Skip to main content
Log in

The ecogeographical differentiation of Amazonian inundation forests

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the considerable annual fluctuations of water level of the Amazonian rivers, their river banks are fringed with periodically flooded forests of vast extension. The biota of these communities are adapted to annual inundations that can last for more than half a year. Water chemistry is most important for the floristic differentiation of these flooded forests. White water rivers, which carry a rich load of suspended material originating from the erosion of the Andes, have a floristic composition related to that of the noninundatable Amazonian forest. Clear water and black water rivers, which originate in the Amazon Basin or its adjacent crystalline shields, are nutrient-poor and more or less acidic; their flora is related to that of peculiar woodland and savannah vegetation on oligotrophic white sand. The distribution patterns of floodplain species of nutrient-poor waters point to a centre of diversity in the Upper Rio Negro region, and another one in the Guayana lowland. These coincide with diversity centres for species of non-flooded habitats. Hence it seems unlikely that species diversity is directly influenced by pluviosity. The flooded forests have developed biotic interactions with the fish fauna of the Amazon Basin, which are vital for their continued existence. It is assumed that the origin of these habitats, their biota and their interactions dates back long into the Tertiary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adis, J., 1984: “Seasonal igapó”-forests of Central Amazonian black-water rivers and their terrestrial arthropod fauna. — SeeSioli 1984, pp. 245–268.

  • Anderson, W. R., 1981:Malpighiaceae. — Mem. New York Bot. Gard.32: 21–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, C. C., 1972:Olmedieae, Brosimeae. — Flora Neotropica Mongr.7. — New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandbyge, J., 1986: A revision of the genusTriplaris (Polygonaceae). — Nordic J. Bot.6: 545–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcante, P. B., 1983: Revisão taxonômica do gêneroSimaba Aubl. (Simaroubaceae) na America do Sul. — Publ. Avuls. Museu Goeldi, Belem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. S., 1953: A taxonomic revision of the genusMacrolobium. — Mem. New York Bot. Gard.8/4: 257–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1968: Flora Neotropica monogr.1:Swartzia. — New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1976: A taxonomic revision ofElizabetha (Leg. Caes.). — Proc. Kon. Nederl. Akad. Wet. C79: 323–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuatrecasas, J., 1961: A taxonomic revision of theHumiriaceae. — Contr. U.S. Herb.35: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducke, A., 1913: Explorações scientíficas no Estado do Pará. — Bol. Museu Goeldi7: 100–198, 27t.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1930: Plantes nouvelles ou peu connues de la région amazonienne (4e série). — Arch. Jardim Bot. Rio de Janeiro5: 101–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1949: Arvores amazônicas e sua propagação. — Bol. Museu Paraense E. Goeldi10: 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1953: Phytogeographical notes on the Brazilian Amazon. — Anais Acad. Brasil. Ciênc.25: 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, J. D., 1958: The New World species ofCynometra. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.45: 313–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A., 1905: Über floristische Verwandtschaft zwischen dem tropischen Afrika und Amerika, sowie über die Annahme eines versunkenen brasilianisch-äthiopischen Continents. — Sitz. Ber. Kgl. Preuss. Akad. Wiss., Phys.-Math. Cl., VI 1905: 180–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exell, A. W., Stace, C. A., 1963: A revision of the generaBuchenavia andRamatuella. — Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) London Bot.3/1.

  • Fittkau, E. J., 1973: Artenmannigfaltigkeit amazonischer Lebensräume aus ökologischer Sicht. — Amazoniana (Kiel)4: 321–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, A. H., 1982: Patterns of neotropical plant species diversity. — Evol. Biol.15: 1–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gessner, F., 1968: Zur ökologischen Problematik der Überschwemmungswälder des Amazonas. — Intern. Revue Ges. Hydrobiol.53: 525–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, M., 1980: The fishes and the forest. — Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourou, P., 1950: Observações geográficas na Amazônia. — Rev. Bras. Geogr.11: 335–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabert, H., 1983: Das Amazonas-Entwässerungssystem in Raum und Zeit. — Geolog. Rundschau72: 671–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Mögliche Wanderwege und Phylogonie der südamerikanischenIniidae (Cetacea, Mammalia). — Amazoniana (Kiel)8: 365–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J., 1910: Mattas e madeiras amazonicas. — Bol. Museu Goeldi6: 91–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, O., 1982: Significance of savanna vegetation in the Amazon territory of Venezuela. — SeePrance 1982, pp. 221–244.

  • Hueck, K., 1966: Die Wälder Südamerikas. — Stuttgart: G. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, M., 1979: A general hypothesis of species diversity. — Amer. Naturalist113: 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junk, W., 1984: Ecology of the várzea, floodplain of Amazonian white-water rivers. — SeeSioli 1984, pp. 215–243.

  • Keel, S. H. K., Prance, G. T., 1979: Studies of the vegetation of a white-sand black-water igapó (Rio Negro, Brazil). — Acta Amazonica9: 645–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubitzki, K., 1978:Caraipa andMahurea (Bonnetiaceae). — Mem. New York Bot. Gard.29: 82–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, D. de A., 1966: Contribuição ao estudo do paralelismo da flora amazônico-nor-destina. — Inst. Pesqu. Agron. Pernambuco, Nov. Ser., Bol. tecn. no.19. Recife.

  • Morley, T., 1975: The South American distribution of theMemecyleae (Melastomataceae) in relation to the Guiana area and to the question of forest refuges in Amazonia. — Phytologia31: 279–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B. W., Cid Ferreira, C. A., Todzia, C. A., Zarucchi, J. L., Hill, S. R., 1987: Distributional and ecological notes onPolygonanthus amazonicus Ducke. — Acta Amazonica15/1–2 Supl.: 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires, J. M., 1973: Tipos de vegetação da Amazônia. — Publ. Avulsas Museu Goeldi20: 179–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G. T., 1972: Flora Neotropica monogr.7. Chrysobalanaceae. — New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1973: Phytogeographic support to the theory of Pleistocene forest refuges in the Amazon basin. — Acta Amazonica3: 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1979: Notes on the vegetation of Amazonia. 3. The terminology of Amazonian forest types subject to inundation. — Brittonia31: 26–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, (Ed.), 1982: Biological diversification in the tropics. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980:Anthodiscus (Caryocaraceae), um gênero disjunto entre a Amazônia e o leste do Brasil. — Rev. Brasil. Bot.3: 63–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putzer, H., 1984: The geological evolution of the Amazon basin and its mineral resources. — SeeSioli 1984, pp. 15–46.

  • Rodrigues, W., 1961: Estudo preliminar de mata de várzea alta de uma ilha do baixo Rio Negro de sólo argiloso e úmido. — Inst. Nac. Pesqu. da Amazônia, Botânica, Publ. no.10. Manaus.

  • Rogers, G. K., 1984: Flora Neotropica Monogr.39. Gleasonia, Henriquezia, andPlatycarpum (Rubiaceae). — New York: New York Bot. Gard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholander, P. F., Oliveira Perez, M., 1968: Sap tension in flooded trees and bushes of the Amazon. — Plant Physiol.43: 1870–1873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, R., 1984: The role of fungi in Amazonian forests and in reforestation. — SeeSioli 1984, pp. 603–614.

  • Sioli, H., 1954: Beiträge zur regionalen Limnologie des Amazonasgebietes 2. Der Rio Arapiuns. — Arch. Hydrobiol.49: 448–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, (Ed.), 1984: The Amazon. — Monogr. Biol.56. — Dordrecht: Dr. W. Junk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleumer, H., 1954:Proteaceae americanae. — Bot. Jahrb.76: 139–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980: Flora Neotropica Monogr.22. Flacourtiaceae. — New York: New York Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Flora Neotropica Monogr.38. Olacaceae. — New York: New York Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spruce, R., 1908: Notes of a botanist on the Amazon and Andes. 2 vols. — London: Macmillan (reprint New York: Johnson 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyermark, J. A., 1982: Relationships of some Venezuelan refuges with lowland tropical floras. — SeePrance 1982, pp. 182–220.

  • Takeuchi, M., 1962: The structure of the Amazonian vegetation 6. Igapó. — J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. 3 (Botany)3: 297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. W., 1984: A new species ofSimaba (Simaroubaceae) from Pará, Brazil, with a key to the species north of the Amazon River. — Brittonia36: 244–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R. F., 1973: Floristic relationships between tropical Africa and tropical America. — InMeggers, B. J. & al. (Eds.): Tropical forest ecosystems in Africa and South America: a comparative review, pp. 27–47. — Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worbes, M., 1983: Vegetationskundliche Untersuchungen zweier Überschwemmungswälder in Zentralamazonien — vorläufige Ergebnisse. — Amazoniana (Kiel)8: 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kubitzki, K. The ecogeographical differentiation of Amazonian inundation forests. Pl Syst Evol 162, 285–304 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00936922

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00936922

Key words

Navigation