Skip to main content
Log in

The Additive Factor Method: A differential diagnostic tool in hyperactivity and learning disability

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Additive Factor Method assumes that task performance is the sum of sequential and independent processes. We studied the duration of the central processes (memory search and decision) and the motor decision process in hyperactive and learning-disabled children under socalled divided attention and S-R compatibility conditions. It was found that the learning-disabled were impaired in memory search and decision processes whereas hyperactives were impaired in the motor decision process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, P. T., Elardo, P. T.,& Dykman, R. A. (1979). A psychosocial study of hyperactive and learning-disabled boys.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7, 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, B. R., Oswald, H. M., & Seunath, O. H. M. (1973). The effect of stimulus change on attending behavior in normal children and children with learning disorders.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 6, 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, R. (1981).Hyperactive children: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, R. (1982). Guidelines for defining hyperactivity in children. In B. B. Lahey & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.),Advances in clinical child psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 137–180). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, R. (1984).Do as we say, not as we do: The problem of stimulus control and rule governed behavior in attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity. Paper presented at Attention Deficit Disorder IV, Toronto, Canada.

  • Blouin, A. G., Bornstein, R. A., & Trites, R. L. (1978). Teenage alcohol abuse among hyperactive children: A five year follow-up study.Journal of Paediatric Psychology, 3, 188–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookhuis, K. A., Mulder, G., Mulder, L. J. M., Gloerich, A. B. M., Van der Meere, J. J., & Ellermann, H. (1981). Late positive components and stimulus evaluation time.Biological Psychology, 13, 392–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway, E. (1983). The pharmacology of human information processing.Psychophysiology, 20, 359–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. B. (1975). Mother-child interaction: A comparison of hyperactive, learning disabled and normal boys.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 45, 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coons, H. W., Klorman, R., & Borgstedt, A. D. (1987). Effects of methylphenidate on adolescents with a childhood history of attention deficit disorder: II. Information processing.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 368–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coons, H. W., Peloquin, L. J., Klorman, R, Bauer, L. O., Ryan, R. M., Permutter, R. A., & Salzman, L. F. (1981). Effects of methylphenidate on young adults' vigilance and eventrelated potentials.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 51, 373–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise!.... Surprise?Psychophysiology, 18, 493–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, V. I. (1983). Attentional and cognitive problems. In M. Rutter (Ed.).Developmental neuropsychiatry (pp. 280–329). New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, V. I., & Peters, K. G. (1979). Toward a clearer definition of the attentional deficit of hyperactive children. In G. A. Hale & M. Lewis (Eds.),Attention and the development of cognitive skills (pp. 173–247). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykman, R. A., Ackerman, M. A., & Oglesby, D. M. (1979). Selective and sustained attention in hyperactive learning disabled and normal boys.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 167, 288–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, A. D., & Schneider, W. (1981). Controlled and automatic processing during tasks requiring sustained attention: A new approach to vigilance.Human Factors, 23, 737–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frowein, H. W. (1981).Selective drug effects on information processing. Doctoral Thesis. Enschede, Sneldruk Boulevard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. J., & Levin, H. (1975).The psychology of reading. Boston: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, J. W. (1967). The effect of distraction on selective attention.Child Development, 38, 685–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, D. P., Gajar, A. H., Cohen, S. B., & Tarver, S. G. (1978). Selective attention and locus of control in learning diasabled and normal children.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, D. P., Kaufman, J. M., & Ball, D. W. (1976). Selective attention and cognitive tempo of low achieving and high achieving sixth-grade males.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 38, 597–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hink, R. F., Fenton, W. H., Tinklenberg, J. R., Pfefferbaum, A., & Kopell, B. S. (1978). Vigilance and human attention under conditions of methylphenidate and secobarbital intoxication.Psychophysiology, 15, 116–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kema, G. N. (1978).Handleiding bij de Nederlandse Bewerking van de PMA 2–4 en 5–6. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klorman, R., Brumaghim, J. T., Fitzpatrick, P., & Borgstedt, A. D. (1987). Effects of methylphenidate on specific aspects of information processing: Evidence from the additive factors method and event-related potentials.Psychophysiology, 24, 572–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loney, J. (1980). Hyperkinesis comes of age: What do we know and where should we go?American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 50, 28–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, R. L. McIntyre, L. W., & Murray, M. E. (1982). Visual selective attention in learning disabled and normal boys.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magliero, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1984). On the dependency of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes.Psychophysiology, 21, 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, G. (1983). The information processing paradigm: Concepts, methods and limitations.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24, 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, G., Gloerich, A. B. M., Brookhuis, K. A., Van Dellen, H. J., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1984). Stage analysis of the reaction process using brain evoked potentials and reaction time.Psychological Research, 46, 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In B. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information processing: Tutorial in performance and recognition (pp. 41–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. O. (1976).Psychological aspects of learning disabilities and reading disorders. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. O., & Pelham, W. E. (1981). Child psychopathology.Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 243–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A. F. (1983). Towards a model of stress and human performance.Acta Psychologica, 53, 61–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention.Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergeant, J. A., & Scholten, C. A. (1983). A stages-of-information approach to hyperactivity.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergeant, J. A., & Scholten, C. A. (1985a). On resource strategy limitations in hyperactivity: Cognitive impulsivity reconsidered.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergeant, J. A., & Scholten, C. A. (1985b). On data limitations in hyperactivity.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergeant, J. A., & Van der Meere, J. J. (1988a). The diagnostic significance of attentional processing: Its significance for ADD(H) classification, a future DSM. In T. Sagvolden, H. M. Borggrevink, & T. Archer (Eds.),Attention deficit disorder and hyperkinetic syndrome (pp. 149–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergeant, J. A., & Van der Meere, J. J. (1988b). What happens after a hyperactive commits an error?Psychiatry Resarch.24, 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergeant, J. A., Van Velthoven, R., & Virginia, A. (1979). Hyperactivity, impulsivity and reflectivity. An examination of their relationship and implications for clinical child psychology.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 20, 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Dectection, search and attention.Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S. (1969). Discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.),Attention and performance (Vol. 2, pp. 276–315). Amsterdam: NorthHolland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S. (1975). Memory scanning: New findings and current controversies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. A., Boydstun, J. A., Dykman, R. A. Peters, J. E., & Sinton, D. W. (1967). Presumed minimal brain dysfunction in children: Relationship to performance and selected behavioral tests.Archives of General Psychiatry, 16, 281–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. A., Stover, C. E., & Backus, J. T. (1970). The hyperkinetic child: Effect of incentives on the speed of rapid tapping.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 56–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarver, S. G., Hallahan, D. P., Kaufman, J. M., & Ball, D. W. (1976). Verbal rehearsal and selective attention in children with learning disabilities: A developmental lag.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 375–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities.Psychometric Monographs, 1.

  • Trebasso, T., & Bower, G. H. (1968).Attention in learning: Theory and research. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meere, J. J., & Sergeant, J. A., (1987). A divided attention experiment with pervasively hyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15, 379–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meere, J. J., & Sergeant, J. A. (1988a). Acquisition of attention skill in pervasively hyperactive children.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 29, 301–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meere, J. J., & Sergeant, J. A. (1988b). Focused attention in pervasively hyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16, 627–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meere, J. J., & Sergeant, J. A. (1988c). Controlled processing and vigilance in hyperactivity: Time will tell.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16, 641–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrana, F., & Pihl, R. O. (1980). Selective attention deficit in learning disabled children: A cognitive interpretation.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 387–391.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors wish to thank L. Leertouwer for making the drawings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Meere, J., van Baal, M. & Sergeant, J. The Additive Factor Method: A differential diagnostic tool in hyperactivity and learning disability. J Abnorm Child Psychol 17, 409–422 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00915035

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00915035

Keywords

Navigation