Abstract
Some isogenic strains produced from a natural population at El Prat (Barcelona) were tested at different temperatures for total viability. Their hybrids were also tested at the same temperatures for the same trait. Hybrids proved to be more homcostatic than their isogenic parental strains. More efficient homeostasis in hybrids is suggested to be the cause of increased hybrid superiority with decreasing temperature.
Genotype-temperature interaction was always significant for isogenic strains, but never for hybrids. These results are discussed in terms of coadaptation and homeostasis. Some maternal effects have also been detected.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dobzhansky Th. & H. Levene (1955). Genetics of natural populations. XXIV. Developmental homeostasis in natural populations ofDrosophila pseudoobscura.Genetics 40: 797–808.
Lerner I. M. (1954). Genetic Homeostasis. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.
Parsons P. A. (1959). Genotypic-environmental interactions for various temperatures inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics 44: 1325–1333.
Pavlovsky O. & Th. Dobzhansky (1966). Genetics of natural populations. XXXVII. The coadapted system of chromosomal variants in a population ofDrosophila pseudoobscura.Genetics 53: 843–854.
Robertson F. W. & E. C. R. Reeve (1952). Heterozigosity, environmental variation and heterosis.Nature 170: 296.
Spiess E. B. (1968). Experimental population genetics. Annual Review of Genetics. Vol. 2: 165–208.
Valen L.van (1963). Supposedly high viabilities of homozygotes inDrosophila.Genetics 48: 387–390.
Vetukhiv M. (1953). Viability of hybrids between local populations ofDrosophila pseudoobscura.Proc. National Ac. Sci. 39: 30–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fontdevila, A. Genotype-temperature interaction inDrosophila melanogaster. I. Viability. Genetica 41, 257–264 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00958910
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00958910