Abstract
This analysis is concerned with the horizontal and vertical consensus of definitions of work appropriate to accomplish the goals of university administrators and faculty, as well as the congruency of ideal (intent) and actual (action/behavior) work of faculty. Data-gathering techniques include the following: historical analysis of the university; interviews with the provost, 5 college deans, and 32 chairpersons; and a survey of 503 faculty (69% return rate). Faculty work perceived to achieve departmental goals lacked horizontal consensus, especially among chairpersons in the same college and among faculty in the same department. Vertical consensus was weak, especially between chairpersons and their faculty, and in most colleges between deans and chairpersons. Greatest incongruencies were between faculty intentions and reported actions. There was declining support for administrative goals as one moved down the hierarchical structure within the university. Perspectives were explored that account for the lack of goal consensus and the incongruency between intentions and reported actions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, G. T.Essense of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown, 1971.
Bacharach, S. B. and Lawler, E. J.Power and Politics in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.
Baldridge, J. V.Power and Conflict in the University. New York: Wiley, 1971.
Baldridge, J. V., Curtis, D., Ecker, G., and Riley, G. L.Policy Making and Effective Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1978.
Child, J. Organization structure, environment and performance—the role of strategic choice.Sociology 1972,6 (January), 1–22.
Cohen, M. D., and March, J. G.Leadership and Ambiguity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P. A garbage can model of organizational choice.Administrative Science Quarterly 1972,17 (1), 1–25.
Crozier, M., and Friedberg, E.L'Actuer el le systeme: Les contraintes de l'action collective. Paris: Editions due Seuil, 1977.
Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
Dalton, M. Conflicts between staff and line managerial officers.American Sociological Review 1950,15 (June), 341–351.
Dornbush, S. M., and Scott, W. R., with the assistance of Bushing, B. C., and Laing, J. D.Evaluation and the Exercise of Authority. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.
Dowling, J., and Pfeffer, J. Organizational legitimacy.Pacific Sociological Review 1975,18 (January), 122–136.
Firth, R.Essays on Social Organizations: A Sociological Reader. New York: Holt, 1964.
Gallie, D.In Search of the New Working Class. London: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
Gamson, W.Power and Discontent. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1967.
Glassman, R. B. Persistence and loose coupling in living systems.Behavioral Science 1973,18 83–98.
Goffman, E.Asylums. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Anchor Books, 1961.
Goldman, P., and Van Houten, D. R. Managerial strategies and work: A marxist analysis of bureaucracy.The Sociological Quarterly 1977,18 (Winter), 108–125.
Gross, E. Universities as organizations: A research approach.American Sociological Review 1968,33 518–544.
Hagstrom, W. O.The Scientific Community. New York: Basic Books, 1965.
Harmon, L. R.Profiles of Ph.D.'s in the Sciences. Washington: National Academy of Sciences — National Research Council, 1965.
Heydebrand, W. (Ed.).Comparative Organizations: The Results of Empirical Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
Hill, W., and French, W. Perceptions of the power of departmental chairmen by professors.Administrative Science Quarterly 1967,11 548–574.
Kanter, R. M.Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1977.
Karpik, L. Sociologie, economie, politique et buts des organizations de production.Revue Francais de Sociologie 1972,13 299–324.
March, J. Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choices.Bell Journal of Economics 1978,9 587–608.
March, J. G., and Olsen, J. Choice situations in loosely coupled world. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, 1975.
March, J. G., and Olsen, J.Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget, 1976.
Mechanic, D. Sources of power of lower participants in complex organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly 1962,7 349–364.
Merton, R. K.Social Theory and Social Structure (2nd ed.). Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1957.
Metz, M. H.Classrooms and Corridors. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
Meyer, J., and Rowan, B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.American Journal of Sociology 1977,83 340–363.
Miles, R. H. Role-set configuration as a predictor of role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations.Sociometry 1977,40 21–34.
Mitchell, T. R., and Biglan, A. Instrumentality theories: Current uses in psychology.Psychological Bulletin 1971,76 436–454.
Ouchi, W. Coupled versus uncoupled control in organizational hierarchies. In Marshall Meyer and associates (Eds.),Environments and Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1978.
Parsons, T. A sociological approach to the theory of organizations. In hisStructure and Process in Modern Societies. Glencoe, Ill. Free Press, 1964.
Perrow, C. Organizational theory in a society of organizations. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Boston, 1979.
Pettigrew, A.Politics of Organizational Decision Making. London: Tavistock, 1973.
Pfeffer, J.Power in Organizations. Marshfield, Mass.: Pitman, 1981.
Robin, I. Loose structure, retrenchment and adaptability in the university.Sociology of Education 1979,52 211–222.
Roy, D. Quota restriction and goldbricking in a machine shop.American Journal of Sociology 1952,57 427–442.
Scott, W. R.Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1981.
Silverman, D.The Theory of Organizations: A Sociological Framework. New York: Basic Books, 1971.
Stone, K. The origins of job structures in the steel industry.The Review of Radical Political Economics 1974,6 61–97.
Strauss, A., Schatzman, L., Ehrlich, D., Bucher, R., and Sabshin, M. The hospital and its negotiated order. In E. Friedson (Ed.),The Hospital in Modern Society. New York: Free Press, 1963.
Tuman, N. B., and Grimes, A. J. A comparison of models of role orientations of professionals in a research-oriented university.Administrative Science Quarterly 1981,26 187–206.
Udy, S. H. The comparative analysis of organizations. In J. H. March (Ed.),Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1965.
Wamsley, G. L., and Zald, M. N.The Political Economy of Public Organizations. Lexington, Mass.: Heath, 1973.
Weick, K. E.The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
Weick, K. E. Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems.Administrative Science Quarterly 1976,21 1–11.
Zald, M. N. Political economy: A framework for comparative analysis. In Mayer N. Zald (Ed.),Power in Organizations. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1970.
Zey-Ferrell, M. Criticisms of the dominant perspective on organizations.The Sociological Quarterly 1981,22 (Spring), 181–205.
Zuckerman, H., and Merton, R. K. Patterns of evaluation in science: Instructuralization, structure and functions of the referee system.Minerva 1971,9 66–100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zey-Ferrell, M., Baker, P.J. Faculty work in a regional public university: An empirical assessment of goal consensus and congruency of actions and intentions. Res High Educ 20, 399–426 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974921
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974921