Skip to main content
Log in

Robustness of perturbation analysis estimators for queueing systems with unknown distributions

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sample-path-based stochastic gradient estimators for performance measures of queueing systems rely on the assumption that a probability distribution of the random vector of interest (e.g., a service or interarrival time sequence) is given. In this paper, we address the issue of dealing with unknown probability distributions and investigate the robustness of such estimators with respect to possibly erroneous distribution choices. We show that infinitesimal perturbation analysis (IPA) can be robust in this sense and, in some cases, provides distribution-independent estimates. Comparisons with other gradient estimators are provided, including experimental results. We also show that finite perturbation analysis (FPA), though only providing gradient approximations, possesses some attractive robustness properties with respect to unknown distribution parameters. An application of FPA estimation is included for a queueing system performance optimization problem involving customers with real-time constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robbins, H., andMonro, S.,A Stochastic Approximation Method, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 22, pp. 400–407, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rubinstein, R. V.,Monte Carlo Optimization, Simulation, and Sensitivity Analysis of Queueing Networks, Wiley, New York, New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ho, Y. C.,Performance Evaluation and Perturbation Analysis of Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-32, pp. 563–572, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Suri, R.,Perturbation Analysis: The State of the Art and Research Issues Explained via the GI/G/1 Queue, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 77, pp. 114–137, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heidelberger, P., andTowsley, D.,Sensitivity Analysis from Sample Paths Using Likelihoods, Management Science, Vol. 35, pp. 1475–1488, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reiman, M. I., andWeiss, A.,Sensitivity Analysis for Simulations via Likelihood Ratios, Operations Research, Vol. 37, pp. 830–844, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cao, X.,Convergence of Parameter Sensitivity Estimates in a Stochastic Experiment, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-30, pp. 834–843, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gong, W. B., andHo, Y. C.,Smoothed Perturbation Analysis of Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-32, pp. 858–866, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ho, Y. C., andLi, S.,Extensions of the Perturbation Analysis Techniques for Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-33, pp. 427–438, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ho, Y. C., Cao, X., andCassandras, C. G.,Infinitesimal and Finite Perturbation Analysis for Queueing Networks, Automatica, Vol. 19, pp. 439–445, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cassandras, C. G., andLee, J. I.,Applications of Perturbation Techniques to Optimal Resource Sharing in Discrete Event Systems, Proceedings of the 1988 American Control Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, Vol. 1, pp. 450–455, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gallager, R. G.,A Minimum Delay Routing Algorithm Using Distributed Computation, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. COM-25, pp. 73–85, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tantawi, A., andTowsley, D.,Optimal Static Load Balancing in Distributed Computer Systems, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, Vol. 32, pp. 445–465, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Suri, R.,Infinitesimal Perturbation Analysis for General Discrete Event Systems, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, Vol. 34, pp. 686–717, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Suri, R., andZazanis, M.,Perturbation Analysis Gives Strongly Consistent Sensitivity Estimates for the M/G/1 Queue, Management Science, Vol. 34, pp. 39–64, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cassandras, C. G., andStrickland, S. G.,Perturbation Analytic Methodologies for Design and Optimization of Communication Networks, IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 6, pp. 158–171, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kleinrock, L.,Queueing Systems, Vol. 1: Theory, Wiley, New York, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kurose, J. F., andChipalkatti, R.,Load Sharing in Soft Real-Time Distributed Computer Systems, IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol. C-36, pp. 993–1000, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Holtzman, J. M.,On Using Perturbation Analysis to Do Sensitivity Analysis, Proceedings of the 28th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Tampa, Florida, Vol. 3, pp. 2018–2023, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by Y. C. Ho

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation Grant ECS-88-01912 and by the Office of Naval Research Contract N00014-87-K-0304.

The authors wish to thank Dr. Jack Holtzman for several useful comments and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cassandras, C.G., Gong, W.B. & Lee, J.I. Robustness of perturbation analysis estimators for queueing systems with unknown distributions. J Optim Theory Appl 70, 491–519 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00941299

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00941299

Key Words

Navigation