Skip to main content
Log in

Heritability of myopic refractive errors in identical and fraternal twins

  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The existence of a visual feedback control of eye growth in humans is controversal, as the contributions of genetic and environmental factors are still unknown. To evaluate the heritability of refractive defects, we measured ocular refraction in 19 monozygote and 20 dizygote twin pairs (mean age 5 years). Monozygosity was ascertained by a common chorion, similarity of somatic traits, and identical dermatogliphes and was confirmed in myopes by blood marker diagnosis. Ocular refractive defects and axial length were evaluated by eye-loplegic autorefractometry and biometry. By comparing identical and fraternal twins heritability of refractive defects was estimated to be 0.08–0.14; this low value indicates that the observed variability in refractive errors is nongenetic in origin. Three monozygote pairs were anisomyopic; differences between eyes in identical twins were related to the increased axial length of myopic eyes. In one eye, myopia was attributed to visual deprivation induced by a congenital cataract, while in five eyes it was correlated directly to the degree of astigmatic defects. The discordant axial length observed in monozygote twins is nongenetic. In agreement with previous findings reported in the literature, it is proposed that visual impoverishment of retinal images may play an early regulatory role in postnatal eye growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams DW, McBrien NA (1992) Prevalence of myopia and myopic progression in a population of clinical microscopists. Optom Vis Sci 69:467–473

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Angi MR (1991) Pre-retinal focusing of images conditions eye growth. Boll Ocul 70:283–297

    Google Scholar 

  3. Angi MR, Pucci V, Forattini F, Formentin PA (1992) Results of photorefractometric screening for amblyogenic defects in children aged 20 months. Behav Brain Res 49:91–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Angi MR, Rupolo GP, De Bertolini C, Bisantis C (1993) Personality, psychophysical stress and myopia progression: a prospective study on 57 university students. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 231:136–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ashton GC (1985) Segregation analysis of ocular refraction and myopia. Hum Hered 35:232–239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ebenholtz SM (1983) Accommodative hysteresis: a precursor for induced myopia? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 24:513–515

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Edmund J, Goldschmidt E (1988) Myopiekonkordanz und Grubenpapillendiskordanz bei einem eineiigen Zwillingspaar. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 193:645–646

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Francois J (1958) L'hérédité em Ophthalmologic. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fulton AB, Hansen RM, Petersen RA (1982) The relation of myopia and astigmatism in developing eyes. Ophthalmology 89:298–302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gee SS, Tabbara KF (1988) Increase in ocular axial length in patients with corneal opacification. Ophthalmology 95:1276–1278

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gloor P, Keech RV, Krachmer JH (1992) Factors associated with high postoperative myopia after penetrating keratoplasties in infants. Ophthalmology 99:775–779

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gordon RA, Donzis PB (1985) Refractive development of the human eye. Arch Ophthalmol 103:785–789

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hofmann WP, Carey ET (1942) Congenital myopic astigmatism in identical twins. Am J Ophthalmol 25:1495–1496

    Google Scholar 

  14. Irving EL, Callender MG, Sivak JG, Husanini A (1992) Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33 [Suppl]:708

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karlsson JL (1974) Concordance rates for myopia in twins. Clin Genet 6:142–146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lepard CW (1975) Comparative changes in the error of refraction between fixing and amblyopic eyes during growth and development. Am J Ophthalmol 80:485–490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mash AJ, Hegmann JP, Spivey BE (1975) Genetic analysis of indices of corneal power and corneal astigmatism in human populations with varying incidences of strabismus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 14:826–832

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miller-Meeks M, Bennett SR, Keech RV, Blodi CF (1990) Myopia induced by vitreous hemorrhage. Am J Ophthalmol 109:199–203

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nastri G, Caccia Perugini G, Savastano S, Polzella A, Sbordone G (1984) The evolution of refraction in the fixing and the amblyopic eye. Doc Ophthalmol 56:265–274

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nichols PC, Bilbro WC (1966) The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genet Statist Med 16:265–275

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Orth H (1954) Extreme Diskordanz der Refraktionswerte eineiiger Zwillinge. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 124:304–306

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pärssinen O, Hemminki E, Klemetti A (1989) Effect of spectacle use and accomodation on myopia progression: final result of a three-year randomised clinical trial among school children. Br J Ophthahmol 73:547–551

    Google Scholar 

  23. Post RB, Chalupa LM, Lee TJ (1982) Monocular deprivation in humans: a study of identical twins. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 23:135–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rabin J, Van Sluyters RC, Malach R (1981) Emmetropization: a vision-dependent phenomenon. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 20:561–564

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rasooly R, BenEzra D (1988) Congenital and traumatic cataract. The effect on ocular axial length. Arch Ophthalmol 106:1066–1068

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sarna S, Kaprio J, Sistonen P, Koskenvuo M (1978) Diagnosis of twin zygosity by mailed questionnaire. Hum Hered 28:241–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sofaer JA (1990) Twins. In: Emery AH and Rimon DL (eds) Principles and practice of medial genetics. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1990, pp 175–182

    Google Scholar 

  28. Steiger (1908) Über Beziehungen zwischen Myopic und Astigmatismus. Z Augenheilkd 20:97

    Google Scholar 

  29. Teikari JM, O'Donnell JJ (1989) Astigmatism in 72 twin pairs. Cornea 8:263–266

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wallman J, Gottlieb MD, Rajaram V, Fugate-Wentzek LA (1987) Local retinal regions control local eye growth and myopia. Science 237:73–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Weber E (1945) Die Vererbung der Refraktion anhand von älteren und neueren Zwillingsuntersuchungen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 20:574–577

    Google Scholar 

  32. Weekers R, Moureau P, Hacourt J, André A (1957) Contribution à le genèse des amétropies par 1'etude des jumeaux uni et bivitellins. Arch Ophtalmol 17:38–43

    Google Scholar 

  33. Weekers R, Watillon M, Thomas-Decortis G (1961) La myopie des prématurés, facteur de dissemblance dans la réfraction des jumeaux monozygotes. Arch Ophtalmol 21:217–226

    Google Scholar 

  34. Weiss AH, Ross EA (1992) Axial myopia in eyes with optic nerve hypoplasia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophhalmol 230:372–377

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wiesel TN and Raviola E (1977) Myopia and eye enlargement after neonatal lid fusion in monkeys. Nature 266:66–68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Deceased

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Angi, M.R., Clementi, M., Sardei, C. et al. Heritability of myopic refractive errors in identical and fraternal twins. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 231, 580–585 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00936522

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00936522

Keywords

Navigation