Skip to main content
Log in

Antigenic differences between JapaneseTheileria sergenti and other benignTheileria species of cattle from Australia (T. buffeli) and Britain (T. orientalis)

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Serological comparisons among piroplasm antigens of the benignTheileria species of cattle from Japan, Australia and Britain, which are frequently referred to asT. sergenti, T. buffeli andT. orientalis, were carried out. The results obtained from comparative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using sera from infected cattle suggest thatT. sergenti could be differentiated from bothT. buffeli andT. orientalis by their serological dissimilarities. Western blotting combined with two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) revealed that both the 33-kDa piroplasm protein ofT. sergenti and the similar 34-kDa protein ofT. buffeli andT. orientalis corresponded to immunodominant antigens against cattle. The other 32-kDa proteins ofT. buffeli andT. orientalis also represented immunodominant antigens. Cross-reactivities of the 32-and 34-kDa proteins were observed betweenT. buffeli andT. orientalis, whereas the 33-kDa protein ofT. sergenti could be differentiated from the similar 34-kDa proteins ofT. buffeli/orientalis. The present study suggests thatT. sergenti should be separated fromT. buffeli andT. orientalis on the basis of their serological dissimilarities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asao T, Kinoshita Y, Kozaki S, Uemura T, Sakaguchi G (1984) Purification and some properties ofAeromonas hydrophila hemolysin. Infect Immun 46:122–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Callow LL (1984) Theileriosis. In: Callow LL (ed) Animal health in Australia, vol 5. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, pp 168–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn SD (1986) Effects of the modification of transfer buffer composition and denaturation of proteins in gels on the recognition of proteins of Western blots by monoclonal antibodies. Anal Biochem 157:144–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaki K, Ito Y, Kamio T, Kitaoka S (1985) The presence ofTheileria sergenti inHaemaphysalis longicornis overwintering in pasture in Japan. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 79:519–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaki K, Kamio T, Kawazu S (1991a)Theileria sergenti cannot be regarded as the same species asT. buffeli andT. orientalis because of its transmissibility only byKaiseriana ticks. In: Dusbabek F (ed) Modern acarology, vol 1. Publishing House Academic, Prague (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaki K, Kawazu S, Kamio T, Stewart NP (1991b) Experimental transmission of JapaneseTheileria sergenti and AustralianT. buffeli by haemaphysaline tick species. In: Dusbabek F (ed) Modern acarology, vol 2. Publishing House Academia, Prague (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glascodine J, Tetley L, Tait A, Brown D, Shields B (1990) Developmental expression ofTheileria annulata merozoite surface antigen. Mol Biochem Parasitol 40:105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley WL, Finkelstein E, Holst BD (1985) Identification of surface proteins on bovine leukocytes by biotin-avidin protein blotting technique. J Immunol Methods 85:195–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Katende JM, Goddeeris BM, Morzaria SP, Nkonge CG, Musoke AJ (1990) Identification of aTheileria mutans-specific antigen for use in an antibody and antigen detection ELISA. Parasite Immunol 12:419–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Morzaria SP, Barnett SF, Brocklesby DW (1974) Isolation ofTheileria mutans from cattle in Essex. Vet Rec 94:256

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Farrell PZ, Goodman HM, O'Farrell PH (1977) High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of basic as well as acidic proteins. Cell 12:1133–1142

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu S, Suzuki K, Nakamura K, Kadota K, Fujisaki K, Ito S, Minami T (1988) Isolation ofTheileria sergenti piroplasms from infected erythrocytes and development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serodiagnosis ofT. sergenti infections. Res Vet Sci 45:206–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart NP, DeVos AJ, Shiels JA, McGregor W (1987a) The experimental transmisson ofTheileria buffeli of cattle in Australia byHaemaphysalis humerosa. Aust Vet J 64:81–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart NP, DeVos AJ, McGregor W, Shiels IA (1987b)Haemaphysalis humerosa, notH. longicornis, is the likely vector ofTheileria buffeli in Australia. Aust Vet J 64:280–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto C, Sato M, Kawazu S, Kamio T, Fujisaki K (1991a) Purification of merozoites ofTheileria sergenti from infected bovine erythrocytes. Parasitol Res 77:129–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto C, Kawazu S, Kamio T, Fujisaki K (1991b) Protein analysis ofTheileria sergenti/buffeli/orientalis piroplasms by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Parasitol 102:341–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Uilenberg G, Perie NM, Spanjer AAM, Franssen FFJ (1985)Theileria orientalis, a cosmopolitan blood parasite of cattle: demonstration of the schizont stage. Res Vet Sci 38:352–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakimoff WL, Dekhtereff NA (1930) Zur Frage über die Theileriose in Ostsibirien. Arch Protistenkd 72:176–189

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawazu, S., Sugimoto, C., Kamio, T. et al. Antigenic differences between JapaneseTheileria sergenti and other benignTheileria species of cattle from Australia (T. buffeli) and Britain (T. orientalis). Parasitol Res 78, 130–135 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931654

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931654

Keywords

Navigation