Skip to main content
Log in

Cryopreservation of Azotobacteraceae in liquid nitrogen

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
MIRCEN journal of applied microbiology and biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Summary

Agar-grown cultures of 144 strains of Azotobacteraceae were suspended in 0.5 ml of 10% (v/v) glycerol in glass ampoules and rapidly frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen. On revival, ampoules were rapidly warmed by agitation in a waterbath at 33°C until thawing occurred. All cultures remained viable for up to 7.5 years, grew with short lag phases on revival and suffered no apparent phenotypic changes. Quantitative assessments of representative strains of all species suffered losses in viability after 2.5 or 5 years in liquid nitrogen that were generally less than one decimal reduction from unfrozen suspensions of 107–109 cells/ml. The method is considerably better than freeze-drying or simple desiccation for the more-difficult species likeAzomonas insignis, A. agilis, Azotobacter beijerinckii, Azomonotrichon macrocytogenes andDerxia gummosa, and indications are that strains of all species could be preserved in this way for decades.

Résumé

Les cultures sur agar de 144 souches d'Azotobacteraceae ont été suspendues, chacune, dans 0.5 ml de glycerol à 10% (vol. vol.−1) dans des ampoules en verre, congelées rapidement et conservées dans l'azote liquide. Pour les revivifier, les ampoules ont été très rapidement réchauffées par agitation dans un bain d'eau à 33°C jusqu'au dégel. Toutes les cultures sont restées viables pour des périodes allant jusqu'à 7.5 ans, se sont développées avec des phases de latence courtes lors de la revivification et ne présentaient aucun changement phénotypique. Les souches représentatives de chaque espèce n'ont souffert en général que de pertes de viabilité inférieures à une réduction décimale, par rapport à la culture de départ qui contenait entre 107 et 109 cellules par ml. Cette méthode de conservation est considérablement meilleure que la lyophilisation ou la simple dessication pour les espèces plus délicates commeAzomonas insignis, A. agilis, Azotobacter beijerinckii, Azomonotrichon macrocytogenes etAzomonas gummosa. Des indices suggèrent que les souches de toutes les espèces pourraient bien être consevables pendant des décades.

Resumen

Se suspendieron 144 cepas de azotobacteriaceas, cultivadas en agar, en 0.5 ml de glicerol al 10% (v/v) en viales de cristal que se congelaron rapidamente y se almacenaron en nitrógeno líquido. Para recuperar las cepas se calentaron los viales mediante agitación en un baño de agua a 33°C hasta que se deshelaron los cultivos. Todas las cepas permanecieron viables hasta 7.5 años, al recuperarlas crecieron con fases lag cortas y no sufrieron cambios fenotipicos apreciables. Las cepas representativas de todas las especies sufrieron perdidas de viabilidad inferiores a un decimal comparadas con suspensiones no congeladas de 107–109 células/ml; después de permanecer en nitrógeno líquido 2.5 ó 5 años. Este método es sensiblemente mejor que la liofilizatión o la simple desecación para las especies más dificiles como:Azomonas insignis, A. agilis, Azotobacter beijerinckii, Azomonotrichon macrocytogenes, y,Derxia gummosa. Existen indicios que permiten suponer que cepas de todas estas especies podrían conservarse mediante este método durante décadas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adb-El-Malek, Y. &Ishac, Y. Z. 1966 Longevity ofAzotobacter.Plant and Soil 24, 325–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antheunisse, J. 1972 Preservation of microorganisms.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 38, 617–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antheunisse, J. 1973 Viability of lyophilized microorganisms after storage.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 39, 243–248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bascomb, S. &Jackson, R. M. 1965Rhizobium culture collection.Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1964, Part 1, 86–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becking, J. H. 1961 Studies on nitrogen-fixing bacteria of the genusBeijerinckia. I. Geographical and ecological distribution in soils.Plant and Soil 14, 49–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becking, J. H. 1981 The family Azotobacteraceae. InThe Prokaryotes: A Handbook on Habitats, Isolation and Identification of Bacteria, Volume 1, pp. 795–817, ed. Starr, M. P., Stolp, H., Truper, H. G., Balow, A. & Schegel, H. G. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousfield, I. J. &Mackenzie, A. R. 1977 Inactivation of bacteria by freeze-drying. InInhibition and Inactivation of Vegetative Microbes, ed. Skinner, F. A. & Hugo, W. B. Society for Applied Bacteriology Symposium Series No. 5. pp. 329–344. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Burlingham, S. K. &Jackson, R. M. 1962 Studies onAzotobacter species in soil. I. Comparison of media and techniques for countingAzotobacter in soil.Plant and Soil 17, 309–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, W. A. &Higgens, C. E. 1973 Preservation and storage of microorganisms in the gas phase of liquid nitrogen.Cryobiology 10, 364–367.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goos, R. D., Davis, E. E. &Butterfield, W. 1967 Effect of warming rates on the viability of frozen fungous spores.Mycologia 59, 58–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, V. 1955 TheAzotobacter-flora of some Danish watercourses.Saertryk of Botanisk Tidsskrift 52, 143–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, V. &Petersen, E. J. 1954 Studies on the occurrence ofAzotobacter in Danish forest soil.Royal Veterinary and Agricultural Yearbook, 1954, 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, A. G. &Nilsson, P. E. 1961 On the survival ofAzotobacter species after freezedrying.Kungliga Lantbrukshogskolans Annaler 27, 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, D. B. 1968Azotobacter, some physiological aspects reviewed. InFestskrift til Hans Lauritz Jensen, pp. 61–68. Lyngby: Statens Planteavls-Laboratorium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupletskaya, M. B. 1961 Lyophilization of saprophytic microorganisms.Microbiology (English edition),30, 596–599. Translated fromMikrobiologiya 30, 717–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapage, S. P., Shelton, J. E., Mitchell, T. G. &Mackenzie, A. R. 1970 Culture collections and the preservation of bacteria. InMethods in Microbiology, Volume 3A, ed. Norris, J. R. & Ribbons, D. W. pp. 135–228. London and New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maliszewska, W. &Niezychowska, Z. 1973 Effect of lyophilization on morphological and physiological properties of some strains ofAzotobacter andBeijerinckia.Acta microbiologica polonica, Series B 5, 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, I. E. &Bailey, E. G. 1968 Liquid nitrogen preservation of standard inoculum: gasphase storage.Applied Microbiology 16, 912–916.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. &Fisher, P. J. 1950 Viability of dried bacterial cultures.Journal of General Microbiology 4, 450–456.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ridge, E. H. 1970 Inoculation and survival ofAzotobacter chroococcum on stored wheat seed.Journal of Applied Bacteriology 33, 262–269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skerman, V. B. D. 1973 The organization of a small general culture collection. InProceedings of the Second International Conference on Culture Collections, São Paulo, ed. Pestana de Castro, A. F., Da Silva, E. J., Skerman, V. B. D. & Leveritt, W. W. pp. 1–21. Brisbane: UNESCO/UNEP/ICRO/WFCC/World Data Center for Microorganisms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sly, L. I. 1983 Preservation of microbial cultures. InPlant Bacterial Diseases: A Diagnostic Guide, Chapter 13, pp. 275–298, ed. Fahy, P. & Persley, G. J. Sydney: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. D. &Wyss, O. 1969 The rapid loss of viability ofAzotobacter in aqueous solutions.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 35, 84–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Society of American Bacteriologists 1957Manual of Microbiological Methods, p. 101. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. P. 1977Catalogue of the Queensland Wheat Research Institute Collection of Azotobacteraceae Cultures, No. 447. Brisbane: World Data Centre for Microorganisms Computer Data Base.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. P. &Skerman, V. B. D. 1979Azotobacteraceae: The Taxonomy and Ecology of the Aerobic Nitrogen-fixing Bacteria. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. P. 1987 Survival of Azotobacteraceae desiccated over silica gel.MIRCEN Journal of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 3, 185–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vela, G. R. 1974 Survival ofAzotobacter in dry soil.Applied Microbiology 28, 77–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winogradsky, S. 1938 Sur la morphologie et l'oecologie desAzotobacter.Annales de l'Institut Pasteur, Paris 60, 351–400.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, J.P. Cryopreservation of Azotobacteraceae in liquid nitrogen. Mircen Journal 3, 323–336 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00933586

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00933586

Keywords

Navigation