Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosome numbers and rust susceptibility as taxonomic criteria inRosaceae

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BothNeuradoideae andChrysobalanoideae seem rust-free. TheSpiraeoideae andPomoideae are heavily susceptible toGymnosporangium rusts. While thePrunoideae resemble theRosoideae in being vulnerable to attacks ofPuccinia species, they are additionally susceptible toTranzschelia andThekopsora, whereas theRosoideae are characteristically afflicted byPhragmidium.—It is suggested (a) to treat theChrysobalanoideae as a separate family (Chrysobalanaceae), (b) to transferDryas from theRosoideae-Potentilleae-Dryadinae to theRosoideae-Cercocarpeae, and (c) to divide theRosoideae into two main groups of tribes: (i) the rust-freeKerrieae andCercocarpeae with x = 9, and (ii) the rust-susceptiblePotentilleae, Ulmarieae, Roseae andSanguisorbeae with x = 7.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. F., 1921: Observation on the infection ofCrataegus byGymnosporangium. — Mycologia13, 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, S., 1956:Uredinales of West Pakistan. — Biologia2, 26–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexopoulos, C. J., 1940: Some fungi from Greece. — Mycologia32, 326–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. P., 1940: Notes on Alaskan rust fungi. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club67, 413–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J. C., 1901, 1902, 1904: New species ofUredineae, 1, 2, 3. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club28, 661–666;29, 227–231;31, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J. C., 1917: Relationship of the genusKueheola. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club44, 501–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J. C., 1918:Uredinales of Costa Rica based on collections by E. W. D. Holway. — Mycologia10, 111–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J. C., 1920: New species ofUredineae, 12. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club47, 465–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1934: Manual of the Rusts in United States and Canada. — Lafayette, Mass.

  • Arthur, J. C., Cummins, G. B., 1933: Rusts of the Northwest Himalayas. — Mycologia25, 397–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. E. D., Dale, W. T., 1951: Fungi of Trinidad and Tobago. — Mycol. Papers33.

  • Baldwin, J. T., Jr., 1951: Chromosomes ofSpiraea and of certain other genera ofRosaceae. — Rhodora53, 203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bate-Smith, E. C., 1961: Chromatography and taxonomy in theRosaceae, with special reference toPotentilla andPrunus. — J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.)58, 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bate-Smith, E. C., 1962: The phenolic constituents of plants and their taxonomic significance. 1. Dicotyledoneae. — J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.)58, 95–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bate-Smith, E. C., 1965: Investigation of the chemistry and taxonomy of sub-tribeQuillajeae of theRosaceae, using comparisons of fresh and herbarium material. — Phytochem.4, 535–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, G., Hooker, J. D., 1865: Genera Plantarum1. — London.

  • Boedijn, K. B., 1959: TheUredinales of Indonesia. — Nova Hedwigia1, 463–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubák, F., 1908: Die Pilze Böhmens,1. Rostpilze (Uredinales). — Prag.

  • Butler, E. J., Bisby, G. R., 1960: The Fungi of India. — Calcutta.

  • Cave, M. S., 1956–1964: Index to Plant Chromosome Numbers. — Chapel Hill: North Carolina Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Challice, J. S., 1972: Phenolics ofPyrus interspecific hybrids. — Phytochem.11, 3015–3018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Challice, J. S., 1973: Phenolic compounds of the subfamilyPomoideae: a chemotaxonomic survey. — Phytochem.12, 1095–1101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Challice, J. S., Williams, A. H., 1968: Phenolic compounds of the genusPyrus. 2. A chemotaxonomic survey. —Phytochem. 7, 1781–1801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Challice, J. S., Williams, A. H., 1970: Phenolic compounds of the genusPyrus: a chemotaxonomic study of further organ specimens. — Phytochem.9, 1271–1276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristopoulos, P. D., 1953: A contribution to the fungus flora of Greece. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club80, 325–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, I. H., 1934: The hosts, life-history and control of the cedar-appel rust fungusGymnosporangium juniperi-virginianae. — J. Arnold Arb.15, 163–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, I. H., 1935: The hosts, life-history and control ofGymnosporangium clavipes C. & P. — J. Arnold Arb.16, 367–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, I. H., 1936: Two new species ofGymnosporangium from Asia. — J. Arnold Arb.17, 50–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, I. H., 1940: New species ofGymnosporangium. — Canad. J. Res.18, 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, G. B., 1931:Phragmidium species of North America: differential teliospore and aecial characters. — Mycologia23, 433–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, G. B., 1937: Descriptions of tropical rusts. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club64, 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, G. B., 1940:Uredinales of New Guinea. — Mycologia32, 359–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, G. B., 1941:Uredinales of New Guinea, IV. — Mycologia33, 380–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, G. B., 1943: Descriptions of tropical rusts, 5.—Bull. Torrey Bot. Club70, 68–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, G. B., 1943:Uredinales from the northwest Himalaya. — Mycologia35, 446–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Stevenson, J. A., 1956: A check list of North American rust fungi (Uredinales). — Jor. Paper 996.

  • Cunningham, G. H., 1931: The Rust Fungi of New Zealand. — Dunedin: privately printed.

  • Cutter, V. M., 1959: Studies on the isolation and growth of plant rusts in host tissue cultures and upon synthetic media, 1.Gymnosporangium. — Mycologia51, 248–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R., 1975: Angiospermernes taxonomi, 2 & 3. — Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, W. T., 1955: A preliminary list of JamaicanUredinales. — Mycol. Papers60.

  • Darlington, C. D., Wylie, A. P., 1955: Chromosome Atlas of Flowering Plants. — London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. W., 1932: Notes on tropical rusts with descriptions of two new species. — Mycologia24, 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, R. W. G., 1970: Fungous Flora of Venezuela and Adjacent Countries. — Kew Bull., Additional Series3, 139–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa da Camara, E., 1958: Catalogus Systematicus Fungorum Omnium Lusitaniae, 1. Basidiomycetes, 2. — Lisbon.

  • Dietel, P., 1898, 1900, 1902, 1905, 1905:Uredineae japoniceae, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. — Bot. Jahrb.24, 564–576;28, 281–290;32, 47–52;34, 583–592;37, 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietel, P., 1908, 1910:Uredineae japoniceae, 2, 3. — Ann. Mycol.6, 222–229;8, 304–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietel, P., 1912: Über die Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der RostpilzgattungenKuehneola undPhragmidium. — Ann. Mycol.10, 205–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietel, P., 1921: Einige neue oder bemerkenswerte Uredineen. — Ann. Mycol.19, 293–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, B. O., 1915: The effect of the host on the morphology of certain species ofGymnosporangium. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club42, 519–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, B. O., 1918: Studies in the genusGymnosporangium, 2. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club45, 287–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, E. M., 1950: The South African fungi and lichens to the end of 1945. — Bothalia5, 393–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Gazzar, A., 1980: The taxonomic significance of leaf morphology inCrataegus (Rosaceae). — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.101, 457–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Gazzar, A., Badawi, A. A., 1977: The taxonomic significance of chromosome numbers and geography inCrataegus L. — Phytologia35, 271–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedorov, An. A., (Ed.), 1969: Chromosome Numbers of Flowering Plants. — Leningrad: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Focke, W. O., 1894:Rosaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K.: Die natürlichen PflanzenfamilienIII/3. — Leipzig.

  • Fraser, W. P., 1925: Culture experiments with heterocious rusts in 1922, 1923 & 1924. — Mycologia17, 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajewski, W., 1957: A cytological study of the genusGeum. — Monog. Bot.4, 1–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajewski, W., 1959: Evolution in the genusGeum. — Evolution13, 378–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gäumann, E., 1959: Die Rostpilze Mitteleuropas. — Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz12. — Bern.

  • Goldblatt, P., 1976: Cytotaxonomic studies in the tribeQuillajeae (Rosaceae). — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.63, 200–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, P. W., 1918: PhilippineBasidiomycetes, 3. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club45, 451–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyot, A. L., Malençon, G., 1957: Urédinées du Maroc, I. — Trans. Inst. Sci. Chér. Bot.11, 148–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D. H., 1955: Notes on Chinese rust fungi. — Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh21, 301–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D. H., 1957:Uredinales from Asia Minor. — Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh22, 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D. H., 1958: Spanish rust and smut Fungi. — Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh22, 599–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D. H., 1959, 1961, 1964:Uredinales from S.W. Asia, 1, 2, 3. — Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh23, 71–83, 249–258;25, 197–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennings, P., 1902a, b: Fungi japonici, 3, 4. — Bot. Jahrb.31, 728–742;32, 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiratsuka, N., 1927: A contribution to the knowledge of theMelampsoraceae of Hokkaido. — Jap. J. Bot.3, 289–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiratsuka, N., 1935: A contribution to the knowledge of the rust flora in the alpine regions of high mountains in Japan. — Mem. Tottori Agric. Coll.3, 125–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1935:Phragmidium of Japan. — Jap. J. Bot.7, 227–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1958: Revision of taxonomy of thePucciniastreae. — Mem. Fac. Agric. Tokyo Univ. Educ.5, 1–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1958:Uredinales found in the Daisetsuzan National Park Hokkaido, Japan. — Sydowia12, 363–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. J., 1974–1977: Fungi Canadenses. — Ottawa: Nat. Mycol. Herb., Biosystem. Res. Inst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, W. R., 1929: Collections of rusts made in New York State. — Mycologia21, 288–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J., 1964: The Genera of Flowering Plants1. Dicotyledons. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylander, N., Jørstad, I., Nannfeldt, J. A., 1953: EnumeratioUredinearum Scandinavicarum. — Opera Bot.1, 1–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalybetor, B. K., 1969: Mycological Flora of the Mountain Range Alatau. — Alma-Ata.

  • Kari, L. E., 1957: Fungi Exsiccati Fennici. — Publ. Inst. Bot. Univ. Turkuensis6, 1–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, F. D., 1907: New western species ofGymnosporangium andRoestelia. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club34, 459–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, F. D., 1908: Studies in the genusGymnosporangium. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club35, 499–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1928: Fungi of Santo Domingo, 2.Uredinales. — Mycologia20, 60–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1927: Notes on some rusts of Colombia. — Mycologia19, 268–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1930: Fungi of Santo Domingo, 3.Uredinales. — Mycologia22, 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, F. D., Ciferri, R.,Thurston, H. W., Jr., 1933a: The rust flora of the Dominican Republic. — Ann. Mycol.31, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Thurston, H. W., Jr., 1940: A further report on theUredinales of Colombia. — Mycologia32, 621–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —, 1943: Additions to theUredinales of Venezuela, 2. — Mycologia35, 434–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —,Whetzel, H. H., 1933b: Annotated index of the rusts of Colombia. — Mycologia25, 448–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khabiri, E., 1956, 1958: Contribution à la Mycoflore de l'Iran, Deuxième et Troisième Liste. — Rev. Mycol.21, 174–176;23, 408–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuprevicz, V. Th., Tranzschel, V. H., 1957: Flora Plantarum Cryptogamarum URSS, 4. Fungi-Uredinales. — Moscow & Leningrad: Acad. Sci. URSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, P., 1931: Fungi of Iceland. — Bot. Iceland2, 511–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, W. H., Goodding, L. N., 1939: Two new species of rust. — Mycologia31, 570–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLachlan, J. D., 1953: The hosts ofGymnosporangium globosum Farl. and their relative susceptibility. — J. Arnold Arb.16, 98–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mains, E. B., 1939: New and unusual species ofUredinales. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club66, 617–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maire, R., Werner, R. G., 1937: Fungi Maroccani. — Mem. Soc. Sci. Nat. Maroc45, 50–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkoff, K., 1908, 1910: Erster und zweiter Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Pilzflora Bulgariens. — Ann. Mycol.6, 29–36;8, 187–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, D., 1906: The Rusts of Australia. — Melbourne: privately printed.

  • Melchers, L. E., 1931: A check list of plant diseases and fungi occurring in Egypt. — Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci.34, 41–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchior, H., 1964: Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien2, 11. ed. — Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. J., 1973, 1974, 1977: Index to plant chromosome numbers 1967–1971, 1972, 1973–1974. — Regnum Vegetabile90, 228–252;91, 1–108;96, 187–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nattrass, R. M., 1961: Host list of Kenya fungi and bacteria. — Mycol. Papers81, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff, R., 1967, 1968: Index to plant chromosome numbers for 1965, 1966. — Regnum Vegetabile50, 65–67;55, 62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmelee, J. A., 1965: The genusGymnosporangium in eastern Canada. — Canad. J. Bot.43, 239–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1971: The genusGymnosporangium in western Canada. — Canad. J. Bot.49, 903–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. S., 1962: Notes on western rust fungi, 2.Pucciniaceae. — Mycologia54, 389–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrak, F., 1956: Iranische Pilze. — Sydowia10, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangaswami, G., Seshadri, V. S., Channamma, L. K. A., 1970: The Fungi of South India. — India.

  • Riley, E. A., 1960: A revised list of plant diseases in Tanganyka Territory. — Mycol. Papers75, 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Barrueco, C., 1969: The occurrence of nitrogen-fixing root nodules on non-leguminous plants. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.62, 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savile, D. B. O., 1957: Additions to the parasitic fungi of Nova Scotia. — Canad. J. Bot.35, 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1968: Parasite relationships and disposition ofFilipendula. — Brittonia20, 230–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1976: Notes on some parasitic fungi from Southern British Columbia, Southwest Alberta and adjacent United States. — Canad. J. Bot.54, 971–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1979: Fungi as aids in higher plant classification. — Bot. Rev.45, 377–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, T., 1953: Monographia Uredinalium Republicae Popularis Romanicae, II. — Bueuresti: Acad. Republ. Pop. Roman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, A. B., 1929: Host Index of the Fungi of North America. — Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standley, P. C., 1918: Rusts and smuts collected in New Mexico in 1916. — Mycologia10, 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, F. L., 1925: Hawaiian Fungi. — Honolulu: Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, H., 1921: Über einige weitere im südlichen China (Kwangtung-Provinz) gesammelte Pilze. — Ann. Mycol.19, 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, H., 1921: J. Bornmüller: Plantae Macedoniae. Pilze. — Ann. Mycol.19, 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, H., 1938: Fungi himalayenses. — Ann. Mycol.36, 437–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, H., 1939: Fungi exotici exciccati, XII–XV. — Ann. Mycol.37, 270–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, H., Sydow, P., 1910: Fungi Africanae novi. — Bot. Jahrb.45, 259–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, H., Sydow, P., 1914: Beitrag zur Kenntnis der parasitischen Pilze der Insel Formosa. — Ann. Mycol.12, 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1906: Fungi Indiae orientalis, I. — Ann. Mycol.4, 424–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, P., Sydow, H., 1904–1915: Monographia Uredinearum, I–III. — Leipzig: Fratres Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai, F. L., 1947:Uredinales of Western China. — Farlowia3, 95–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R. F., 1976: A phylogenetic classfication of the Angiospermae. — Evol. Biol.9, 35–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurston, H. W., Jr., 1940: The rusts of Minas Geraes, Brazil based on collections by A. S. Müller. — Mycologia32, 290–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Kern, F. D., 1931: Notes on some rust collections from Colorado, Wyoming and South Dakota. — Mycologia23, 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tischler, G., 1950: Chromosomenzahlen der Gefäßpflanzen Mitteleuropas. — Gravenhage: W. Junk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viennot-Bourgin, G., 1944: Nouvelle contribution à l'étude de la Flore Cryptogamique du Valais (Suisse). — Rev. Mycol.9, 37–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1950: Contribution à l'étude des micromycétes de Corse. — Rev. Mycol.15, 80–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, E. M., Hansford, C. G., 1949: Contributions towards the fungus flora of Uganda, 9. TheUredinales of Uganda. — Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond.161, 161–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, W. C. R., 1958: Handbook of the Rubi of Great Britain and Ireland. — Cambridge: The University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiehe, P. O., 1948: The plant diseases and fungi recorded from Mauritius. — Mycol. Papers24, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., Henderson, D. M., 1966: British Rust Fungi. — Cambridge: The University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El-Gazzar, A. Chromosome numbers and rust susceptibility as taxonomic criteria inRosaceae . Pl Syst Evol 137, 23–38 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983201

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983201

Key words

Navigation