Skip to main content
Log in

Biochemical and morphological evidence for host race evolution in desert mistletoe,Phoradendron californicum (Viscaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Allozymes and morphological characters were used to test whether host race evolution—the genetic divergence of parasitic populations caused by adaptation to different host species—has occurred in desert mistletoe,Phoradendron californicum. Populations ofPhoradendron californicum from two hosts,Acacia greggii andProsopis glandulosa, were surveyed from the Mojave and Colorado deserts. Electrophoretic data indicated genetic differentiation of mistletoes occurring on these hosts. Three of four morphological characters (internode length, main shoot lateral shoot diameter ratio and berry color) also showed significant host-specific differentiation. These data support the hypothesis that host race formation has occurred or is occurring in this parasitic angiosperm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bush, G. L., 1974: The mechanism of sympatric host race formation in true fruit flies (Tephritidae). — InWhite, M. J. D., (Ed.): Genetic mechanisms of speciation in insects, pp. 3–23. — Sydney: Australian & New Zealand Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1975: Modes of animal speciation. — Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.6: 339–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, K., Dement, D., Rejmanek, M., 1985: Experimental evidence for host races in mistletoe (Phoradendron tomentosum). — Amer. J. Bot.72: 1225–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowels, R. B., 1972: Mesquite and mistletoe. — Pacific Discovery23: 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehleringer, J. R., Schulze, E.-D., Ziegler, H., Lange, O. L., Farquhar, G. D., Cowar, I. R., 1985: Xylem-tapping mistletoes: water or nutrient parasites? — Science227: 1479–1481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L. D., 1981: Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. — Prog. Phytochem.7: 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., 1981: Plant speciation. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmerly, T. E., Forsythe, A. A., Womack, M. L., 1979: Blackgum—exclusive host of mistletoe in Lawerence Co., Tennessee. — J. Tenn. Acad. Sci.54: 89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, R. L., 1958: Mistletoes in Tennessee. — Castanea23: 91–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermy, T., 1984: Evolution of insect/host plant relationships. — Amer. Naturalist124: 609–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuijt, J., 1969: The biology of parasitic flowering plants. — Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A., 1978: The origin of isolating mechanisms in flowering plants. — Evol. Biol.11: 185–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, D. S., 1971: The role of populational differentiation in experimental infection ofProsopis byPhoradendron. — Amer. J. Bot.58: 921–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munz, P. A., Keck, D. D., 1959: A California flora. — Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., 1973: The theory and estimation of genetic distance. — InMorton, N. E., (Ed.): Genetic structure of populations, pp. 45–54. — Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen, E. T., Sharifi, M. R., Rundel, P. W., 1984: Comparative water relations of phreatophytes in the Sonoran desert of California. — Ecology65: 767–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrewicz, T. A., Kamil, A. C., 1981: Search images and the detection of cryptic prey: an operant approach. — InKamil, A. C., Sargent, T. D., (Eds.): Foraging behavior, ecological ethological and phycological approaches. — New York: Garland STPM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, C. F., Reed, P. G., 1951: Host distribution of mistletoe in Kentucky. — Castanea16: 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneck, J., 1884: Notes onPhoradendron flavescens, NVH. II. — Bot. Gaz.9: 101–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, O., 1958: Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Mistel (Viscum album L.). — Pharmazie13: 781–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spooner, D. M., 1983: The northern range of eastern mistletoes,Phoradendron serotinum (Viscaceae), and its status in Ohio. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club110: 489–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statler, R., 1971: Arborescent preference ofPhoradendron flavescens. — Castanea41: 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, V. E., Mahall, B. E., 1983: Host specificity by a mistletoe,Phoradendron villosum (Nutt.)Nutt. subsp.villosum, on three oak species in California. — Bot. Gaz.144: 124–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubeuf, von, 1923: Monographie der Mistel. — Munich, Berlin: R. Oldenbourg, 832 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsberg, G. E., 1975: Digestive adaptations ofPhainopepla nitens associated with the eating of mistletoe berries. — Condor77: 167–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendel, J. F., Stuber, L. W., 1984: Plant isozymes: Enzymes studied and buffer systems for their electrophoretic resolution in starch gels. — Isozyme Bull.17: 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glazner, J.T., Devlin, B. & Ellstrand, N.C. Biochemical and morphological evidence for host race evolution in desert mistletoe,Phoradendron californicum (Viscaceae). Pl Syst Evol 161, 13–21 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00936008

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00936008

Key words

Navigation