Skip to main content
Log in

Anonymity reconsidered

  • Published:
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper questions the concept of the therapist's anonymity and offers as an alternative the concept of an anonymity/self-disclosure dimension along which the therapist can position himself depending on several criteria. These criteria pertain both to characteristics of the therapist, the patient, and the material to be disclosed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, E.The denial of death. New York: The Free Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, B., & Whitehorn J. 1956. The relationship of the therapist to the outcome of therapy in schizophrenia.Psychiatric Research Reports, 1956,5, 89–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanck, G., Blanck, R.Ego psychology II. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, L. B. & Giovacchini P.Psychoanalytic treatment of schizophrenia and characterological disorders. New York: Science House, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S.The dynamics of transference (Standard edition, Vol. 12). London: Hogarth Press, 1964. (a) (Originally published, 1912.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S.Recommendations to physicians practicing psychoanalysis (Standard Edition, Vol. 12). London: Hogarth Press, 1964.(b) (Originally published, 1912.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. On Beginning the treatment (Standard Edition, Vol. 12) London: Hogarth Press, 1964. (Originally published, 1913.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, R. F.Principles of intensive psychotherapy. Chicago: the University of Chicago Press, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenson R.The technique and practice of psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubie, L.Practical and theoretical aspects of psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langs, R.The bipersonal field. New York: Jason Aronson, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langs, R.The listening process. New York: Jason Aronson, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, E.The fallacy of understanding. New York: Basic Books, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, H. Identity and sexuality.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1961,9: 179–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Racker, H.Transference and countertransference. New York: International Universities Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roazen, P.Freud and his followers. New York, London: New American Library, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searles, H. The schizophrenic's vulnerability to the therapist's unconscious process. InCollected papers on schizophrenic and related subjects. New York: International Universities Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glazer, M. Anonymity reconsidered. J Contemp Psychother 12, 146–153 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00946190

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00946190

Keywords

Navigation