Skip to main content
Log in

Privatization of public enterprises

A principal-agent approach comparing efficiency in private and public sectors

  • Published:
Empirica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Wird ein Unternehmen vom öffentlichen ins private Eigentum übergeführt, so gilt folgendes: Im öffentlichen Unternehmen sind das Ausmaß der Forschungs- und Entwicklungsinvestitionen sowie der Arbeitseinsatz des Managers niedriger als im Kostenminimum. Im privatisierten Unternehmen werden dagegen der Arbeitseinsatz des Managers und die Forschungs- und Entwicklungsinvestitionen in kostenminimierendem Umfang gewählt. In der öffentlichen Unternehmung führt Informationsasymmetrie zu einer stärkeren Spreizung der Managerentlohnung als im privatisierten Unternehmen. In privatisierten Unternehmen ist die Managerentlohnung so niedrig, daß der Manager nur seinen Reservationsnutzen erhält.

Abstract

In this paper the following results of a transition from public to private ownership are obtained: The manager of a public firm engages in less effort than is efficient; in a privatized firm the manager's effort is chosen efficiently. The reward to the manager of a public firm is more differentiated than efficient. In the case of an unfavourable economic environment the reward is higher than efficient. On the other hand, the manager in a privatized firm is always rewarded efficiently. It is irrelevant whether the public manager is incompletely informed about the particular mix of government's multiple objectives as long as the government chooses the incentive-compatible reward for the manager.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bennett, J. T., Johnson, M. H., “Tax Reduction Without Sacrifice: Private Sector Production of Public Services”, Public Finance Quarterly, 1980, 8, pp. 363–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, A. E., Vining, A. R., “Ownership and Performance in Competitive Environments: A Comparison of the Performance of Private, Mixed and State-Owned Enterprises”, Journal of Law and Economics, 1989, 32, pp. 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bös, D., Peters, W., “A Principal-Agent Approach on Manager Effort and Control in Privatized and Public Firms”, in Ott, A., Hartley, K. (Eds.), Privatization and Economic Efficiency, E. Elgar, Aldershot, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding, T. E., Pommerehne, W. W., Schneider, F., “Comparing the Efficiency of Private and Public Production: The Evidence from Five Countries”, in Bös, D., Musgrave, R. A., Wiseman, J. (Eds.), “Public Production”, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie/Journal of Economics, Supplementum 2, 1982.

  • Freixas, X., Laffont, J.-J., “Average Cost Pricing versus Marginal Cost Pricing under Moral Hazard”, Journal of Public Economics, 1985, 26, pp. 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.-J., Tirole, J., “Using Cost Observation to Regulate Firms”, Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94, pp. 614–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millward, R., Parker, D. M., “Public and Private Enterprise: Comparative Behaviour and Relative Efficiency”, in Millward, R., Parker, D. M., Rosenthal, L., Sumner, M. T., Topham, T. (Eds.), Public Sector Economics, Longman, London, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D. M., “Is the Private Sector More Efficient? A Study in the Public V Private Debate”, Public Administration Bulletin, 1985, (August), pp. 2–23.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bös, D., Peters, W. Privatization of public enterprises. Empirica 18, 5–16 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00924998

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00924998

Keywords

Navigation