Skip to main content
Log in

Artifact in pain ratings, its implications for test-retest reliability, and correction by a new scaling procedure

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conventionally employed procedure for rating ischemic pain was found to produce a degree of response bias associated with the ceiling points of the scale used. A new approach permitting open-ended ratings followed by transformation of these ratings into a common decile scale provided far greater test-retest reliability. This was explained largely in terms of the attenuation of rating artifact. The new procedure also gave rise to consistently linear functions for ischemic pain. Implications are raised for the measurement of pain as well as other psychological continua.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beecher, H. K. (1957). The measurement of pain.Pharmacological Review, 9, 59–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecher, H. K. (1959).Measurement of subjective responses. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecher, H. K. (1975). Quantification of the subjective pain experience. In M. Weisenberg (Ed.),Pain: Clinical and experimental perspectives (pp. 56–66). St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. R., Casey, K. L., Dubner, R., Foley, K. M., Gracely, R. H., & Reading, A. E. (1985). Pain measurement: An overview.Pain, 22, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. D., Steger, H. G., & Jennison, J. H. (1979). Ratio scaling of pain perception with the submaximum effort tourniquet technique.Pain, 7, 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, S. (1964). The relationship of experimental pain tolerance to pain threshold.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 18, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, J. D., Wolff, H. G., & Goodell, H. (1952).Pain sensations and reactions. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard, E. (1967). A quantitative study of pain and its reduction through hypnotic suggestion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 57, 1581–1586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, J. I., & Bairstow, P. J. (1971). The compression block technique: A note on procedure.Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 313–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T., Pickering, G. W., & Rothschild, P. (1931). Observations upon muscular pain in intermittent claudication.Heart, 15, 359–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, P. A., Duncan, G. H., Scott, D. S., Gregg, J. M., & Ghia, J. N. (1979). The submaximal effort tourniquet test: Its use in evaluating experimental and chronic pain.Pain, 6, 375–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, J. (1984). A modified submaximal effort tourniquet technique for evaluation of analgesics in healthy volunteers.Pain, 19, 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postlethwaite, R., Grieve, N., Santacroce, T., Renfree, L., Wilson, G., & Peck, C. (1980). An analysis of pain produced by the submaximum effort tourniquet test. In C. Peck & M. Wallace (Eds.),Problems in pain: Proceedings of the First Australia-New Zealand Conference on Pain. (pp. 128–135). Sydney: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Procacci, P., Zoppi, M., & Maresca, M. (1979). Experimental pain in man.Pain, 6, 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. M., & Beecher, H. K. (1968). Experimental production of pain in man: Sensitivity of a new method to 600 mg of aspirin.Clinical and Pharmacological Therapeutics, 10, 213–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. M., Egbert, L. D., Markowitz, R. A., Mosteller, F., & Beecher, H. K. (1966). An experimental pain method sensitive to morphine in man: The submaximal effort tourniquet technique.Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 154, 324–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. M., Lowenstein, E., Hubbard, J. H., & Beecher, H. K. (1968). Experimental pain produced by the submaximal effort tourniquet technique: Further evidence of validity.Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 163, 468–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. M., Chiang, H. T., Kitz, R. J., & Anton, A. (1974). Accupuncture and experimentally induced pain. In J. J. Bonica (Ed.),Advances in neurology, volume 4: International Symposium on Pain (pp. 827–832). New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternbach, R. A., Murphy, R. W., Timmermans, G., Greenhoot, J. H., & Akeson, W. H. (1974). Measuring the severity of clinical pain. In J. J. Bonica (Ed.),Advances in neurology, volume 4: International Symposium on Pain (pp. 281–288). New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk, D. C. (1977).A coping skills-training approach for the control of experimentally-produced pain. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Frey, M. (1897). Untersuchungen iiber die Sinnesfunctionen der menschlichen Haut. I. Druckempfindungen und Schmerz. Ber. Verhandl. Sachs. Ges. Wiss. Leipzig.Math-Phys. Kl., 49, 169–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Graffenried, B., Adler, R., Abt, K., Nuesch, E., & Spiegel, R. (1978). The influence of anxiety and pain sensitivity on experimental pain in man.Pain, 4, 253–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, B. B. (1977). The role of laboratory pain induction methods in the systematic study of human pain.Acupuncture and Electro-Therapeutic Research, 2, 271–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, B. B. (1980). Measurement of human pain. In J. J. Bonica (Ed.),Pain (pp. 173–189). New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernandez, E. Artifact in pain ratings, its implications for test-retest reliability, and correction by a new scaling procedure. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 12, 1–15 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960450

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960450

Key words

Navigation