Skip to main content
Log in

Circumscription of the tribeCinchoneae (Rubiaceae)—a cladistic approach

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Circumscription of the tribeCinchoneae (Rubiaceae) is reconsidered on the basis of a cladistic analysis of structural data comprising 48 characters (164 states). It is concluded that the tribeCinchoneae, in order to be monophyletic, should be restricted to compriseCapirona, Cephalodendron, Cinchona, Cosmibuena, Dolicholobium, Ferdinandusa, Joosia, Ladenbergia, Macrocnemum, andRemijia. It is also suspected, on insufficient evidence, thatMaguireocharis, Pimentelia, andStilpnophyllum belong here.Alseis, Calycophyllum, Schizocalyx, andWittmackanthus form a monophyletic group possibly related to theCinchoneae. A new tribe,Calycophylleae, is proposed to accommodate them.Hillia, which is possibly the sister group of theCinchoneae, is retained in a separate tribe.Coptosapelta, Corynanthe, Crossopteryx, Hymenodictyon, Luculia, Mitragyna, Mussaendopsis, Paracorynanthe, Pausinystalia, andUncaria are referred to the same tribe, for which the nameCoptosapelteae has to be adopted. Probably alsoGreeniopsis belongs here. The generaCigarilla, Coutarea, andExostema, and possiblySyringantha andWernhamia, seem to be most closely related toPortlandia and should be transferred to the tribeCondamineeae. Bouvardia, Coursiana, Danais, Duidiana, Dunnia, Heterophyllaea, Hindsia, Lecanosperma, Manettia, Merumea, Neohymenopogon, andSchismatoclada should be provisionally transferred to the tribeHedyotideae, which is suspected to be polyphyletic, however. No conclusive results were reached concerning the position ofBalmea, Blepharidium, Emmenopterys, andSuberanthus, the position of them remaining uncertain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiello, A., 1979: A reexamination ofPortlandia (Rubiaceae) and associated taxa. — J. Arnold Arbor.60: 38–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archie, J. W., 1989: Homoplasy excess ratios: new indices for measuring levels of homoplasy in phylogenetic systematics and a critique of the consistency index. — Syst. Zool.38: 253–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, G., Hooker, J. D., 1873(–1876): Genera plantarum, etc. II. — London: Reeve & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, W. H., 1968: Revision ofBouvardia. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.55: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boom, B. M., 1984: A revision ofIsertia (Isertieae: Rubiaceae). — Brittonia36: 425–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borhidi, A., 1982: Studies inRondeletieae (Rubiaceae) III. The generaRogiera andArachnothryx. — Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung.28: 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981a: Studies inRondeletieae (Rubiaceae) I. A new genus:Roigella. — Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung.27: 309–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —, 1981b: Studies inRondeletieae (Rubiaceae) II. A new genus:Suberanthus. — Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung.27: 313–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —, 1983: Studies inRondeletieae (Rubiaceae), V. Los límites del géneroSuberanthus. — Acta Bot. Hung.29: 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1983: Studies inRondeletieae (Rubiaceae), IV. A new genus:Javorkaea. — Acta Bot. Hung.29: 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremekamp, C. E. B., 1952: The African species ofOldenlandia L. sensuHiern. etK. Schumann. — Verh. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet., Afd. Nat., Ser. 2,18: 1–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1966: Remarks on the position, the delimitation and subdivision of theRubiaceae. — Acta Bot. Neerl.15: 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, B., 1987: The sister group of the paleotropical tribeArgostemmateae: a redefined neotropical tribeHamelieae (Rubiaceae, Rubioideae). — Cladistics3: 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991: Comparative restriction site mapping of chloroplast DNA implies new phylogenetic relationships withinRubiaceae. — Amer. J. Bot.78: 198–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridson, D., Verdcourt, B., 1988:Rubiaceae (Part 2). — InPolhill, R. M., (Ed.): Flora of Tropical East Africa. — Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candolle, A. P. de, 1807: Memoire sur leCuviera, genre noveau de la famille des Rubiacées. — Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. (Paris)9: 216–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1830: Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, etc. IV. — Paris: Truettel & Würtz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capuron, R., Leroy, J. F., 1978:Paracorynanthe, genre noveau de Rubiacées-Cinchonées malgache. — Adansonia, ser. 2,18: 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1981: An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988: The evolution and classification of flowering plants. 2nd edn. — Bronx, N. Y.: New York Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, S. P., 1976: The subfamilial, tribal and subtribal nomenclature of theRubiaceae. — Taxon25: 595–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, J. D., 1980: Flora of Panama. Part IX. Family 179.Rubiaceae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.67: 1–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrendorfer, F., 1988: Affinities of the African dendroflora: suggestions from karyo-and chemosystematics. — Monogr. Missouri Bot. Gard.25: 105–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, T. S., 1976: A monograph of the genusHamelia (Rubiaceae). — Mem. New York Bot. Gard.26(4): 81–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdtman, G., 1943: An introduction to pollen analysis. — Waltham, Mass.: Chronica Botanica.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1952: Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. Angiosperms. — Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallé, N., 1966: Famille des Rubiacées (le partie). — InAubréville, A., (Ed.): Flore du Gabon 12. — Paris: Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1970: Famille des Rubiacées (2e partie). — InAubréville, A., Leroy, J. F., (Eds.): Flore du Gabon. 17. — Paris: Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homolle, A. M., 1942: Notes sur quelques plantes rares et mal representées de la tribu des Cinchonées (Rubiacées). — Bull. Soc. Bot. France89: 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren, P. K., Keuken, W., Schofield, E. K., 1981: Index Herbariorum I. The herbaria of the world. 7th edn. — Regnum Veg.106: 1–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, J. D., 1876:Stilpnophyllum lineatum,Hook. F. — Hooker's Icon. Pl. pl. 1147.

  • Kirkbride, J. H., Jr., 1985 (1986): ManipulusRubiacearum V. A revision of the genusCapirona. — Acta Amazonica15: 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koek-Noorman, J., 1969a: A contribution to the wood anatomy of South American (chiefly Suriname)Rubiaceae. I. — Acta Bot. Neerl.18: 108–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1969b: A contribution to the wood anatomy of South American (chiefly Suriname)Rubiaceae II. — Acta Bot. Neerl.18: 377–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1970: A contribution to the wood anatomy of theCinchoneae, Coptosapelteae, andNaucleeae (Rubiaceae). — Acat Bot. Neerl.19: 154–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1972: The wood anatomy ofGardenieae, Ixoreae andMussaendeae (Rubiaceae). — Acta Bot. Neerl.21: 301–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1974: The wood anatomy ofVanguerieae, Cinchoneae, Condamineeae andRondeletieae (Rubiaceae). — Acta Bot. Neerl.23: 627–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, K., 1915:Rubiaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds.): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Ergänzungsheft III (pp. 290–301). — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwenberg, A. J. M., & al., 1980:Loganiaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds.): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 28b(I): 1–255. — Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S., 1922:Wernhamia. — InHerzog, T., (Ed.): Die von Dr.Th. Herzog auf seiner zweiten Reise durch Bolivien in den Jahren 1910 und 1911 gesammelten Pflanzen. — Medel. Rijks Herb. Leiden46: 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naithani, H. B., Bennet, S. S. R., 1981: Interesting distributional records of seven species of flowering plants from Arunchal Pradesh. — Indian J. Forestry4(2): 160–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, D., 1889:Emmenopterys henryi,Oliv. —Hooker's Icon. Pl.29: pl. 1823.

  • Ridsdale, C. E., 1975: A synopsis of the African and MadagascanRubiaceae-Naucleeae. — Blumea22: 541–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1976: A revision of the tribeCephalantheae (Rubiaceae). — Blumea23: 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978: A revision ofMitragyna andUncaria. — Blumea24: 43–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbrecht, E., 1988: Tropical woodyRubiaceae. — Opera Bot. Belgica1: 1–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1986: A survey of theGardenieae and related tribes (Rubiaceae). — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.108(1): 63–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, G. K., 1984:Gleasonia, Henriquezia andPlatycarpum (Rubiaceae). — Flora Neotropica39: 1–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1987: The genera ofCinchonoideae in the south eastern United States. — J. Arnold Arbor.68: 137–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandwith, N. Y., 1949: Contributions to the flora of tropical America: XLIX. Notes onRubiaceae. — Kew Bull. 1949: 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, K., 1889:Rubiaceae. — InMartius, C. F. P. von, Eichler, A. G., Urban, I., (Eds.): Flora Brasiliensis 6(6). — Leipzig: Fleischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1891:Rubiaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds.): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 4(4): 1–156. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1897:Rubiaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds.): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Nachträge zum II.–IV. Teil (pp. 309–316). — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. C., Darwin, S. P., 1988:Rubiaceae. — InSmith, A. C., (Ed.): Flora vitiensis nova. A new flora of Fiji4, pp. 143–376. — Lawai, Hawaii: Pacific Tropical Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standley, P. C., 1911:Blepharidium, a new genus ofRubiaceae from Guatemala. — J. Wash. Acad. Sci.8: 58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1918:Rubiaceae. — N. Amer. Fl.32(1).

  • —, 1930: Studies of American plants — IV. — Publ. Field Mus., Bot.8: 131–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1975:Rubiaceae. Flora of Guatemala, part XI, nos. 1–3. — Publ. Field Mus., Bot.24(9): 1–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyermark, J. A., 1967:Rubiaceae. — InMaguire, B., Wurdack, J. J., (Eds.): Botany of the Guayana Highlands — Part VII. — Mem. New York Bot. Gard.17: 178–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1972:Rubiaceae. — InSteyermark J. A., Maguire, B. & al., (Eds.): Botany of the Guayana Highlands — Part IX. — Mem. New York Bot. Gard.23: 227–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1974:Rubiaceae. — InLasser, T., Steyermark, J. A., (Eds.): Flora de Venezuela9. — Caracas: Instituto Botánico.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1975: Revision of the genusJoosia (Rubiaceae). — Brittonia27: 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Kirkbride, J. H., Jr., 1975: The genusWittmackanthus (Rubiaceae). — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62: 504–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L., 1989: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.0f. — Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A. L., 1980: Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). — Bot. Rev.46: 225–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. M., 1989: Revision ofHillia subg.Ravnia (Rubiaceae: Cinchonoideae). — Selbyana11: 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdcourt, B., 1958: Remarks on the classification of theRubiaceae. — Bull. Rijksplantentuin Bruss.28: 209–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1976:Rubiaceae (part 1). — InPolhill, R. M., (Ed.): Flora of Tropical East Africa. — London: Agents for Overseas Governments and Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weddell, H.-A., 1849: Histoire naturelle des Quinquinas ou monographie du genreCinchona, etc. — Paris: Victor Masson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersson, L., Persson, C. Circumscription of the tribeCinchoneae (Rubiaceae)—a cladistic approach. Pl Syst Evol 178, 65–94 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937983

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937983

Key words

Navigation