Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric evaluation of the dating anxiety survey: A self-report questionnaire for the assessment of dating anxiety in males and females

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Dating Anxiety Survey (DAS) was constructed to assess dating anxiety in males and females. Factor analysis of the survey revealed three factors: passive contact, active intentions for dating, and dating interactions. The reliabilities of the three subscales, as determined by coefficient alpha, were .87, .91, and .93 for males and .90, .90, and .92 for females, respectively. Correlations with dating history and a measure of social anxiety were generally of a low but significant magnitude, providing some support for concurrent validity. The results of the factor analysis lend support to the construct validity of the DAS. These findings suggest that the DAS is a potentially useful instrument in the self-report of dating anxiety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borkovec, T. D., Stone, N. M., O'Brien, G. T., & Kaloupek, D. G. (1974). Evaluation of a clinically relevant target behavior for analog outcome research.Behavior Therapy, 5, 503–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, J. D. (1984).Behavioral assessment of social skills and dating anxiety in female college students. Unpublished master's thesis. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Glass, D. C. (1976). The self-consciousness scale: A discriminant validity study.Journal of Personality Assessment, 40, 169–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1978). Self-focusing effects of dispositional self-consciousness, morror presence, and auditory presence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 324–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981).Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrey, A. L. (1973).A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J. P., & Gilbert, F. S. (1975). A test of the relative effectiveness of a systematic desensitization program and an interpersonal skills training program with date anxious subjects.Behavior Therapy, 6, 510–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J. P., Wallander, J. L., & Farrell, A. D. (1985). Heterosocial skills training. In L. L'Abate & M. A. Milan (Eds.),Handbook of social skills training and research (pp. 136–169). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and provate self-consciousness: Assessment and theory.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, S., & Nawas, M. (1973). Treatment of polysomatic or global problems by systematic desensitization. In R. Rubin (Ed.),Advances in behavior therapy. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galassi, J. P., & Galassi, M. D. (1979). Modification of heterosocial skills deficits. In A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (Eds.),Research and practice in social skills training (pp. 131–187). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, C. R., Gottman, J. M., & Shmurak, S. H. (1976). Response-acquisition and cognitive self-statement modification approaches to dating-skills training.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23, 520–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, B. J. (1979).Psychometric validation of the Interaction Scale: A self-report questionnaire for the assessment of heterosexual-social anxiety in males. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, W. D., & Zerface, J. P. (1970). Comparison of individual counseling in a social program with nondaters.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 17, 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehm, L. P., & Marsten, A. R. (1968). Reduction of social anxiety through modification of self-reinforcement: An instigation therapy technique.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 565–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, F. C., & Tasto, D. L. (1976). Development and factor analysis of a social anxiety inventory.Behavior Therapy, 7, 453–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. F. (1980). Effects of public and private self-consciousness on public expression of personal beliefs.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 514–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sechrest, L. (1984). Reliability and validity. In A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (eds.),Research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 24–54). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shmurak, S. H. (1973).A comparison of types of problems encountered by college students and psychiatric inpatients in social situations. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Turner, R. G., Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Ickes, W. (1978). Correlates of self-consciousness.Journal of Personality Assessment, 42, 285–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twentyman, C. T., & McFall, R. M. (1975). Behavioral training of social skills in shy males.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 384–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L., & Ciminero, A. R. (1978). Development and validation of a heterosocial skills inventory: The Survey of Heterosexual Interactions for Females.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 1547–1548.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Calvert, J.D., Moore, D. & Jensen, B.J. Psychometric evaluation of the dating anxiety survey: A self-report questionnaire for the assessment of dating anxiety in males and females. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 9, 341–350 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00964562

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00964562

Key words

Navigation