Skip to main content
Log in

Classroom applications of stimulus equivalence technology

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We review basic concepts and methods of stimulus equivalence research and suggest applications in teaching rudimentary language arts skills in the classroom. We describe methods of establishing equivalence-based networks of matching-to-sample, writing, and naming performances. The methods may be used as a supplement to classroom instruction to assess whether standard curriculum-based approaches establish such integrated networks. Methods derived from equivalence research may be useful for remediation when traditional teaching approaches fail. Recent research suggests that direct focus on spelling performances may be required if entire networks of language arts skills are to be acquired. In addition, the equivalence relations themselves may require concentrated teaching in some children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Book Company. (1980).American readers: Finding places (Teacher's Edition). New York: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, C. (1971). Write first; read later.Child Education.47, 296–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. C. Heath and Company. (1991).Heath reading: Preprimer 1 (Teacher's Edition). Lexington, MA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devany, J. M., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dube, W. V., McDonald, S. J., McIlvane, W. J., & Mackay, H. A. (1991). Constructed response matching to sample and spelling instruction.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 305–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dube, W. V., & McIlvane, W. J. (1989). Adapting a microcomputer for behavioral evaluation of mentally retarded individuals. In J. A. Mulick & R. F. Antonak (Eds.),Transitions in mental retardation (Vol 4, pp. 104–127). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.),Handbook of reading research, Volume II (pp. 383–417). White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1987). Does learning to spell help beginners learn to read words?Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.),Surface dyslexia (pp. 301–330). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B. (1984). Word recognition. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.),Handbook of reading research (pp. 225–253). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (1983). Effective spelling instruction.Elementary School Journal, 83, 560 567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Voth, V. P. (1990). Spelling instruction: Making modifications for students with learning disabilities.Academic Therapy, 25, 447–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, G. (1990). Differences in development of visual and auditory-visual equivalence relations.American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 260–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guess, D., & Baer, D. M. (1973). An analysis of individual differences in generalization between receptive and productive language in retarded children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 311–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heron, T. E., Okyere, B. A., & Miller, A. D. (1991). A taxonomy of approaches to teach spelling.Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinney, P. G., Stevens, K. B., & Schuster, J. W. (1988). The effects of CAI and time delay: A systematic program for teaching spelling.Journal of Special Education Technology, 9, 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, R. M., Davis-Lang, D., & Sanchez, L. (1984). The formation of stimulus equivalences in children.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. L. (1981). Prepositional phrases spoken and heard.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 35, 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. L., & Pegler, A. M. (1982). Effects on spelling of training children to read.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. L., & Sanderson, G. M. (1987). Some contingencies of spelling.Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, H, A. (1991). Stimulus equivalence: Implications for the development of adaptive behavior. In R. Remington (Ed.),The challenge of severe mental handicap: An applied behaviour analytic approach, (pp. 235–259) London, England: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, H. A. (1985). Stimulus equivalence in rudimentary reading and spelling.Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 373–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, H. A., & Sidman, M. (1984). Teaching new behavior via equivalence relations. In P. H. Brooks, R. Sperber, & C. MacCauley (Eds.),Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 493–513). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. G., & Gatch, M. B. (1989). Stimulus equivalence and receptive reading by hearing-impaired preschool children.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 20, 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remington, B., & Clark, S. (1983). Acquisition of expressive signing by autistic children: An evaluation of the relative effect of simultaneous communication and sign-alone training.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.),Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M., & Cresson, O., Jr. (1973). Reading and crossmodal transfer of stimulus equivalences in severe retardation.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 515–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M., Kirk, B., & Willson-Morris, M. (1985). Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M., Willson-Morris, M., & Kirk, B. (1986). Matching-to-sample procedures and the development of equivalence relations.Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradlin, J. E., Cotter, V. W., & Baxley, N. (1973). Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: A study of transfer with retarded adolescents.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 556–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, K. B., Blackhurst, A. E., & Slaton, D. B. (1991). Teaching memorized spelling with a microcomputer: Time delay and computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromer, R. (1991). Stimulus equivalence: Implications for teaching. In W. Ishaq (Ed.),Human behavior in today's world (pp. 109–122). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromer, R., & Mackay, H. A. (1990). Arbitrary stimulus relations and delayed identity matching to complex samples.Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 8, 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromer, R., & Mackay, H. A. (in press). Delayed constructed-response identity matching improves the spelling performances of students with mental retardation.Journal of Behavioral Education.

  • Stromer, R., & Mackay, H. A. (in press). Spelling and emergent picture-printed word relations established with delayed identity matching to complex samples.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.

  • Stromer, R., & Mackay, H. A. (in press). Delayed identity matching to complex samples: Teaching students with mental retardation spelling and the prerequisites for equivalence classes.Research in Developmental Disabilities.

  • Stromer, R., & Osborne, J. G. (1982). Control of adolescent's arbitrary matching-to-sample by positive and negative stimulus relations.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 329–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, R. J.. & Shanahan, T. (1991). Research on the reading-writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.),Handbook of reading research, Volume II (pp. 246–280). White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanBiervliet, A. (1977). Establishing words and objects as functionally equivalent through manual sign training.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 82, 178–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulz, S. V., & Hollis, J. H. (1979). Application of manual signing to the development of reading skills. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & J. H. Hollis (Eds.),Language intervention from ape to child (pp. 465–489). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stromer, R., Mackay, H.A. & Stoddard, L.T. Classroom applications of stimulus equivalence technology. J Behav Educ 2, 225–256 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00948817

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00948817

Key words

Navigation