Skip to main content
Log in

Normative values on the marks and mathews fear questionnaire: A comparison as a function of age and sex

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the Marks and Mathews Fear Questionnaire (1979) has gained widespread use, little information on its psychometric characteristics has been reported. Thus, one purpose of this investigation was to provide normative information on this device. A second purpose was to examine differences in reported fears as a function of age and sex. Fear Questionnaires were administered to a large sample of high-school students, college students, and adults. Means and standard deviations on the Fear Questionnaire are reported for the various groups. Significant differences were found between groups, with college and high-school women reporting more fears than corresponding men, college and high-school women reporting more fears than adult women, and college men showing a trend toward more fears than other men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrios, B. A., Hartmann, D., & Shigetomi, C. (1981). Fears and anxieties in children. In E. Mash and L. Terdal (Eds.),Behavioral assessment of childhood disorders. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmer, S. G., & Swanson, M. R. (1973). An evaluation often pairwise comparison procedures using Monte Carlo methods.Journal of the American Statistical Association.68, 66–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallam, R. S., & Hafner, R. J. (1978). Fears of phobic patients: Factor analyses of self-report data.Behaviour Research & Therapy, 16, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, G. (1973).Design and analysis: A researchers handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ; Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, I. M., & Mathews, A. M. (1979). Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients.Behaviour Research & Therapy, 17, 263–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, L., & Mavissakalian, M. (1983). Temporal stability of self-report measures in agoraphobia research.Behaviour Research & Therapy, 21, 695–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizes, J. S., Landolf-Fritche, B., & Grossman-McKee, D. (in press). Patterns of distorted cognition in phobic disorders: Investigation of clinically severe simple, social, and agoraphobics.Cognitive Therapy and Research.

  • North Dakota State Board of Higher Education (NDSBHE). (1984).Funding North Dakota Higher Education. Bismarck, ND: NDSBHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpe, J., & Lang, P. J. (1964). A fear survey schedule for use in behavior therapy.Behaviour Research & Therapy, 2, 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mizes, J.S., Crawford, J. Normative values on the marks and mathews fear questionnaire: A comparison as a function of age and sex. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 8, 253–262 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00959836

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00959836

Key words

Navigation