Skip to main content
Log in

The cognitive-somatic anxiety questionnaire: Psychometric and validity data

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Cognitive-Somatic Anxiety Questionnaire (CSAQ) is a 14-item self-report inventory that is divided into two 7-item scales (Cognitive and Somatic) that appear to reflect cognitive or somatic anxiety. In an attempt to evaluate the construct validity of this multidimensional instrument, the CSAQ was administered to 109 college students along with several other measures of physical and psychological symptoms. The results suggest that (a) despite considerable overlap between the Cognitive and the Somatic scales (r=.62), an exploratory factor analysis is able to identify a single large somatic factor along with three lesser cognitive-appearing factors, and (b) the correlations with concurrent measures of related constructs provide some limited evidence of the construct validity of the CSAQ. For males, both the Cognitive and the Somatic scales of the CSAQ correlated significantly with several anxietyrelated measures. However, for females CSAQ scores correlated less consistently with the other test scales, although Somatic scale scores for females were positively related to measures of health and exercise involvement. Suggestions for improving the CSAQ are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1978).The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. E. (1970).Essentials of psychological testing (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. E., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological test.Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. J., & Schwartz, G. E. (1976). The psychobiology of relaxation and related states: A multi-process theory. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.),Behavior control and modification of physiological activity (pp. 399–422). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGood, D. E., Buckelew, S. P., & Tait, R. C. (1985). Cognitive-somatic anxiety response patterning in chronic pain patients and nonpatients.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 137–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., & Covi, L. (1973). The SCL-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale.Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 9, 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. W., Zeichner, A., & Greene, P. (1984). Gender differences on the Cognitive-Somatic Anxiety Questionnaire.Psychological Reports, 55, 123–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, R., & Rachman, R. (1974). Dysynchrony in measures of fear.Behavior Research and Therapy, 12, 319–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K. & Brent, D. H. (1975).Statistical package for the

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 23, 87–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, J. (1967). Somatic response patterning and stress: Some revisions of activation theory. In M. H. Appley & R. Trumbull (Eds.),Psychological stress (pp. 14–36). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmo, R. (1959). Hull, C. H. Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., & Brent, D. H. (1975).Statistical

  • Malmo, R. (1959). Activation. A neuropsychological dimension.Psychological Review, 66, 367–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, G. R., & Johnson, W. E. (1983). A comparison of two relaxation procedures for reducing cognitive and somatic anxiety.Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 14, 209–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, G. E. (1978). Psychological foundations of psychotherapy and behavior change. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (2nd ed.), (pp. 63–99). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, G. E., Davidson, R. J., & Goleman, D. J. (1978). Patterning of cognitive and somatic processes in the self-regulation of anxiety: Effects of mediation versus exercise.Psychosomatic Medicine, 40, 321–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, L., & Adams, G. (1979). The diagnosis and management of anxiety for primary care physicians. In W. E. Fann, I. Karacan, A. D. Pokorny, & R. L. Williams (Eds.),Phenomenology and treatment of anxiety (pp. 19–42). Jamaica, NY: Spectrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970).STAI manual. Pal Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamaren, A. J., Carney, R. M., & Allen, T. W. (1985). Assessment of cognitive and somatic anxiety: A preliminary validity study.Behavioral Assessment, 7, 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. M. (1978). Correlational procedures for research. New York: Gardner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk, D. C., Meichenbaum, D., & Genest, M. (1983).Pain and behavioral medicine: A cognitive-behavioral perspective. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, D. A., Schwartz, G. E., & Davidson, R. J. (1979). Low-anxious, high-anxious, and repressive coping styles: Psychometric patterns and behavioral and physiological responses to stress.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeGood, D.E., Tait, R.C. The cognitive-somatic anxiety questionnaire: Psychometric and validity data. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 9, 75–87 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00961633

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00961633

Key words

Navigation