Abstract
Directiveness and nondirectiveness in genetic counseling are poorly understood on the operational level, and information about what counselors allege they do and what actually is done in practice is lacking. Although they are often thought of as diametrically opposite approaches, when viewed as strategies of persuasion, their similarities become more apparent. Directive counselors attempt to influence the counselee's behavior, whereas nondirective ones attempt to influence the latter's thinking processes; there is need for both approaches. Directiveness may also sometimes occur because of inadequate interview skills. The case made for directiveness is discussed and critiqued, available research is reviewed, and suggestions for future studies are advanced.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antley RM (1979) The genetic counselor as facilitator of the counselee's decision process. In: Capron AM, Lappe M, Murray RM, Powledge TM, Twiss SB, Bergsma D (eds)Genetic Counseling: Facts, Values, and Norms. BD:OAS, XV(2):137–168.
Bell NK (1990) Medical ethicist responds to issue of non-directiveness in genetic counseling setting.Perspect Gen Counsel 12(4):5.
Christodorescu D (1980) Genetic counselling for neurological and psychic diseases. I. Data on counsellees and their pre- and post-counselling family planning.Rev Roum Med Neurol Psychiat 18:269–279.
Czeizel A, Metneki J, Osztovics M (1981) Evaluation of information-guidance genetic counselling.J Med Genet 18:91–98.
Fraser FC (1979) Degree of directiveness. In: Lubs HA, de la Cruz F (eds)Genetic Counseling. New York: Raven Press, pp 579–581.
Frets PG, Duivenvoorden HJ, Verhage F, Niermeijer MF, van den Berge SMM, Galjaard H (1990) Factors influencing the reproductive decision after genetic counseling.Am J Med Genet 35:496–502.
Fujita N (1979) Genetic counselling: Follow-up study.Metab Pediat Ophthal 3:237–246.
Haley J (1963)Strategies in Psychotherapy. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Karp LE (1983) Genetic drift: The terrible question.Am J Med Genet 14:1–4.
Kessler S (1989) Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. VI. A critical review of the literature dealing with education and reproduction.Am J Med Genet 34:340–353.
Klein D, Wyss D (1977) Retrospective and follow up study of approximately 1000 genetic consultations.J Genet Hum 25:47–57.
Lubs ML (1979) Does genetic counseling influence risk attitudes and decision making? In: Epstein CJ, Curry CJR, Packman S, Sherman S, Hall BD (eds)Risk, Communication, and Decision Making in Genetic Counseling. BD:OAS, XV(5C):355–367.
Pauker SP, Pauker SG (1979) The amniocentesis decision: An explicit guide for parents. In: Epstein CJ, Curry CJR, Packman S, Sherman S, Hall BD (eds)Risk, Communication, and Decision Making in Genetic Counseling. BD:OAS, V(5C):289–324.
Shiloh S, Saxe L (1989) Perception of risk in genetic counseling.Psychol Health 3:45–61.
Sissine FJ, Rosser L, Steele MW, Marchese S, Garver KL, Berman N (1981) Statistical analysis of genetic counseling impacts.Eval Rev 5:745–757.
Sorenson JR, Scotch NA, Swazey JP, Wertz DC, Heeren TC (1987) Reproductive plans of genetic counseling clients not eligible for prenatal diagnosis.Am J Med Genet 28:345–352.
Swerts A (1987) Impact of genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome and neural tube defects. In: Evers-Kiebooms G, Cassiman JJ, Van den Berghe H, d'Ydewalle G (eds)Genetic Risk, Risk Perception and Decision Making. BD:OAS, XXIII(2):61–83.
Wertz DC, Fletcher JC (1988) Attitudes of genetic counselors: A multinational survey.Am J Hum Genet 42:592–600.
Wertz DC, Sorenson JR, Heeren TC (1984) Genetic counseling and reproductive uncertainty.Am J Med Genet 18:79–88.
Wertz DC, Sorenson JR, Heeren TC (1988) Communication in health professional-lay encounters: How often does each party know what the other wants to discuss. In: Ruben BD (ed)Information and Behavior, Vol 2. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, pp 329–342.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kessler, S. Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. VII. Thoughts on directiveness. J Genet Counsel 1, 9–17 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960080
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960080