Skip to main content
Log in

Faculty and administrator perceptions of their environments: Different views or different models of organization?

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Individuals' perceptions of the culture and climate of the organizations in which they work influence their motivation and individual performance. Using a theoretical model of institutional culture, organizational climate, and faculty motivation, this study examines how faculty and academic administrators differ in their perceptions; whether these differences in perceptions are affected by institutional type; and to what extent faculty and administrators have different implicit models of their institutions (i.e., see different organizational variables as predictors of faculty motivation and involvement). The goals of this investigation are to shed additional light on the relationship between institutional variables and faculty performance, to examine the existence of differing implicit models, and to provide new insights for administrators in managing their postsecondary institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allaire, Yuan, and Firsiruto, Mihaela E. (1984). Is “organizational culture” culture bound?Human Resource Management 25: 72–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, Ann E, and Gamson, Zelda F. (1983).Academic Workplace: New Demands, Heightened Tensions. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report No. 10. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, Estella M. (1987, November). The meaning of “good presidential leadership”: A Frame analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Baltimore.

  • Birnbaum, Robert (1987, November). Individual preferences and organizational goals. Consistency and diversity in the futures desired by campus leaders. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Baltimore.

  • Blackburn, Robert T., Lawrence, Janet, and Associates (1990).Same Institution, Different Perceptions: Faculty and Administrators Report on the Work Environment. Publication of the National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, Robert T., Pitney, Judith A., Lawrence, Janet H., and Trautvetter, Lois (1989, March). Administrators' career backgrounds and their congruence with faculty beliefs and behaviors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Bowen, Howard R., and Schuster, Jack H. (1986).American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Kim S., and Ettington, Deborah R. (1988). The conceptual framework of organizational culture. In John C Smart (ed.),Higher Education: Handbood of Theory and Research, vol. 6, pp. 356–396. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardozier, V. R. (1984). Upper-level colleges yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Educational Record 65(3): 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, Ellen E., and Tierney, William G. (1988).Collegiate Culture and Leadership Strategies. New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Burton, R. (1970).The Distinctive College: Antioch, Reed, and Swarthmore. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemans, William V. (1966).An Analytical and Empirical Examination of Some Properties of Ipsative Measures. Psychometric Monograph, Number 14. Richmond, VA: The William Byrd Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corson, John J. (1960).Governance of Colleges and Universities. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Todd M., and Chissom, Brad (1981, October). Factor analysis (R-technique) of ipsatized data may be misleading.Psychological Reports 49(2): 643–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, Joe A., and Edison, Donald R. (1985).The Idea of an Ideal Liberal Arts College. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., and Jones, A. P. (1974) Organizational climate: A review of theory and research.Psychological Bulletin 81:1096–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Charles E., Wood, Robert, and Blinkhorn, S. F. (1988, June). Spuriouser and spuriouser: The use of ipsative personality tests.Journal of Occupational Psychology 61(2): 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. P., and James, L. R. (1979). Psychological climate: Dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated work environment perceptions.Organizational Behavior and Performance 23:201–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martines, Lauro (1985, Spring). Large and little school teaching: Reed College and UCLA.American Scholar 54: 194–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moussavi, Farzad, Jones, Thomas W., and Cronan, Timothy P. (1990, April). Explaining psychological climate: Is perceptual agreement necessary?Journal of Social Psychology 130: 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Anna (1987, November). Defining “good faculty leadership”: Interpretations of professors and presidents. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Baltimore.

  • Peterson, Marvin W., and Spencer, Melinda G. (1990). Assessing academic culture and climate. In William G. Tierney (ed.),Assessing Organizational Climate and Culture (New Directions in Institutional Research, No. 68), pp. 3–18. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Marvin, W., Blackburn, Robert, Gamson, Zelda F., et al. (1978).Black Students on White Campuses: The Impacts of Increased Black Enrollments. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Marvin W., Cameron, Kim S., Mets, Lisa A., Jones, Phillip, and Ettington, Deborah R. (1986).The Organizational Context for Teaching and Learning: A Review of the Research Literature. Publication of the National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. W., Cameron, K. S., Knapp, A., Spencer, M. G., and White, T H. (1991).Assessing the Organizational Context for Teaching and Learning: An Institutional Self-Study Manual. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI: NCRIPTAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, Eugene, and Austin, Ann E. (1988, March–April). High faculty morale: What exemplary colleges do right.Change 20: 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, Edgar H. (1985).Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, Pinchas, and Lunetta, Vincent N. (1977, November–December). A comparison of ipsative and normative procedures in the study of cognitive preferences.Journal of Educational Research 71(2): 86–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoreson, Richard W., Kardash, Carol Anne M., Leuthold, David A., and Morrow, Kelly A. (1990). Gender differences in the academic career.Research in Higher Education 31(2): 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, Noel (1983).Managing Strategic Change: Technical, Political, and Cultural Dynamics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, William G. (1989).Curricular Landscapes, Democratic Vistas: Transformative Leadership in Higher Education. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Theodore H. (1990). Differences in faculty and administrator perceptions of their institutions: Implications for institutional performance. Unpublished doctoral preliminary examination. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported in this paper is part of the Research Program on The Organizational Context for Teaching and Learning in the National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning (NCRIPTAL). The research is supported by a grant from the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education (ED), to the University of Michigan (grant number G008690010). The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the OERI/ED or the Regents of The University of Michigan, and no official endorsement should be inferred.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peterson, M.W., White, T.H. Faculty and administrator perceptions of their environments: Different views or different models of organization?. Res High Educ 33, 177–204 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973578

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973578

Keywords

Navigation