura, S., Hashimoto, S., Arai, T., Furukawa, K., 1991: Volatile components ofPlumeria flowers, part 1.Plumeria rubra formaacutifolia “Common Yellow”. — Flav. Fragr. J.6: 277–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellmyr, O., 1986: Three pollination morphs inCimicifuga simplex: incipient speciation due to inferiority in competition. — Oecologia78: 304–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichersky, E., Raguso, R. A., Lewinsohn, E., Croteau, R., 1994: Floral scent production inClarkia (Onagraceae). I. Localization and developmental modulation of monoterpene emission and linalool synthase activity. — Plant Physiol.106 (in press).

  • Raven, P., 1979: A survey of reproductive biology inOnagraceae. — New Zealand J. Bot.17: 575–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, E. D., Ericson, W. A., 1987: Statistics: methods and applications. 2nd edn. — Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler, J., Madlung, J., Rose, A., Ulrich-Seitz, H., 1992: Biosynthesis of p-hydroxybenzoic acid in elicitor-treated carrot cell cultures. — Planta188: 594–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1970: Adapative radiation in reproductive characteristics in angiosperms, I: pollination mechanisms. — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.1: 307–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, W., Curry, K., Whitten, W. M., 1986: Staining fragrance glands in orchid flowers. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club113: 288–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —,Pridgeon, A., 1987: Osmophores ofStanhopea (Orchidaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.74: 1323–1331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teranishi, R., Buttery, R., Kint, S., Takeoka, G., 1991: Chemical composition ofGaura drummondii flower volatiles. — J. Ess. Oil Res.3: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thien, L., Heimermann, W., Holman, R., 1975: Floral odors and quantitative taxonomy ofMagnolia andLiriodendron. — Taxon24: 557–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollsten, L., Bergström, J., 1989: Variation and post-pollination changes in floral odours released byPlatanthera bifolia (Orchidaceae). — Nordic J. Bot.9: 359–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, W., 1981:Oenothera acutisima (Onagraceae), a new species for northwestern Colorado and adjacent Utah. — Syst. Bot.6: 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1986: New taxa inOenothera (Onagraceae). — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.73: 475–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, N., Whitten, W. M., 1983: Orchid floral fragrances and male euglossine bees: methods and advances in the last sesquidecade. — Biol. Bull.164: 355–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazaki, K., Heide, L., Tabata, M., 1991: Formation of p-hydroxybenzoic acid from p-coumaric acid by cell free extract ofLithospermum erythrorhizon cell cultures. — Phytochemistry30: 2233–2236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y., Xu, H., Sun, Y., Wu, Z., Liu, M., 1989: The analysis of aroma components forOenothera odorata fresh flowers. — Acta Bot. Sinica31: 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raguso, R.A., Pichersky, E. Floral volatiles fromClarkia breweri andC. concinna (Onagraceae): Recent evolution of floral scent and moth pollination. Pl Syst Evol 194, 55–67 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983216

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983216

Key words

Navigation