Skip to main content
Log in

Using self-evaluation to improve difficult-to-read handwriting of secondary students

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We used delayed multiple-baseline and multiple-probe techniques to assess the effects of self-evaluation training on the legibility of cursive handwriting. Five secondary special education students with difficult-to-read handwriting served as participants. All participants improved the legibility of their handwriting during self-evaluation training. A systematic withdrawal of the training package demonstrated maintenance of treatment effects. For the most part, the students' handwriting remained at least 90% legible to judges following the systematic withdrawal of the self-evaluation training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Askov, E., Otto, W., & Askov, W. (1970). A decade of research in handwriting.Journal of Educational Research, 64, 100–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azrin, N. H. (1977). A strategy for applied research: learning based but outcome oriented.American Psychologist, 32, 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. M., & Fowler, S. A. (1984). How should we measure the potential for self-control procedures for generalized educational outcomes? In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.),Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 145–162). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, K. E., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1988). Remediating handwriting difficulties with learning disabled students: A review.British Columbia Journal of Special Education, 12, 101–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgio, L. D., Whitman, T. L., & Johnson, J. A. (1980). A self-instructional package for increasing attending behavior in educable mentally retarded children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 443–459.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duval, B. (1985).Evaluation of eleventh grade students' writing supports teaching italic handwriting. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 263 608)

  • Giordano, G. (1982). CATS exercises: Teaching disabled writers to communicate.Academic Therapy, 18, 233–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heward, W. L. (1978).The delayed multiple-baseline design. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.

  • Heward, W. L., Heron, T. E., Gardner, R., & Prayzer, R. (1991). Two strategies for improving students' writing skills. In G. Stoner, M. R. Shinn, & H. M. Walker (Eds.),Interventions for achievement and behavior problems (pp. 379–398). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. D., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple-baseline.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, J. C., Trap, J., & Cooper, J. O. (1977). Technical report: Students' self-recording of manuscript letter strokes.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 509–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosiewicz, M. M., Hallahan, D. P., Lloyd, J., & Graves, A. W. (1982). Effects of self-instruction and self-correction procedures on handwriting performance.Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 5, 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, M. L. (1986). Responding to renewed emphasis on handwriting.Clearinghouse, 59, 211–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F., Mabee, W. S., Byram, B. J., & Reiter, S. M. (1987). Effects of academic positive practice and response cost on writing legibility of behaviorally disordered and learning-disabled junior high school students.Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 4(3), 216–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, C. D., & Mercer, A. R. (1989).Teaching students with learning problems (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. D., Hall, S. W., & Heward, W. L. (1991).Effects of sequential 1-minute time trials, with and without inter-trial feedback, on regular and special education students' fluency with math facts. Unpublished manuscript, The Ohio State University, Department of Educational Services and Research, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelli, E. (1982). Penmanship: Neglected tool in teacher preparation.Teacher-Educator, 18, 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okyere, B. A., & Heron, T. E. (1991). Use of self-correction to improve spelling in regular education classrooms. In G. Stoner, M. R. Shinn, & H. M. Walker (Eds.),Interventions for achievement and behavior problems (pp. 399–413). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, M., Askov, E., & Fairchild, S. (1980). Another decade of research in handwriting: Progress and prospects.Journal of Educational Research, 73, 283–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruedy, L. R. (1983). Handwriting instruction: It can be part of the high school curriculum.Academic 20 Therapy, 18, 421–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusch, F. R., & Kazdin, A. E. (1981). Toward a methodology of withdrawal designs for assessment of response maintenance.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 131–140.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sainato, D. M., Strain, P. S., Lefebvre, D., & Rapp, N. (1990). Effects of self-evaluation on the independent work skills of preschool children with disabilities.Exceptional Children, 56, 540–549.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. Reading Teacher, 32, 403–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J., Stoutimore, J., Wolking, W., & Harris, C. (1990). Challenging reading: For students with mild handicaps.Teaching Exceptional Children, 22, 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sindelar, P. T., & Stoddard, K. (1991). Teaching reading to mildly disabled students in regular classes. In G. Stoner, M. R. Shinn, & H. M. Walker (Eds.),Interventions for achievement and behavior problems (pp. 333–355). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowitschek, J. J., Ghezzi, P. M., & Safely, K. N. (1987). “I'd rather do it myself:” Self-evaluation and correction of handwriting.Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, W. J., Omness, C. K., Janusz, K. L., & Cooper, J. O. (1992). Adult literacy and Precision Teaching: Repeated readings and see/cover/write practice to improve reading and spelling.The Journal of Precision Teaching, 9, 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbert-Johnson, C., Salva, E., Sweeney, W. J., & Cooper, J. O. (1991). Cursive handwriting: Function rather than topography.Journal of Educational Research, 85, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sweeney, W.J., Salva, E., Cooper, J.O. et al. Using self-evaluation to improve difficult-to-read handwriting of secondary students. J Behav Educ 3, 427–443 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00961545

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00961545

Key words

Navigation