Skip to main content
Log in

Change schools through revolution, not evolution

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The school's traditional practices are linked to current failures and to the limited prospects of future success. The major problems with current school practices are: adopting instructional programs that have never been fieldtested and revised on the basis of data; using diagnostic practices that “blame” the child as being the sole cause of poor performance; using testing techniques that do not imply curricular remedies; promoting children beyond their grade-level performance; failing to provide teachers with effective training and monitoring. Recommendations for changing the system to become accountable and databased include: bringing pressure from outside the system; lobbying for alternatives to public schools; promoting intervention by the board; involving parents in union negotiations; establishing committees of expert teachers to review administrative proposals and report to the board. The central feature of the plan is to fire administrators who fail to meet attainable student-achievement goals. This practice would ensure that administrators are reinforced when children succeed, a feature that is not part of current practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessi, G. (1988). Diagnosis diagnosed: A systemic reaction.Professional School Psychology, 3, 145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. J. (1990). Mathematical power to the people.Harvard Educational Review, 60, 357–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, G. (1978). The learning disabilities test battery: Empirical and social issues.Harvard Educational Review, 48, 313–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of English, Commission on Reading (1987, November).Report card on basal readers. Paper presented at the NCTE Invitational Conference on the Basal Reader, Los Angeles.

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989).Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Research Advisory Committee (1988). NCTM curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics: Responses from the research community.Journal for Research In Mathematics Education, 19, 338–344.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engelmann, S. Change schools through revolution, not evolution. J Behav Educ 1, 295–304 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00947184

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00947184

Key words

Navigation