Skip to main content
Log in

Chemosystematics of theRutaceae: Comments on the interpretation ofda Silva & al.

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The revision of theRutaceae into 17 provisional tribes, based primarily on the distribution of secondary metabolites (da Silva & al. 1988) is critically reviewed. In three areas where sufficient phytochemical data is available, i.e. the “proto-Rutaceae”, (provisional tribesZanthoxylum, Phellodendron, Toddalia, andEuodia pro parte), the AfricanToddalioideae sensuEngler, (provisional tribesEuodia pro parte,Acronychia), andClauseneae sensuSwingle, (provisional tribesClausena, Glycosmis, Micromelum, Merrillia), it is shown that the proposals made byda Silva & al. are seriously flawed. It is suggested that for other areas of the family insufficient phytochemical information is available to justify these proposals. In a wider context it is suggested that this approach, based on only one set of characters and on a wholly insufficient data base, is unhelpful to the task of producing a new classification of the family.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • But, P. P.-H., Kong, Y.-C., Li, Q., Chang, H.-T., Chang, K.-L., Wong, K. M., Gray, A. I., Waterman, P. G., 1988: Chemotaxonomic relationship betweenMurraya andMerrillia (Rutaceae). — Acta Phytotax. Sin.26: 205–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • da Silva M. F. das Graças Fernandes, Gottlieb, O. R., Ehrendorfer, F., 1988: Chemosystematics of theRutaceae: suggestions for a more natural taxonomy and evolutionary interpretation of the family. — Pl. Syst. Evol.161: 97–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagne, E., Yenesew, A., Waterman, P. G., Gray, A. I., 1988: The chemical systematics of theRutaceae, subfamilyToddalioideae, in Africa. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.16: 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A., 1896:Rutaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds.): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien III4: 95–201. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1931:Rutaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds.): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn. 19a: 187–459. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, F., Waterman, P. G., 1973: The chemosystematics of theZanthoxylum/Fagara complex. — Taxon22: 177–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, O. R., 1982: Micromolecular evolution, systematics and ecology. An essay into a novel botanical discipline. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A. I., 1983: Structural diversity and distribution of coumarins and chromones in theRutales. — InWaterman, P. G., Grundon, M. F., (Eds.): Chemistry and chemical taxonomy of theRutales, pp. 97–146. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978: Coumarins of theRutaceae. — Phytochemistry17: 845–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, T. G., 1974: A revision of the genusAcronychia (Rutaceae). — J. Arnold Arbor.55: 469–523, 525–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981: A revision of the genusTetradium (Rutaceae). — Gard. Bull. Singapore23: 91–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1982: A revision of the genusSarcomelicope (Rutaceae). — Austral. J. Bot.30: 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R., 1963: The taxonomic significance of alkaloids. — InSwain, T., (Ed.): Chemical plant taxonomy, pp. 389–427. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, Y.-C., Cheng, K.-F., Ng, K.-M., But, P. P.-H., Li, Q., Yu, S.-X., Chang, H.-T., Cambie, R. C., Kinoshita, T., Kan, W.-S., Waterman, P. G., 1986a: A chemotaxonomic division ofMurraya based on the distribution of the alkaloids yuehchukene and girinimbine. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.14: 491–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1986b: Sources of the anti-implantation alkaloid yuehchukene in the genusMurraya. — J. Ethnopharmacol.15: 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988a: The biochemical systematics ofMerrillia; in relation toMurraya, theClauseneae andAurantioideae. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.16: 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —, —, —,Waterman, P. G., 1988b:Micromelum: a key genus in the chemosystematics of theClauseneae. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.16: 485–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., Zhu, L.-F., But, P. P.-H., Kong, Y.-C., Chang, H.-T., Waterman, P. G., 1988: Monoterpene and sesquiterpene rich oils from the leaves ofMurraya species: chemotaxonomic significance. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.16: 491–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, G.-Y., Gray, A. I., Waterman, P. G., 1988: Tirucallane and oleanane triterpenes from the resin ofAucoumea klaineana. — Phytochemistry27: 2283–2286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lontsi, D., Ayafor, J. F., Sondengam, B. L., Connolly, J. D., Rycroft, D. S., 1985: The use of two-dimensional long-range δCH correlation in conjunction with the onedimensional proton-coupled13C NMR spectrum in the structure elucidation of ekeberginine, a new carbazole alkaloid fromEkebergia senegalensis (Meliaceae). — Tetrahedron Lett.26: 4249–4252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mester, I., 1983: Structural diversity and distribution of alkaloids in theRutales. — InWaterman, P. G., Grundon, M. F., (Eds.): Chemistry and chemical taxonomy of theRutales, pp. 31–96. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K. M., But, P. P.-H., Gray, A. I., Hartley, T. G., Kong, Y.-C., Waterman, P. G., 1987: The biochemical systematics ofTetradium, Euodia, andMelicope and their significance in theRutaceae. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.15: 587–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quader, M. A., But, P. P.-H., Gray, A. I., Hartley, T. G., Kong, Y.-C., Waterman, P. G., 1990: The biochemical systematics ofTetradium trichotomum. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol. (in press).

  • Razdan, T. K., Qadri, B., Harkar, S., Waight, E. S., 1987: Chromones and coumarins fromSkimmia laureola. — Phytochemistry26: 2063–2069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swingle, W. T., 1938: A new taxonomic arrangement of the orange family,Aurantioideae. — J. Washington Acad. Sci.28: 530–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, T., 1929:Chalcas, aLinnean genus which includes many new types of Asiatic plants. — J. Sci. Trop. Agric.1: 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, P. G., 1975: Alkaloids of theRutaceae: their distribution and systematic significance. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.3: 149–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1983: Phylogenetic implications of the distribution of secondary metabolites within theRutales. — InWaterman, P. G., Grundon, M. F., (Eds.): Chemistry and chemical taxonomy of theRutales, pp. 377–400. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, (Eds.), 1983: Chemistry and chemical taxonomy of theRutales. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981: The biochemical systematics ofFagaropsis angolensis and its significance in theRutales. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.9: 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waterman, P.G. Chemosystematics of theRutaceae: Comments on the interpretation ofda Silva & al.. Pl Syst Evol 173, 39–48 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937761

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937761

Key words

Navigation