Skip to main content
Log in

Gene lineage analysis in populations ofHelianthus niveus andH. petiolaris (Asteraceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Helianthus petiolaris andH. niveus are polytypic species which are morphologically distinct at the periphery of their ranges but intergrade in areas of sympatry.Helianthus niveus includes both annual and perennial members, whereasH. petiolaris is strictly annual. Chloroplast DNA and nuclear ribosomal DNA restriction site data were used to reconstruct the evolutionary history of populations of the two species. Cladistic analyses reveal the following: (1) neither species is monophyletic; (2) the annual habit is derived once in this complex; and (3) the region of morphological intergradation appears to be primary in origin. The significance of interbreeding versus common descent in defining species concepts is discussed in relation to the above cladistic analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avise, J., 1989: Gene trees and organismal histories: a phylogenetic approach to population biology. — Evolution43: 1192–1208.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Shapira, J., Daniel, S., Aquadro, C., Lansman, R., 1983: Mitochondrial DNA differentiation during the speciation process inPeromyscus. — Molec. Biol. Evol.1: 30–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J., Jan, C., Beard, B., 1986: Chromosomal differentiation among the annualHelianthus species. — Syst. Bot.11: 354–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J., 1983: Species concepts and speciation analysis. — Curr. Ornith.1: 159–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1989: Speciation and its ontology: the empirical consequences of alternative species concepts for understanding patterns and processes of differentiation. — InOtte, D., Endler, J., (Eds.): Speciation and its consequences, pp. 28–59. — Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debry, R., Slade, N., 1985: Cladistic analysis of restriction endonuclease cleavage maps within a maximum-likelihood framework. — Syst. Zool.34: 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Queiroz, K., Donoghue, M., 1988: Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. — Cladistics4: 317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley, J., 1989: Molecular evidence for a missing wild relative of maize and the introgression of its chloroplast genome intoZea perennis. — Evolution43: 1555–1558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, M., 1985: A critique of the biological species concepts and recommendations for a phylogenetic alternative. — Bryologist88: 172–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. J., Doyle, J. L., 1987: A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small amounts of fresh leaf tissue. — Phytochem. Bull.19: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1979: Alternative methods of phylogenetic inference and their interrelationship. — Syst. Zool.28: 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M., 1987: Species concepts, individuality, and objectivity. — Biol. Phil.2: 127–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, C., 1987: The debate about the biological species concepts—a review. — Z. Zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch.25: 241–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, C., 1961: Morphological and cytological variation inHelianthus petiolaris with notes on related species. — Evolution15: 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1973: Introgression re-examined. — Bot. Rev.39: 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Smith, D., Clevenger, S., Martin, W., 1969: The north american sunflowers (Helianthus). — Mem. Torrey Bot. Club22: 1–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D., 1979: The nature of plant species. — Science204: 381–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidén, M., Oxelman, B., 1989: Species—pattern or process? — Taxon38: 228–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, B., Brandon, R., 1987: Individuality, pluralism, and the phylogenetic species concept. — Biol. Phil.2: 397–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Budd, A., 1990: Species and evolution in clonal organisms—introduction. — Syst. Bot.15: 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Donoghue, M., 1982: Species concepts: a case for pluralism. — Syst. Zool.31: 491–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., 1972: Genetic diversity and natural selection. — Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., Li, W., 1979: Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.76: 5269–5273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G., 1989: Cladistics and evolutionary models. — Cladistics5: 275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J., 1986: Isolation and structural analysis of chloroplast DNA. — InWeissbach, A., Weissbach, H., (Eds.): Method in enzymology, pp. 167–186. — New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, H., 1985: The recognition concept of species. — InVrba, E., (Ed.): Species and speciation, pp. 21–29. — Pretoria: Transvaal Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M., 1989: The cladistic solution to the species problem. — Biol. Phil.4: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg, L., Soltis, D., Palmer, J., 1988: A molecular re-examination of introgression betweenHelianthus annuus andH. bolanderi (Compositae). — Evolution42: 227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Beckstrom-Sternberg, S., Doan, K., 1990:Helianthus annuus subsp.texanus has chloroplast DNA and nuclear ribosomal RNA genes ofHelianthus debilis subsp.cucumerifolius. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.87: 593–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • - -Liston, A., Arias, D., 1991: Phylogenetic and systematic inferences from chloroplast DNA and isozyme variation inHelianthus sectionHelianthus (Asteraceae). — Syst. Bot. (in press).

  • Schilling, E., Heiser, C., 1981: Infrageneric classification ofHelianthus (Compositae). — Taxon30: 393–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D., Soltis, P., Milligan, B., 1990: Intraspecific chloroplast DNA variation. — InSoltis, D., Soltis, P., Doyle, J., (Eds.): Plant molecular systematics. — New York: Chapman & Hall (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A., 1981: Mechanisms of speciation. — A population genetic approach. — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.12: 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1989: The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective. — InOtte, D., Endler, J., (Eds.): Speciation and its consequences, pp. 3–27. — Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen, L., 1982: Integration of species: stasis and biogeography. — Evol. Theory6: 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Q., Nixon, K., 1990: Another way of looking at the species problem: a reply tode Queiroz andDonoghue. — Cladistics6: 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M., 1978: Modes of speciation. — San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, P., Soltis, D., Soltis, P., 1990: Chloroplast-DNA and allozymic variation in diploid and autotetraploidHeuchera grossulariifolia (Saxifragaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.77: 232–244.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beckstrom-Sternberg, S.M., Rieseberg, L.H. & Doan, K. Gene lineage analysis in populations ofHelianthus niveus andH. petiolaris (Asteraceae). Pl Syst Evol 175, 125–138 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937842

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937842

Key words

Navigation