Skip to main content
Log in

The two facets of female violence: The public and the domestic domains

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Violent behavior of women varies significantly in the public and private domains. Criminal statistics indicate a relatively low proportion of women among violent offenders in the public domain, while in the domestic and/or private domain statistics reflect almost no gender difference in violent behavior. The following paper proposes a dynamic model which draws upon psychological and sociological variables and suggests that the clue for understanding the paradoxical phenomenon lies in the relative importance the domestic domain plays in the woman's value structure. Among the variables considered were: social learning patterns regarding violent behavior; perception of danger; and the ways in which women express their frustration and/or anger.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azmon, Y. (1983). Some anthropological aspects of gender inequality in the political sphere in tribal societies.Megamot 28: 20–29. (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1978). Learning and behavioral theories of aggression. In Kutash, I. L., Kutash, S. B., Schlesinger, L. B., and Associates (eds.),Violence, Perspective on Murder and Aggression, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 29–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Rafael, E., and Weitman S. (1986). Women and the reconstitution of the family in the Kibbutz.Megamot 29: 306–320. (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, M. L., and Bernard, J. L. (1983). Violent intimacy: The family as a model for love relationships.Fam. Relat. 32: 283–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berko, A., (1989). Masculinization as coping and adaptation to prison technique of female inmates, Bar-Ilan University, Department of Criminology (Hebrew).

  • Bernandez-Binesatti, T. (1978). Women and anger: Conflicts with aggression in contemporary women.J. Am. Med. Worn. Assoc. 33: 215–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A., and Fisher, G. (1978). Women who kill. In Kutash, L. L., Kutash, S. B., Schlesinger, L. B., and Associates (eds.),Violence Perspectives on Murder and Aggression, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp: 178–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cate, R. M., Henton J. M., Koval, J., Christopher, F. S., and Lloyd, S. (1982). Premarital abuse: A social psychological perspective.J. F am. Issues 3: 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claes, J. A., and Rosenthal D. M. (1990). Men who batter women: A study in power.J. Fam. Viol. 5: 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Y., and Ben-David S. (1980). The crime as a function of the situation, the target and the personality.Crime Social Dev. 8: 96–104. (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. (1974). Family structure and feminine personality. In Rosaldo, M. Z., and Lamphere, L. (eds.),Women, Culture and Society, Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. D. (1983).Relations Between Women's Gender Identities and Gender Associated Activities in Crime and Occupation, Ph.D. Ohio State University, Michigan, University Microfilms International.

  • Deal, E. J., and Wampler Smith K. (1986). Dating violence: The primacy of previous experience.J. Social Pers. Relat. 3: 457–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutch, H. (1961).The Psychology of Female, Sifriat HaPoalim, Hakibutz Haarzi Publishing Ltd., Merhavia, Israel. (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, C. (1981).The Cinderella Complex: Women Hidden Fear of Independence, Summit Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskin, M., and Kravitz, M. (1980).Child Abuse and Neglect, U.S. Department of Justice.

  • Fowler, J., and Stockford D. (1980).Leaving it to the wife: A study of abused children and their parents. In Kempe, C. H., Franklin, A. W., Cooper, C. (eds.),The Abused Child in the Family and in the Community, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 851–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, W. D., and Averil, J. R. (1982). Differences between men and women in everyday experience of anger. In Averil, J. R. (ed.),Anger and Aggression: An Essay on Emotion, SSSp, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 281–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. J. (1980). Violence in the family: A review of research in the seventies.J. Marr. Fam. 42: 873–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R., and Straus, M. A. (1979). Determinants of violence in the family: Toward a theoretical integration. In Burr, W. R., Hill, R., Nye, F. I., and Reiss, I. L. (eds.),Contemporary Theories About the Family: Research Based Theories, Vol I, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982).In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A. B. (1982). Female criminals. Behavior and treatment within the criminal justice system.Crim. Just. Behav. 9: 341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, J. (1978). Menstrual cycles and criminal responsibility.Law Hum. Behav. 2: 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israeli Police (1990).Yearly Report (Hebrew).

  • Kohlberg, L. A. (1966). Cognitive-developmental analysis of children's sex-role concepts and attitudes. In Maccobey, E. E. (ed.),The Development of Sex Differences, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence. The cognitive-development approach to socialization. In Goslin, D. A. (ed.),Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, Rand MacNally.

  • Lane, K. E. and Gwartney-Gibbs (1985). Violence in the context of dating and sex.J. Fam. Issues 6: 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace J. M. 1983. Life Events Stress and Courtship Violence.Fam. Relat. 32: 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L. L., and Rose P. (1987). Gender, stress and violence in the adult relationships of a sample of college students.J. Social Pers. Relat. 4: 299–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCord, J., and Otten L. (1983). A Consideration of Sex Roles and Motivations for Crime.Crim. Just. Behav. 10: 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1975).Power: The Inner Experience, Irvington, New York.

  • Mednik, S. A., Pollock V., Volavka, J., and Gabrielli, W. F., Jr. (1982). Biology and violence. In Wolfgang, M. E., and Weiner, N. A. (eds.),Criminal Violence, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 21–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mergargee, E. I. (1982). Psychological determinants and correlates of criminal violence. In Wolfgang, M. E., and Einere, N. A. (eds.),Criminal Violence, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 81–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. B. (1983).Colloquium: The Construction of Anger in Women and Men, Work in Progress, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA, No. 83-01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachshon, I. (1980). Biosocial approaches in criminology.Crime Social Dev. 8: 76–85 (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachshon, I. (1988).Psychobiology of the Human Aggression, The Open University, Tel-Aviv (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagelow, M. O. (1981). Women Battering: Victims and Their Experiences, Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasko, G. (1979). Significance and features of female criminality.Acta Juridicia Academia Hungaricae, Tomus, 21: 105–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Research Committee on Female Crime, Japan (1986). A Study on the Victim of Homicide Committed by Female. In Miyazawa K., and Ohya M. (eds.),Victimology in Comparative Perspective, Seibundo Publishing Co. Ltd., Tokyo, pp. 272–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, M. Z. (1974). Woman, Culture, and Society: A Theoretical Overview. In Rosaldo, M. Z., and Lamphere, L. (eds.),Woman Culture Society, Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (1986). When battered women use violence: Husband-abuse or self-defense.Via. Viol. 1: 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoham, S., Ben-David S., Vadmani R., Atar, J., and Fleming, S. (1973). In Shoham, S. (ed.),Israel Studies in Criminology, Gomeh Publishing House, Tel-Aviv, No. 2: 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoham, S., Ben-David S., and Rahav G. (1975). Interaction in Violence.Hum. Relat. 27: 417–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. (1975).Women and Crime, Lexington, MA.

  • Smith, C. P., Berkman, D. J., and Fraser, W. M. (1980). The Shadow of Distress, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, E. (1978). The aggressive female. In Kutash, I., Kutash, S. B., and Assoc.Violence: Perspectives: On Murder and Aggression, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, T. (1980). History and demography of child abuse. In Cook, J. V. (ed.),Child Abuse: Commission and Omission, Butterworths, Toronto, pp. 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spatz-Widom, C., and Ames, A. (1985). Biology and female crime,Paper Presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Biological Bases of Antisocial Behavior, September, Lucca, Italy.

  • Steinmetz, K. S. (1977–78). The battered husband syndrome.Victimology 3–4: 499–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1980). Family pattern and child abuse in a nationally representative American sample. In Kemp, C. H., Franklin, A. W., and Cooper, C. (eds.),The Abused Child in the Family and Community, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 213–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1980).Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Doubleday/Anchor, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesterdal, J. (1980). Psychological mechanisms in child abusing parents. In Cook, J. V., and Bowles, R. B. (eds.),Child Abuse: Commission and Omission, ButterWorths, Toronto, pp. 165–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M. E., and Ferracutti F. (1982).The Subculture of Violence, Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yllo, K., and Straus, M. A. (1981). Interpersonal Violence Among Married and Cohabiting Couples.Fam. Relat. 30: 339–347.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben-David, S. The two facets of female violence: The public and the domestic domains. J Fam Viol 8, 345–359 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00978098

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00978098

Key words

Navigation